Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Degenerative arthritis- Back

Rate this question


Frankgs

Question

I recently had back xrays done at the va and the notes below are written by my Rheumatologist. i currently have 10% Left and 10% Right knee Osteoarthritis. Are the findings below related at all to the osteoarthritis in my knees? Any translation is greatly appreciated

 

Findings: 7 views of the lumbar spine are submitted. There are

five non-ribbearing vertebral bodies. There is preservation of

normal lumbosacral lordosis. The disc spaces and vertebral body

heights are within normal limits. There is marginal osteophyte

formation involving the lower thoracic spine. The oblique views

show unilateral left L4 spondylolysis with no spondylolisthesis.

No significant bony neural foraminal encroachment. There is mild

facet arthropathy of the lower lumbar spine The sacrum and

sacroiliac joints appear intact. No paravertebral mass is

appreciated radiographically.

Findings: There is preservation of thoracic kyphosis with 12 rib

bearing thoracic segments identified. The visualized

cervicothoracic and thoracolumbar junctions appear grossly

normal. The visualized vertebral bodies and disc spaces appear

to be maintained in height. There are significant degenerative

changes of the lower thoracic spine with marginal osteophyte

formation. The pedicles appear symmetric. No acute fracture,

malalignment or focal paravertebral soft tissue abnormality is

identified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Just my opinion   it would be best if you ask a specialist this question?

 were not Dr's But in some cases a condition that a Veteran has will cause other conditions to arise  but that information needs to come from a Qualified Doc  preferably a Specialist in this field of medicine.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Looks like all back stuff to me, unless they mention altered gait or something somewhere else. I’m 40% back plus bilateral radiculopathy so I can’t feel my toes. My gait is altered because of it. My bilateral rating for numbness is more than I’d get for any gait issues, though ( or may include it, I don’t remember the exact wording) so if you have numbness and pain shooting down your legs you might look into that. It’s under partial paralysis of sciatic nerve.

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

yes well maybe a hadit member that as a condition such as yours can chime in here and let you know what all is needed? , some conditions can cause a secondary condition and the claim would be a secondary claim to that S.C. Condition

Either way you need to talk to your Dr about this  ask him these questions  because your going to need this information coming from a Qualified Dr

our opinions do not count. but  a member that has a related condition such as yours maybe able to help you.  keep watching your post.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

I read your report.  My translation:

Your doctors report "did not" opine on the etiology of the arthritis of your knees.  You need an etiology opinion, however, to get SC.  (An etiology opinion is the docs opinion of what caused your disorders.  Were they caused in service?  Were they secondary to your current SC conditions?  We dont know and your doctor did not make such an opinion in this report)

My advice:  Reveiew the rest of your medical records and your cfile.  Read them.  Here is what to look for:  Look for the phrase "at least as likely as not".  If one of your doctors made this opinion, then you probably have your etiology you need for service connection. 

If, after review of your records, there is no such statment "at least as likely as not" , then you will likely need to get an IMO to get SC.  However, you can go ahead and file, but I suggest at the same time you consider getting a private medical opinion. (IMO), because you will need that, unless its already there, to get sc for your back issues.  

My suggestion is you "not" apply for :

Quote

non-ribbearing vertebral bodies. There is preservation of

normal lumbosacral lordosis....more medical mumbo jumbo terms....

Instead, apply for a back pain issue because a different doc may well diagnose you with something different, whether or not he reads this docs report.  You dont need to be a doctor to get benefits, just apply for a back problem..dont try to be as specific as this quote.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use