Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Appeal for EED

Rate this question


bleggett29

Question

Is an appeal for EED feasible with the following facts:

1.) Veteran started a claim via eBenefits, thus establishing veterans' intent to file.

2.) 9 months after starting claim, veteran attempts to complete and submit claim via eBenefits but an error caused by eBenefits forced veteran to delete and start new claim (twice).

3.) VA grants claim with an effective date the new claim was completed and submitted (9 months after ITF)

4.) Veteran did receive  via email Receipt of Claim  of when veteran started original claim.

 

I've been looking at 38 CFR § 3.1 (r) but am unsure if it would apply in this case. 

 

Thanks

 

US Army 1992-1998
MOS 12B
B Co 31st En Bn Ft. Leonardwood, MO Oct. 1992 - Jan. 1993 OSUT (Basic/AIT)
C Co 16th En Bn Erlangen, Germany Jan. - Dec. 1993 / Bamberg, Germany Dec. 1993 - Feb. 1995 / Lucky Base, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Aug. - Dec, 1993
19th Repl. Co Ft. Bragg, NC Feb. 1995 - Apr. 1996 R&U
B Co 82nd En Bn Bamberg, Germany Apr. 1996 - May 1998 / Camp McGovern, Brcko, Bosnia Mar. - Nov. 1997 / DMOS 62J Jan. 1997 - May 1998

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I did a HLR for an EED. I had started a new claim the same day I submitted a claim in ebenefits, it considered my new claim as a duplicate to the one I filed. Is what I did to establish it as being an error from ebenefits is I printed out copies of om messages from ebenefits one showing the claim I filed and one showing that I initiated a claim. 

Here is part of the verbiage I used in my HLR: "The system thought this was a duplicate filing since I had filed a claim earlier for major depression and then later in the day started a claim online for erectile dysfunction. This appears to be a system error/glitch and for some reason the actual effective was lost. I am submitting screen prints which shows when I submitted the claim for major depression, when I started a claim online for erectile dysfunction and where the system shows a duplicate filing on February 17, 2019 when in reality it was not a duplicate."

Hopefully ebenefits message section shows that you started a claim, if so it is an easy fix for the VA.

It was corrected in less that 45 days and I got my back pay.

Good luck

I am not an attorney or an a credited VA rep. These are my personal opinions and experiences, always remember what worked for me may not work for you.

You as the veteran are your own best advocate and no one knows your disabilities better than you. It is highly recommended that you as the veteran research and verify that any opinion given meets your specific situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks for your reply. This brings my spirits up some. I've been fighting this for awhile.

I just looked at my messages on eBenefits. It does show the original claim, both of the other failed claims, and the successfully submitted claim. The original filing date was Jan 2013. Final claim submitted Sep 2013. Claim awarded July 2015. NOD filed Aug 2015. Entered RAMP July 2018. Received denial Jan 2019. Been sitting on this since. Decided to get off my @ss recently.  If awarded, it would be a sizable chunk of change.  7 months @ 100%  plus (hopefully) 5 years 8 months of SMC(S-2) that was also denied in Jan 2019. I was awarded SMC(S-1) last Oct. after finally getting 100 + 60.

US Army 1992-1998
MOS 12B
B Co 31st En Bn Ft. Leonardwood, MO Oct. 1992 - Jan. 1993 OSUT (Basic/AIT)
C Co 16th En Bn Erlangen, Germany Jan. - Dec. 1993 / Bamberg, Germany Dec. 1993 - Feb. 1995 / Lucky Base, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Aug. - Dec, 1993
19th Repl. Co Ft. Bragg, NC Feb. 1995 - Apr. 1996 R&U
B Co 82nd En Bn Bamberg, Germany Apr. 1996 - May 1998 / Camp McGovern, Brcko, Bosnia Mar. - Nov. 1997 / DMOS 62J Jan. 1997 - May 1998

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

File an appeal beginning with filing a nod to the VARO decision.  

Submit "any" documentation that you have that you filed an ITF.  However, understand that the ITF has "gone away", but older ITF's may work.  

In the future dont file an ITF, file for benefits.  Its one MORE way the VA tries to find a glitch to hornswaggle your effective date.  

Effective dates are complex..one of the most complex of VA law.  The general rule is your effective date is the later of the date you filed or the facts found.  (Date the doc said you were disabled).  There are several exceptions to the general rule, however.  And there are exceptions to the exceptions.  

An attorney may be able to help you with more than 5 years of benefits.  Usually, they dont want to mess with it if its less than 10,000 retro.  Normally they like working six figure retros, but ask them for help and see what they say.  It costs zero to ask.  

 

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Since you received a decision Jan. 2019, you have the option of Ramp (AMA) or legacy appeals.  A few of your options are:

1.  DRO

2.  HLR

3.  SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM LANE

4.  BVA appeal with hearing.

5.  Bva without hearing.  

6.  Numbers 1,3,4,or 5 with new evidence.  

7.  HLR with no new evidence.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use