Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Another Grant. Again, use an IMO

Rate this question


MikeHunt

Question

As I've stressed, use a doctor's opinion. You will win.

Go to your state's Military Affairs department to file- They have the best financed VSO- in my state, it happens to be they chose The Legion- Yours may be different.

Don't communicate with the VA- use the VSO. You are in, essentially, a trial- Calling the other side wouldn't be a good idea- and it isn't here. In short, they're not telling the Legion they called to drop your claim.

This site is becoming FAR to confusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
16 hours ago, deedub75 said:

I kept getting denied by the same VA nurse practitioner for bogus reasons and each time it went back to her she made up new reasons to deny me. I asked my VSO how to get my claims away from this NP and they told me get send it to BVA or get an IMO. I didn't want to send it back to BVA because they were the ones who remanded my claim back to the original VA NP who kept denying me in the first place. I typed up a nexus letter that I found on the internet and asked my personal orthopedic surgeon if he would support me. I gave him the letter that I typed basically as a template and told him he could add or change things in the letter that he saw fit. He just took the letter that I typed up, put it on his letterhead, signed it and mailed it to me. I submitted it as a supplemental claim and I was sent to a contractor for new exams and all claims were finally granted. 

@deedub75that is great.  I know vets find it hard to find local docs/specialists who will do this sometimes, and i have had the same experience often.  Alot of docs look at these requests like your asking them to help you in some insurance fraud against a gas station for slipping outside the door.  If you dont have the money for the IMO then you may have to ask around, pay the co pay for a initial counseling and just lay it all out. Alot of doctors dont know how the VA system works and are totally unaware that they will use NP's to determine a neurology issue and without their help thats basically the end of the road.  Youre going to pay either way when you seek a imo/supporting medical information, either in cash up front or time & anxiety trying to find a local doc to help you out. Its not fair but thats the world.

And to hit this again yes IMO docs charge what seems like alot but as has been said they spent thousands and thousands of hours to gain the expertise they have now and that expertise is what makes his/her words more powerful to the VA and thats what youre paying for.  Doctors should be paid for their time both in writing the IMO and the time they spent getting to that point just like everyone else.

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I think the key component for physicians to remember for an IMO or Nexus statement is it isn't legally binding, it only asks for a 51% percent rationale on causation of a medical issue.

Through training, school, experience, and physiology a doctor should be able to submit his opinion on a medical issue in their specialty. 

Once its explained like that, they normally have little or no issue with offering an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
48 minutes ago, Fat said:

I think the key component for physicians to remember for an IMO or Nexus statement is it isn't legally binding, it only asks for a 51% percent rationale on causation of a medical issue.

Through training, school, experience, and physiology a doctor should be able to submit his opinion on a medical issue in their specialty. 

Once its explained like that, they normally have little or no issue with offering an opinion.

great point

70% - PTSD

->50% - OSA (Secondary to PTSD)

30% - Bilateral Pes Planus w/Plantar Fasciitis

30% - Migraines

10% - Tinnitus

20% - Back

0% - bilateral shin splints

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use