Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Vync

Caluza and The Credibility Trap

Question

This is a short article from 2015 which discussed how the Caluza ruling introduced adversarial factors into the VA's non-adversarial claims process.

 

Daniel L. Nagin, The Credibility Trap: Notes on a VA Evidentiary Standard, 45 U. Mem. L. Rev. 887 (2015).

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/27814585/Nagin_CredibilityGap.pdf?sequence=1

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
29 minutes ago, Vync said:

This is a short article from 2015 which discussed how the Caluza ruling introduced adversarial factors into the VA's non-adversarial claims process.

Daniel L. Nagin, The Credibility Trap: Notes on a VA Evidentiary Standard, 45 U. Mem. L. Rev. 887 (2015).

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/27814585/Nagin_CredibilityGap.pdf?sequence=1

This is a good read! Thank you for posting this!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
2 hours ago, Vync said:

This is a short article from 2015 which discussed how the Caluza ruling introduced adversarial factors into the VA's non-adversarial claims process.

 

Daniel L. Nagin, The Credibility Trap: Notes on a VA Evidentiary Standard, 45 U. Mem. L. Rev. 887 (2015).

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/27814585/Nagin_CredibilityGap.pdf?sequence=1

This is great! Article may actually have a high amount of relevance to my current claim that I just had a less likely CP for.. I found this bit the most interesting and pertaining to my case regarding the lack of evidence/notes:

 "The record in the case indicated that local law enforcement had informed VA that it did not have records from as long ago as 1966. In scathing language, the Veterans Court declared that "t is hardly logical to derive a negative credibility finding, even in part, because the [veteran's] allegations are not corroborated by nonexistent records.

CP doc stated could not find notes of complaints in my earlier records, however, immediately goes on to state that he saw a note from a slightly later visit that stated I did complain of pain before, etc..

Very interesting, thanks for posting!

Edited by Foxhound6
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Thank you for that enlightening article and confirms what many of us old hand veterans have suspected for many years of filing our own claims and appeals and dealings with the VA and VSOs.  In spite of their ad nasum repeat of giving us vets the benefit of the doubt in our claims and the system being non adversarial this is pure BS on part of VA and Congress.

Although mostly successful I have had claims denied that included strong VA,  Army medical and other evidence to support my lay statements but in their final decision wording the VA pukes made it clear to me they did not believe me or my VA and military medical evidence submitted by simply saying there was no evidence submitted to support my claim which is of course an outright lie on their part and a deliberate insult to me but of course I know who many of the raters are which is no surprise to me.

On the other hand I learned from hard experience in my Vietnam Army unit that many of my fellow vets are not honorable people and like the civilian population will lie like hell to get disability benefits that they do not deserve at the expense of other vets.

 

Edited by Dustoff 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
33 minutes ago, Foxhound6 said:

CP doc stated could not find notes of complaints in my earlier records, however, immediately goes on to state that he saw a note from a slightly later visit that stated I did complain of pain before, etc..

The law says the VA must assume the veteran is credible.

The VA says they will assume the veteran is credible only if they can produce evidence to back up their claims.

 

I had a situation similar to yours back in the 1997. Basically, the doc diagnosed me with something, but then clearly contradicted themselves a several of times.
  I had a lumbar/back claim where I verbally told the doc I had experienced pain, but not every day. They noted it. In one question they stated "motion stops when pain begins". But then in the next question about measuring painful motion, they state that it is "not measurable". Back then, the spine ratings were simply severe/moderate/mild, but under today's standards I fell squarely under the 20% category. The doc went on to diagnose me with DJD of minimal degree, but then stated there was no clinical evidence of disability. The rating decision was very vague and just said there were no acute findings. That one still has me scratching my head. I might have to dig in a bit further to see if it might be CUE worthy.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
12 minutes ago, Dustoff 11 said:

Thank you for that enlightening article and confirms what many of us old hand veterans have suspected for many years of filing our own claims and appeals and dealings with the VA and VSOs.  In spite of their ad nasum repeat of giving us vets the benefit of the doubt in our claims and the system being non adversarial this is pure BS on part of VA and Congress.

In this case, the courts introduced the adversarial aspects. However, having filed claims back in the 90's, I can definitely tell you that I believed it was a very adversarial process.

 

14 minutes ago, Dustoff 11 said:

Although mostly successful I have had claims denied that included strong VA,  Army medical and other evidence to support my lay statements but in their final decision wording the VA pukes made it clear to me they did not believe me or my VA and military medical evidence submitted by simply saying there was no evidence submitted to support my claim which is of course an outright lie on their part and a deliberate insult to me but of course I know who many of the raters are which is no surprise to me.

On the other hand I learned from hard experience in my Vietnam Army unit that many of my fellow vets are not honorable people and like the civilian population will lie like hell to get disability benefits that they do not deserve at the expense of other vets.

Having solid evidence in your record and the VA claiming it does not exist happens way to often. It happened to me when I filed my initial claims. All denied because they said my service treatment records were silent. I found out that they lost the copy of STRs I sent in with my claims. That put me on the appeals wagon from the start and I won some, but not all, of my claimed conditions.

You're definitely right about dirty claims. I was once told that laws and regulations exist because of the mistakes of others. I have no doubt that many claims are frivilous. That's probably why the VA goes out of their way to be adversarial behind the scenes, while claiming the opposite publicly.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

      ...................Buck
        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      doc00580220191213082945.pdf
      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
        • Like
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines