Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
ROMAD

What do you do when they get a CUE Wrong!

Question

Ok here is the issue. I filed a CUE on my Decision from 1993 because I was rated improperly based on the laws at the time. I submitted the letter explaining the error and noted in my records what the error was. So my CVSO looked at the Decision today and it was denied and they show in the Evidence section The MEB decision from the USAF as well as the Rating decision from 1993 and The General Medical Exam (C&P Exam). So they say the considered the evidence but it is in black and white in all those documents that I meet the requirements for the higher level. Additionally one other bar is being employed at the time of the exam, and the higher level of disability requires productive of severe economic inadaptability. The Court has stated on numerous occasions that severe economic inadaptability does not mean unemployed or unemployable as that is what IU ratings are for. How can I spell it out any clearer that stating exactly where in my documents it states I meet the requirements  for 50% versus 30%? I was later rated at 50% but from 1993 to 2006 it should have been the higher level. Can you CUE a CUE?  Do you request a Higher Level Review? What is the next step.

image.thumb.png.0e8c74c7802e955e387ac949846d2cbd.png

 And here is the 1993  Decision Letter

image.thumb.png.fad109617656143434e6efab838d6303.png

and The C&P Exam

image.thumb.png.8e20d8e562a234985afc90afd66c0ed7.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Were the court rulings from before or after your rating decision was made? If they were from before, by all means use them. If after, you can't use them because they were not in effect at the time (unless it is one like Nehmer, which was retroactive).

https://www.knowva.ebenefits.va.gov/system/templates/selfservice/va_ssnew/help/customer/locale/en-US/portal/554400000001018/content/554400000015808/M21-1,-Part-III,-Subpart-iv,-Chapter-2,-Section-B---Revision-of-Decisions

Quote

III.iv.2.B.4.d.  Considering Requests for Revision Based on CUE

 
Although there is no specific claim form required to request revision of a decision based on CUE, the request must be submitted in writing and signed by either the claimant or his/her authorized representative.
 
In a valid claim of CUE, the claimant must set forth clearly and specifically the alleged error, or errors, of fact or law in the prior decision, the legal or factual basis for such allegations, and why the result would have been manifestly different but for the alleged error. 
 
Notes:
  • A claimant is not entitled to request CUE again once there has been a final decision denying CUE on the same basis.
  • If the CUE alleged is different from a CUE issue previously rejected, use a rating to determine whether or not a CUE was made on the new issue.

I'm no CUE expert, but based on that, it sounds like you are in good shape to appeal as long as you don't let the appeal clock expire. Just don't let the decision become finalized. 

Did they send include the usual right to appeal form indicating supplemental/HLR/BVA?

It is kind of strange because a CUE is a motion to review. I didn't see anything in that M21-1 link that says you cannot CUE a CUE.

In your CUE submission, did you just point out an error and let them figure it out? Or did you spell out specific laws in effect at the time that were not followed?

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Yes, there is no reason you cannot CUE a CUE denial but I don't advise doing that-

I feel you should request an HLR.

Can you scan and attach the Horners criteria from the VA rating schedule used for the 1993 decision?

Did you have at that time ( and did VA know it) that this disability caused you time off from work, within performance appraisals or anything of that nature?

I feel something ( as evidence)produced the 2006 rating, that was missing ,as evidence, in the 1993 rating.

As Vync said:

"In your CUE submission, did you just point out an error and let them figure it out? Or did you spell out specific laws in effect at the time that were not followed?"

Did you make a solid argument with the rating schedule of 1993 ,compared to the evidence they had, that would warrant the higher rating in the past?

Was the correct diagnostic code used in the 1993 rating?

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

      ...................Buck
        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      doc00580220191213082945.pdf
      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines