Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0

Caluza and The Credibility Trap


Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

This is a short article from 2015 which discussed how the Caluza ruling introduced adversarial factors into the VA's non-adversarial claims process.

 

Daniel L. Nagin, The Credibility Trap: Notes on a VA Evidentiary Standard, 45 U. Mem. L. Rev. 887 (2015).

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/27814585/Nagin_CredibilityGap.pdf?sequence=1

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Posts

This is a short article from 2015 which discussed how the Caluza ruling introduced adversarial factors into the VA's non-adversarial claims process.   Daniel L. Nagin, The Credibility Trap:

"I wish someone on here who is also active member of the Veterans Benefits Network (VBN) forum would post the above excellent article on that forum as the people who run it are ex VA raters, DROs and

In this case, the courts introduced the adversarial aspects. However, having filed claims back in the 90's, I can definitely tell you that I believed it was a very adversarial process.   H

Recommended Posts

  • 0
29 minutes ago, Vync said:

This is a short article from 2015 which discussed how the Caluza ruling introduced adversarial factors into the VA's non-adversarial claims process.

Daniel L. Nagin, The Credibility Trap: Notes on a VA Evidentiary Standard, 45 U. Mem. L. Rev. 887 (2015).

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/27814585/Nagin_CredibilityGap.pdf?sequence=1

This is a good read! Thank you for posting this!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
2 hours ago, Vync said:

This is a short article from 2015 which discussed how the Caluza ruling introduced adversarial factors into the VA's non-adversarial claims process.

 

Daniel L. Nagin, The Credibility Trap: Notes on a VA Evidentiary Standard, 45 U. Mem. L. Rev. 887 (2015).

https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/27814585/Nagin_CredibilityGap.pdf?sequence=1

This is great! Article may actually have a high amount of relevance to my current claim that I just had a less likely CP for.. I found this bit the most interesting and pertaining to my case regarding the lack of evidence/notes:

 "The record in the case indicated that local law enforcement had informed VA that it did not have records from as long ago as 1966. In scathing language, the Veterans Court declared that "t is hardly logical to derive a negative credibility finding, even in part, because the [veteran's] allegations are not corroborated by nonexistent records.

CP doc stated could not find notes of complaints in my earlier records, however, immediately goes on to state that he saw a note from a slightly later visit that stated I did complain of pain before, etc..

Very interesting, thanks for posting!

Edited by Foxhound6
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Thank you for that enlightening article and confirms what many of us old hand veterans have suspected for many years of filing our own claims and appeals and dealings with the VA and VSOs.  In spite of their ad nasum repeat of giving us vets the benefit of the doubt in our claims and the system being non adversarial this is pure BS on part of VA and Congress.

Although mostly successful I have had claims denied that included strong VA,  Army medical and other evidence to support my lay statements but in their final decision wording the VA pukes made it clear to me they did not believe me or my VA and military medical evidence submitted by simply saying there was no evidence submitted to support my claim which is of course an outright lie on their part and a deliberate insult to me but of course I know who many of the raters are which is no surprise to me.

On the other hand I learned from hard experience in my Vietnam Army unit that many of my fellow vets are not honorable people and like the civilian population will lie like hell to get disability benefits that they do not deserve at the expense of other vets.

 

Edited by Dustoff 11
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
33 minutes ago, Foxhound6 said:

CP doc stated could not find notes of complaints in my earlier records, however, immediately goes on to state that he saw a note from a slightly later visit that stated I did complain of pain before, etc..

The law says the VA must assume the veteran is credible.

The VA says they will assume the veteran is credible only if they can produce evidence to back up their claims.

 

I had a situation similar to yours back in the 1997. Basically, the doc diagnosed me with something, but then clearly contradicted themselves a several of times.
  I had a lumbar/back claim where I verbally told the doc I had experienced pain, but not every day. They noted it. In one question they stated "motion stops when pain begins". But then in the next question about measuring painful motion, they state that it is "not measurable". Back then, the spine ratings were simply severe/moderate/mild, but under today's standards I fell squarely under the 20% category. The doc went on to diagnose me with DJD of minimal degree, but then stated there was no clinical evidence of disability. The rating decision was very vague and just said there were no acute findings. That one still has me scratching my head. I might have to dig in a bit further to see if it might be CUE worthy.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
12 minutes ago, Dustoff 11 said:

Thank you for that enlightening article and confirms what many of us old hand veterans have suspected for many years of filing our own claims and appeals and dealings with the VA and VSOs.  In spite of their ad nasum repeat of giving us vets the benefit of the doubt in our claims and the system being non adversarial this is pure BS on part of VA and Congress.

In this case, the courts introduced the adversarial aspects. However, having filed claims back in the 90's, I can definitely tell you that I believed it was a very adversarial process.

 

14 minutes ago, Dustoff 11 said:

Although mostly successful I have had claims denied that included strong VA,  Army medical and other evidence to support my lay statements but in their final decision wording the VA pukes made it clear to me they did not believe me or my VA and military medical evidence submitted by simply saying there was no evidence submitted to support my claim which is of course an outright lie on their part and a deliberate insult to me but of course I know who many of the raters are which is no surprise to me.

On the other hand I learned from hard experience in my Vietnam Army unit that many of my fellow vets are not honorable people and like the civilian population will lie like hell to get disability benefits that they do not deserve at the expense of other vets.

Having solid evidence in your record and the VA claiming it does not exist happens way to often. It happened to me when I filed my initial claims. All denied because they said my service treatment records were silent. I found out that they lost the copy of STRs I sent in with my claims. That put me on the appeals wagon from the start and I won some, but not all, of my claimed conditions.

You're definitely right about dirty claims. I was once told that laws and regulations exist because of the mistakes of others. I have no doubt that many claims are frivilous. That's probably why the VA goes out of their way to be adversarial behind the scenes, while claiming the opposite publicly.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Ads

  • Ads

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Post in New BVA Grants
      While the BVA has some discretion here, often they "chop up claims".  For example, BVA will order SERVICE CONNECTION, and leave it up to the VARO the disability percent and effective date.  

      I hate that its that way.  The board should "render a decision", to include service connection, disability percentage AND effective date, so we dont have to appeal "each" of those issues over then next 15 years on a hamster wheel.  
    • Finally heard back that I received my 100% Overall rating and a 100% PTSD rating Following my long appeal process!

      My question is this, given the fact that my appeal was on the advanced docket and is an “Expedited” appeal, what happens now and how long(ish) is the process from here on out with retro and so forth? I’ve read a million things but nothing with an expedited appeal status.

      Anyone deal with this situation before? My jump is from 50 to 100 over the course of 2 years if that helps some. I only am asking because as happy as I am, I would be much happier to pay some of these bills off!
        • Like
      • 13 replies
    • I told reviewer that I had a bad C&P, and that all I wanted was a fair shake, and she even said, that was what she was all ready viewed for herself. The first C&P don't even  reflect my Treatment in the VA PTSD clinic. In my new C&P I was only asked about symptoms, seeing shit, rituals, nightmares, paying bills and about childhood, but didn't ask about details of it. Just about twenty question, and  nothing about stressor,
    • This is the latest Compensation & Pension (C&P) Clinicians Guide dated 20180719. The only other one I've seen is dated 2002, including the one on this website and the VA website. I got this from my claims agent, who got it from the VA.

      VA Compensation & Pension (C&P) Clinicians Guide 2 Final Corrected 20180719.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 12 replies
    • I don’t say thank you enough to all of you...
      You, yes you, are the reason HadIt.com has remained a resource-rich resource. Thousands come each month to read, ask questions, or to feel a sense of community.

      Last month June 2020, we over 50k visitors they viewed over 160k pages. Veterans and their advocates, spouses, children, and friends of veterans come looking for answers. Because we have posts dating back 15 years and articles on the home page, they usually can find an answer or at least get pointed in the right direction.

      You all made that possible. Thank you.
        • Like
      • 8 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines