Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

 Ask Your VA Claims Question  

 Read Current Posts 

  Read Disability Claims Articles 
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users |  Search  | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

C & P Results

Rate this question


SpaceAce54

Question

I just viewed my C&P results for CAD/IHD secondary to DMII on blue button after waiting the now required 30 days, I think they were positive for the most part.

The examiner stated it was more likely than not 50% or more related to DMII.

Items of issue are in ref. to MET rating of 5-7 and in ref. to scar from surgery I told the examiner it was still painful but he marked on the DBQ no pain.

Do I just wait for the rating and file an NOD or is there something I should do ahead of receiving a decision, I have an appointment with my cardiologist this month an plan on asking him what my MET is.

Any and all info is appreciated.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

You have to wait for the decision to reach you!  You will need to file an appeal and move forward at that time.  You can get a doctors opinion to help you write a statement for you.  

As for the painful scaring you could go to you VA hospital and ask to talk to the Chief in-charge of the C&P office.  Take a copy of your C&P show it to them and explain how you do have painful scaring.  Ask for a new C&P.  Better hurry before they close with a poor decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

@SpaceAce54 You might want to check the rating criteria to see what it says. I also have CAD/IHD and assume they would use DC 7005 to rate it. They could rate it using a different DC. There is a lot of different diagnoses and criteria for the heart ratings, so it would be educational to check it out. Once your rating decision arrives, check it against your C&P, medical records, and the rating criteria to ensure they granted you an accurate percentage.

Based on the table below, it looks like you might get a 30% rating. Keep in mind that the higher percentages have different criteria. For example, if your ejection fraction happened to be between 30 and 50%, you could qualify for 60%. That may be indicated on your C&P results.

§4.104   Schedule of ratings—cardiovascular system.

Quote
7005   Arteriosclerotic heart disease (Coronary artery disease):  
With documented coronary artery disease resulting in:  
Chronic congestive heart failure, or; workload of 3 METs or less results in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope, or; left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of less than 30 percent 100
More than one episode of acute congestive heart failure in the past year, or; workload of greater than 3 METs but not greater than 5 METs results in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope, or; left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 30 to 50 percent 60
Workload of greater than 5 METs but not greater than 7 METs results in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope, or; evidence of cardiac hypertrophy or dilatation on electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, or X-ray 30
Workload of greater than 7 METs but not greater than 10 METs results in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope, or; continuous medication required 10
Note: If nonservice-connected arteriosclerotic heart disease is superimposed on service-connected valvular or other non-arteriosclerotic heart disease, request a medical opinion as to which condition is causing the current signs and symptoms.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hello VYNC

My EF rating on from the C&P examiner was 50%, my Cardiologist report said 45-50% and MET 5-7 which puts me in the middle.

I wonder which way they will go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

@SpaceAce54 If you are granted SC for CAD, that would place the rating at 60% based on the EF rating. Depending on your prognosis and circumstances, the VA may or may not expect the condition to improve and bring you back later for re-eval.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

It was attached successfully.

The medical opinion looks good (in my non-professional opinion). They gave the 50% or greater jargon and indicated DMII is a well-known risk factor for CAD with the rationale.

The LVEF is 50% as you indicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use