Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Fund HadIt.com

    $2,153.00 of $1,500.00 Donate Now
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0

BVA and SOC/Ramp narrative changes


So, awaiting my hearing - filed in April 2019 - originally went through PEB/MEB - then filed my "first" claim in 2015


This is something that has been sitting in the back of my mind about my claim (4 contentions in appeal, TBI, back, bilateral neuropathy, etc.) that has me puzzled.

When my VSO and I sat down an looked over the paperwork for filing, I took note that my other issues on appeal are being claimed as secondary to tbi. I feel as if trying to SC on secondary may be in question, though the SC is not.

I'm wondering if this may hurt my claim or not because it wasn't until recently that I was SC'd for PTSD(after 3 years and several denials) (Claimed as MST/PTSD - however, there is also evidence of other personal assault(s)...)

I'm focused particularly on my Nexus statements, all of which are from VA Doc's, (and 3 Nexus' in particular) - the Nexus(s) im referring to for tbi does not include a rationale that speaks about the ptsd, but instead notes some other "significant" events leading to tbi.

I have a diagnosis for TBI, but on the last denial it stated that it wasn't a "conclusive" diagnosis.

...what are they talking about???


It says outright on the page(s).

First - the IME/IMO done by the VA specialist - an MD -

"Based on my initial evaluation, and his medical records, I am treating him for symptoms related to a traumatic brain injury resulting from trauma that occurred during his military service."

As if this quote wasn't enough, the next one says (my local VA doc, also an MD),

"I concur with the diagnosis of TBI caused by ..."This was confirmed on 2 separate visits to XXX" .... on active duty" - "It is my medical opinion that it is more likely than not that the current symptoms of TBI .... are a direct consequence of the injury(ies) he sustained on active duty."


I noted that the narrative also changed on the reasons and basis between the SOC and the Denial letter.

Ramp decision for denial ( Jan 2019 ) - "You were previously denied SC because the evidence at the time did not show an event, disease, or injury, nothing in STR's, and no current Diagnosis.

STR's show a consult from (Neuro 2012)  which you reported a syncope episode (Blackout) with no history of a head injury or trauma (WHAAATTT!?!? - Red flag here..when you combine with the details from lay evidence - it was witnessed my head struck first, this was also reported to this particular doctor (again 2012) but for some unknown reason, he failed to list it as such) I wish this record could be amended, but instead I'm just using other evidence so they just toss it out. - Ironically this was also noted as a favorable finding because when the good doctor quoted me, he did put in his report that I had an episode of syncope.

"In support of your claim you submitted a lay statement from X which indicates a personal knowledge or observation of etc etc. The lay evidence, however, was not found to be competent and sufficient in this case to establish a link, or to establish that such a link has been found by a medical professional. ----( Not anymore! )

I re-filed in 2017 but they basically threw it out again for "VA treatment records from x to x show that you were seen for symptoms that possibly were due to a TBI. However, CONCLUSIVE findings did not show a Dx of TBI" (To which I had submitted evidence stating otherwise)


"RD dated...denies for no STR's with complaints, treatment, or diagnosis"...Here it says "You stated on your NOD the the injury occurred prior to your deployment....you also submitted a lay statement that you injured your head in XXX, however on XXX You told Dr. X - that you suffered a head injury during deployment. ---- If it happened on active duty, it happened during service right? What are they getting at here? Injuries that could have caused TBI occurred both BEFORE and DURING deployment, I feel like this is them trying to attack credibility.

"On XX your were treated for your vision symptoms by Dr. X - There YOU reported and Dr. X recorded that you denied a history of head trauma and head injury. Your STR's from 2012 list a history  of health problems and complaints that you had in service. Head trauma, brain injury, or falling is not listed. Dr. X statement, recording what you stated while receiving medical treatment for a different issue is contemporaneous to your military service and convincing evidence that you most likely did not incur a head injury or TBI in service. Service connection remains denied. -- (hold up, did they just Opine this via SOC? LOL, didn't know that was a thing)

The Nexus for my back injuries and the latter came from my PCP that opined that my back injury was DIRECTLY service connected. - What's your thoughts here on this with regard to what was mentioned above?

I don't know how the VA will eventually connect these contentions, and can only assume how this may pan out.


Anything else that could help me here in preparing for BVA that I'm missing?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Answers 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Posts

It is unfortunately standard procedure for VA raters and even DROs to totally ignore any and all medical and other evidence including strong evidence in support of your claim and thus requiring you to

Got this covered, bringing it with me into the hearing!   Done! - I appreciate the update! I'll be taking some more evidence with me on my way up! @Dustoff 11 @GBArmy @Buck52 Tha

For you benefit, work up the timeline of everything from the time you got the TBI. Use the records that are listed in your denial (evidence) and go date by date, line by line, every event that has tra

Recommended Posts

  • 0

SOmething to pay attention to.

When you get a C&P exam with a bad opinion you can challenge that with peer reviewed medical literature.  Most of the time, these opinions fail to identify any source proving the basis for the opinion. This can be challenged with medical literature from valid sources.

I can access college library with links to professional journals, as well as Google Scholar that also provides links to professional journal articles. These are  peer reviewed, and considered equal in weight to any opinion that a medical professional can provide. Anyone can use web sites as well that help find articles from journals that are recognized and authored by medical professionals, such as

https://medlineplus.gov/ , 

https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional , 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ , 

and Va HealthEVet also has a library with links.

Example: Opinion from C&P exam states that there is no way that your service connected left leg condition can cause your shoulder injury. Claim denied. Request for reconsideration with new evidence can be submitted without an expensive IMO from a medical professional.

New evidence include studies reported in Medical Journals stating that radiculopathy with foot drop frequently cause falls, and more studies that shoulder injuries are commonly caused by falls. Reconsideration includes 3-6 opinions each on both falls and injuries, which disproves the claim that there is no connection between your left leg condition and your shoulder injury. Results: award of 20% for shoulder injury because you proved that the examiner was a clown.


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Folks, this was never about a bad C&P exam - this was about a Dr. that did not properly document what was told to him back in 2012 regarding the incident that had occurred - leaving out the important detail that when I blacked out, I hit my head. Sorry for any confusion. He never gave a diagnosis for TBI either as a part of this because he was evaluating  with the assumption that there was no head injury to begin with., and somehow decided to just keep rolling with the incorrect information.

Edited by awgv001
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I think I may have found an answer.... Since migraines (can be) are secondary to TBI I wonder how this argument would work since the original claim didn't provide "causation" to the origin of the migraines...nor was a TBI diagnosed until years later.

I bolded an important part because this may be a "loophole" to getting my SC TBI backdated properly....maybe?

III.iv.5.C.3.g.  Correlation Between Effective Date for Primary and Secondary SC Disabilities 

The effective date assigned for a secondary SC disability cannot be earlier than the effective date assigned for the causal or primary SC disability. 
When a claim for SC for a disability is pending and subsequent development of the claim reveals that the disability is caused by a disability that may be associated with service, the decision maker must investigate the possibility of SC for the unclaimed causal disability as well as SC on a secondary basis for the claimed disability.   
  • The duty to investigate SC for the causal disability as within scope of the claimed issue is prompted when
    • the claimed disability is shown to be secondary to the unclaimed causal disability, and
    • when the criteria under 38 CFR 3.159(c)(4) have been satisfied.
  • If the causal or primary disability is, in fact, related to service, the pending claim reasonably encompasses a claim for benefits for the causal disability. 
  • The effective date of benefits for the causal disability is guided by the date of receipt of the claim for the secondary disability.
Example:  A Veteran claims SC for right leg pain and numbness.  Development of the claim confirms a diagnosis of radiculopathy that is secondary to an unclaimed back injury.  The back injury was sustained in service.  Sufficient evidence to establish SC for the back disability is of record.  Consider the unclaimed back disability within scope of the claimed radiculopathy and establish SC for both issues with an effective date assigned based on the date of receipt of the claim for SC for radiculopathy.
References:  For more information on
Edited by awgv001
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
  • Moderator


if you suffer from a TBI you may have all kinds of Medical problems in the future.

  You may want to check out all the Symptoms a TBI can cause and see if you have any of those?...you be surprised at all these symptoms..if you have any of these symptoms=

   please file a claim on them  rather or not they maybe secondary claims   get your claim in today!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Ads

  • Ads

  • Similar Content

    • By Hucast21
      My attorney sent an argument letter in lieu of a hearing, and I couldn’t be any happier.
      The argument letter starts with a medical history (chronological order) of complaints and treatment of my conditions from in-service documentation as well as current VA records.
      Then the argument letter highlights the well-reasoned analysis of an IME by a board-certified specialist, in which it contradicts the C&P examiner’s rationale and gives a nexus in VA verbiage.
      I am very impressed of the contents of the argument as it also cites past CAVC cases when arguing for service-connection.
      Now, it’s just a waiting game. Thank goodness my claim is AOD.
    • By Buck52
      Sorry kinda personal  post.
      Need  a little information on the VA Hospital.
      If the VA only has one Dr  to do prostate surgery? or scrotum surgery?..do we have to use him?
      I do not want students  getting their education on me or my body.
      I am fearful of that type medical practice.
      My VAMC only has one Dr in Urology  the rest are students doing their residency.
      I am not sure yet  on this surgery  or what is wrong  but something is wrong down south.  some type of growth growing?  no pain no blood are any dizzyness  just a slight dull drag on my right side and scrotum is swelled and red  but no pain....kinda feels like a fluid  and or a cyst? from what I've read about.
      I am hoping meds will work so I don't have to have this surgery.
      If we have a choice  I may want to get the mission act program  to out source me  I know a good urologist Doc. 
      Anyone know?
      Thanks  in Advance  to all my brothers and sister veterans  out there and members here on hadit.
    • By Hucast21
      Hi all,
      My BVA hearing is scheduled in April, but my attorney is going to submit a written argument and waive hearing request. Has anyone had any experience with this and does this speed up the claims process? Any information will be greatly appreciated.
      Thank you
    • By brokensoldier244th
      Okay guys and girls, gather round the fire. This is a bit of a read, but THIS is the best private doctor submitted opinion Ive come across while Ive been 'on the inside'. Most of the ones I see are a paragraph or two, wishy washing around about the condition, and the doctors opinion- with no WHY, other than "I'm the doctor, and I examined them and this is why I think so.....". That doesn't really cut it. Yes, I know that C and P docs don't do anything this extensive, either, most of the time, and I can't defend that either, but this particular condition that they are claiming is already thorny, and its 'by way of'  another caused by an SC disability. 
      For those of you with OSA caused by obesity that have been shot down, do a word (CTRL-F) search for the word "intermediate" as in "intermediate condition". There is an interesting tidbit on that page RE obesity specifically, and this was how I claimed my OSA in 2014 when I appealed, minus the VA letter, since it hadn't been written yet. This was my doctors chain of thought on my OSA as well. 
      Read this, and give it some thought when you are constructing your claims, and writing your boilerplates for your doc to sign after examining you. I have no idea what this persons rating will be, or if they will prevail, but damn if this didn't stick out as what I would want to see, as a rater, if I was one. This resembles a few of my later claims that I filed for myself in its construction and layout, minus the calling myself a doctor. The overall layout and organization is on point, and will make it easy for whomever gets it. 
    • By KC3
      Has anyone had experience with the RAMP BVA? I elected to see a veterans law judge.
      I fought and got mine accepted by the BVA with a date of November 2019. 
  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • I already get compensation for bladder cancer for Camp Lejeune Water issue, now that it is added to Agent Orange does it mean that the VA should pay me the difference between Camp Lejeune and 1992 when I retired from the Marine Corps or do I have to re-apply for it for Agent Orange, or will the VA look at at current cases already receiving bladder cancer compensation. I’m considered 100% Disabled Permanently 
      • 10 replies
    • 5,10, 20 Rule
      The 5, 10, 20 year rules...

      Five Year Rule) If you have had the same rating for five or more years, the VA cannot reduce your rating unless your condition has improved on a sustained basis. All the medical evidence, not just the reexamination report, must support the conclusion that your improvement is more than temporary.

      Ten Year Rule) The 10 year rule is after 10 years, the service connection is protected from being dropped.

      Twenty Year Rule) If your disability has been continuously rated at or above a certain rating level for 20 or more years, the VA cannot reduce your rating unless it finds the rating was based on fraud. This is a very high standard and it's unlikely the rating would get reduced.

      If you are 100% for 20 years (Either 100% schedular or 100% TDIU - Total Disability based on Individual Unemployability or IU), you are automatically Permanent & Total (P&T). And, that after 20 years the total disability (100% or IU) is protected from reduction for the remainder of the person's life. "M-21-1-IX.ii.2.1.j. When a P&T Disability Exists"

      At 55, P&T (Permanent & Total) or a few other reasons the VBA will not initiate a review. Here is the graphic below for that. However if the Veteran files a new compensation claim or files for an increase, then it is YOU that initiated to possible review.

      NOTE: Until a percentage is in place for 10 years, the service connection can be removed. After that, the service connection is protected.


      Example for 2020 using the same disability rating

      1998 - Initially Service Connected @ 10%

      RESULT: Service Connection Protected in 2008

      RESULT: 10% Protected from reduction in 2018 (20 years)

      2020 - Service Connection Increased @ 30%

      RESULT: 30% is Protected from reduction in 2040 (20 years)
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 53 replies
    • Post in New BVA Grants
      While the BVA has some discretion here, often they "chop up claims".  For example, BVA will order SERVICE CONNECTION, and leave it up to the VARO the disability percent and effective date.  

      I hate that its that way.  The board should "render a decision", to include service connection, disability percentage AND effective date, so we dont have to appeal "each" of those issues over then next 15 years on a hamster wheel.  
    • Finally heard back that I received my 100% Overall rating and a 100% PTSD rating Following my long appeal process!

      My question is this, given the fact that my appeal was on the advanced docket and is an “Expedited” appeal, what happens now and how long(ish) is the process from here on out with retro and so forth? I’ve read a million things but nothing with an expedited appeal status.

      Anyone deal with this situation before? My jump is from 50 to 100 over the course of 2 years if that helps some. I only am asking because as happy as I am, I would be much happier to pay some of these bills off!
        • Like
      • 13 replies
    • I told reviewer that I had a bad C&P, and that all I wanted was a fair shake, and she even said, that was what she was all ready viewed for herself. The first C&P don't even  reflect my Treatment in the VA PTSD clinic. In my new C&P I was only asked about symptoms, seeing shit, rituals, nightmares, paying bills and about childhood, but didn't ask about details of it. Just about twenty question, and  nothing about stressor,
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines