-
-
Commonly Claimed Disabilities
Tinnitus | PTS(D) | Lumbosacral Cervical Strain | Scars | Limitation of flexion, knee | Diabetes | Paralysis of Siatic Nerve | Limitation of motion, ankle | Degenerative Arthritis Spine | TBI – Traumatic Brain Injury
- 0
When can you file a CUE based on m21-1 and 38 CFR
Please post your question as a New Topic by clicking this link and choosing which forum to post in.
For almost everything you are going to want to post in VA Claims Research.
If this is your first time posting. Take a moment and read our Guidelines. It will inform you of what is and isn't acceptable and tips on getting your questions answered.
Remember, everyone who comes here is a volunteer. At one point, they went to the forums looking for information. They liked it here and decided to stay and help other veterans. They share their personal experience, providing links to the law and reference materials and support because working on your claim can be exhausting and beyond frustrating.
This thread may still provide value to you and is worth at least skimming through the responses to see if any of them answer your question. Knowledge Is Power, and there is a lot of knowledge in older threads.
-
Our picks
-
VA Will No Longer Drop Coverage of Veterans Being Cared for at Home
Tbird posted a topic in VA Disability Claims Articles and VA News,
NBC10’s Lucy Bustamante has details on the Department of Veterans Affairs making changes to its at-home care reevaluations.
-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Attorney Wants Diagnosis for Secondary Complication to Rated Condition; Must it be through VA?
Cat4Christ777 posted a question in IMO Independent Medical Opinion,
Originally, this secondary condition was claimed as 'migraines,' but while it may begin as a migraine with a complication, the VA can--and has, more than once--made it so much worse (pain-wise). If it does not qualify as a migraine, then my attorney and I need to come up with a different diagnosis. It's definitely a neurological issue, possibly 'occipital neuralgia,' as the condition meets the criteria of its definition, here: https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/occipital+neuralgia.-
- 24 replies
-
-
VA Life insurance program coming January 2023 for Veterans with service connection
Tbird posted a topic in VA Disability Claims Articles and VA News,
In January 2023, VA will launch a new life insurance program called Veterans Affairs Life Insurance (VALife), which provides guaranteed acceptance whole life insurance coverage to Veterans age 80 and under, with any level of service-connected disability. Some Veterans age 81 and older may also be eligible.-
-
- 2 replies
-
-
I found this quiet Interesting supreme court decison
Buck52 posted a question in VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims Research Forum,
click the link to read about this.
https://usmilitary.org/supreme-court-decision-may-affect-veterans-across-the-us-wave-disability-deadline-for-thousands/
From the Article
-
-
- 33 replies
-
-
VA Math, Confusing, Right? Calculate Your Final Rating Percentage!
Tbird posted a blog entry in Tbirds Blog,
10 + 50 = 50 and other VA math mysteries explained.
VA Math It’s Not Your Mother’s Arithmetic
“VA Math” is the way that the VA computes combined impairment ratings for multiple conditions in a Veteran’s compensation benefits claim – and it requires that you unlearn real math. When a Veteran has multiple medical conditions that are service-connected and the Veterans Affairs rates each at a different percentage, it would seem that they should just add up your percentages to get to a total body impairment rating.-
- 4 replies
-
-
-
Popular Contributors
Question
kanewnut 101
Binding decisions are those issued by the RO that are not yet over one year old( finally adjudicated decisions). These binding decisions can have a CUE filed on them according to the following M21-1 and 38 CFR citations. No matter what the RO calls it when a corrected decision is issued you are still allowed to file a CUE on a binding decision from what I read here. I really don't care if they call it CUE, "rating revision" or whatever, I am only interested in the granting of benefits. I hope this is at least as clear as mud.
M21-1 ADJUDICATION PROCEDURES MANUAL, pt. III, subpt. iv, ch. 7, sect. B
III.iv.7.B.3.c. Procedure for Correction of Rating Decisions
When a correction of an entitlement outcome is required for an issued decision that is binding, there must be
CUE under the provisions of 38 CFR 3.105(a) and M21-1, Part III, Subpart iv, 2.B.4
III.iv.7.B.3.d. Revising Erroneous Anatomical Qualifiers
Example: An original award of SC of gunshot wound to the left thigh, rather than the actual right thigh, is a CUE subject to correction under 38 CFR 3.105(a).
A CUE decision, under 38 CFR 3.105(a), is for application when previous determinations are binding.
M21-1, Part III, Subpart iv, Chapter 2, Section B - Revision of Decisions
1. Finality of Decisions
Introduction This topic contains general information on revising prior determinations, including
binding determinations
significance of binding determinations
finally adjudicated claims
binding but not finally adjudicated claims, and
revising binding decisions.
III.iv.2.B.1.b. Significance of Binding Determinations
Binding determinations are not subject to revision except by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA), by Federal court order, or as provided in 38 CFR 3.105, 38 CFR 3.2500, and 38 CFR 3.2600.
§3.105 Revision of decisions.
(2) Error in binding decisions prior to final adjudication. Prior to the time that a claim is finally adjudicated, previous decisions which are binding will be accepted as correct by the agency of original jurisdiction, with respect to the evidentiary record and law existing at the time of the decision, unless the decision is clearly erroneous, after considering whether any favorable findings may be reversed as provided in §3.104(c).
§ 3.104 Binding nature of decisions.
(b) Binding administrative determinations. Current determinations of line of duty, character of discharge, relationship, dependency, domestic relations questions, homicide, and findings of fact of death or presumptions of death made in accordance with existing instructions, and by application of the same criteria and based on the same facts, by either an Adjudication activity or an Insurance activity are binding one upon the other in the absence of clear and unmistakable error.
(c) Favorable findings. Any finding favorable to the claimant made by either a VA adjudicator, as described in § 3.103(f)(4), or by the Board of Veterans' Appeals, as described in § 20.801(a) of this chapter, is binding on all subsequent agency of original jurisdiction and Board of Veterans' Appeals adjudicators, unless rebutted by evidence that identifies a clear and unmistakable error in the favorable finding. For purposes of this section, a finding means a conclusion either on a question of fact or on an application of law to facts made by an adjudicator concerning the issue(s) under review.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
Popular Days
May 3
1
Top Posters For This Question
kanewnut 1 post
Popular Days
May 3 2020
1 post
Popular Posts
kanewnut
Binding decisions are those issued by the RO that are not yet over one year old( finally adjudicated decisions). These binding decisions can have a CUE filed on them according to the following M21-1 a
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts