Jump to content
  • 0

Proper route to get additional coding on schedule of ratings



So I am getting juggled a bit between VSO since my awesome last one retired so would appreciate the proper route to take.

I was just rated at at 50% Pes Planus with Plantar Fasciitis under 5276.  This was a supplemental claim for only pes planus that was filed on 02/01/21 with a decision made on 03/12/21.  After speaking with a VSO, who read me the decision letter and raters notes, he said there is no doubt the 50% for pronounced pes planus was justified, but was not sure why they arbitrarily added plantar fasciitis to the decision.  I mentioned to the VSO that effective 02/04/21, a diagnostic code of 5269 - Plantar Fasciitis was added to the schedule of ratings - musculoskeletal system and if it was possible that they combined them under diagnostic code 5676, because that was how it was always done before and the rater did not read or know about the new diagnostic code.  He said that could be the reason.

Just to note, I was diagnosed at the VA with bilateral pes planus in 2017 and given insoles.  I was again seen by the VA for foot pain and bilateral pes planus was again affirmed in 2018 with a different set of insoles.  This last January I again went in with foot pain where pes planus was again affirmed, had another set of insoles cast, and was diagnosed for the first time with bilateral plantar fasciitis and given steroid injections in each foot.

Ultimately I am looking to get the plantar fasciitis rated separately from the pes planus under the new diagnostic code of 5269, which due to the severity and being bilateral would be at 30%.  In fact, my VSO had already submitted an intent to file for bilateral plantar fasciitis, arthritis of both great toes, patellar tendinosis of both knees, arthritis of both knees, and ITB syndrome as being secondary to the pes planus once it was service-connected.  The history of my pes planus dates back to my final physical and I have been receiving treatment for it since 2017 in the form of insoles when it was originally diagnosed with the VA.  It was only this last year that I was diagnosed with plantar fasciitis as a result of the pes planus.

So what route do I take on this supplemental claim?  I feel like a High level Review won't allow me to submit the VA medical records showing that I have been treated unsuccessfully for pes planus since 2017.  Is that something I can bring up in the phone conversation with the reviewer to get the plantar fasciitis rated separately under 5269?  I am not submitting any new evidence so to speak, but literally VA medical records that were already in the system for years.  The other question is, does the new diagnostic rating for plantar fasciitis even apply to me?  I filed on 02/01/21 and the new rating schedule went into effect on 02/04/21.

I want to fight this decision because I am already rated at 70% with CAD, DMII, and Tinnitus.  Getting the plantar fasciitis rated separately would be the difference between an 86% rating rounding up to 90% and 92% rounding down to 90%.  This does not include the issues secondary to the pes planus like the arthritis and tendinosis that are under my current intent to file.           

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Patron

"Can I get VA disability for both flat feet and plantar fasciitis?

No, both of them together won’t be able to get a rating, but the VA is required to give you the highest rating whenever two disabilities exclude each other."

I copied the above from a legal site on the innerweb.  I also think you can only be rated for one, or get the highest of the two ratings.  So if you have a 30 and a 50, they will only give you the fifty.

They are both the same part of the foot, and one causes the other, etc.

However, the regulation has changed and a new rating has been added, but I think that is for Veterans like me who have plantar, but not flat feet.  In the past, there was not a direct rating for us.

What you are trying to do is new (because of the regulation) and therefore ground breaking.  I don't think you will find precedence.  All I find are rated as one.  

Get a lawyer and go for it, 




Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

So decision letter came in today and things are looking pretty damn good from my point of view.  Gonna abridge non relevant parts to save time  

From my decision letter;

“We have assigned a 50 percent evaluation for your bilateral pes planus based on:

Marked pronation (L/R)

Symptoms NOT improved by orthopedic shoe or appliance (L/R)

Additional symptom(s) include:

Characteristic callosities (L/R)

Indication of swelling on use (L/R)

Objective evidence of marked deformity (L/R)

Pain on manipulation of feet (L/R)

Pain on manipulation of feet, accentuated (L/R)

Pain on use of feet (L/R)

Pain on use of feet, accentuated (L/R)

Weight-bearing line over or medial to great toe (L/R)

This is the highest scheduler evaluation allowed under the law for flatfoot, acquired. (38 CFR 4.57, 38 CFR 4.71a)”

Not a single thing mentioned regarding my plantar fasciitis diagnosis or current steroid injection treatment.  Now the pain on use/manipulation/accentuated may be viewed as possible pyramiding for both conditions, but there are additional symptoms/manifestations of plantar fasciitis that are not covered under the 5276 for pes planus, but are covered under the 5269 plantar fasciitis rating. 

Right now my strategy going forward will be to file for compensation on my current intent to file for issues secondary to the now service-connected pes planus. This includes plantar fasciitis, arthritis of big toes and both knees, ITB syndrome, and patellar tendinosis.  If they deny the plantar fasciitis, but grant the others, I can appeal at that time while still getting a percentage bump and additional bilateral factor bump. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Ads

  • Ads

  • Similar Content

    • By Mr cue
      Ok I understand many feel I just be posting and fighting with va over nothing.
      My old name on hadit was yulooking.
      You can put it in the search and my old post for the cue claim I won will pop up.
      Carlie Berta many other help me and I learn alot from hadit I had no ideal what a cue was until I followed Berta cue back than
      I also used hadit back than to vent lol
      I post all this so that other understand I feel I have more year fight va than some lawyers. And vso
      I have been to the court pro se twice. And won remands for both.
      Fast forward. I am now fight for smc benfits that were never inferred back in 2001.
      Might go back till 1993.
      This is why va is all over the place.
      I was granted smc l aid attendance.
      But I receive in home care pay for by va hospital. Which is smc r.
      All this I got remand from the court to bva to address.
      And it been nothing but games 
      I now have a petition at the cavc which I am just waiting on judge decision on
      I got be the first veteran we're a bva judge stated if I refuse a exam base opinion on my record.
      So yes I don't wait I push.
      Qtc I put in a better business complaint yesterday and call white house line
      Today I get a call from qtc I don't have to go to exam and they got to base there opinion on my record.
      I would never tell a veteran to refuse a exam!
      The reason I can refuse is because my bva remand state this. Because
      I press the bva about having 8 comp Exam for smc benfits. Which are to b based off your record.
      I really just venting.
      Last thing guys if you get a cavc remand.   send these law to bva before they remand. To ro.
      A cavc is not a do over.
      Someiano v. Principi, 17 Vet.App. 305, 312 (2003) (Court noted that it would not be permissible for VA to undertake further development if purpose was to obtain evidence against appellant’s case)

      Adam v. Principi, 256 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2001), (in which the court stated that it would be improper for the Veterans Court to remand a case to the Board to give the DVA another opportunity to develop evidence needed to satisfy an evidentiary burden it had failed to satisfy the first time, i.e., to “attempt to introduce new evidence sufficient to make up the shortfall” in the agency’s proof. Id. At 1322.”
      The board has remand my loss of use under smc to develop evidence to denied loss of use.
      I have a 25 year record of loss of use. I have a va specialized loss of use exam that Address all my loss of use and stated it was the result of my elbow and cervical injury It was a favorable exam. I have bva decision which address my lost of use 2001 2004 and 2012.
      Use the law against them.
    • By andrewdc
      I found Alex on this site almost 4 years ago. I had posted multiple questions as to why VA denied my aid and attendance claim SMC L.  Alex contacted me and agreed to help. He filed a new claim for smc l and of course va denied it. He then filed appeal to bva which was subsequently granted and I was awarded smc L. However I have 2 separate and distinct 100% ratings so I should have been awarded smc M. So, Alex submitted  appeal to bva which after a year they closed appeal because they thought we were appealing original bva decision. We were not appealing decision just the m versus l. So Alex filed a new claim for m and va denied. Alex filed supplemental claim and va closed the claim without even adjudicating. He filed Again and same result. He made another attempt and that was denied too. Finally Alex contacted the secretary bva, the regional office coaches and raters claiming they had no idea how to adjudicate smc claims.  Obviously he ruffled a few feathers and the truth needed to be said. Finally after more than 36 months of fighting, the VA admitted making 2 mistakes. They admitted the effective date for my original l should have been 6 months earlier and they admitted m should have been awarded when aid and attendance was granted. Bottom line- Alex knows more than va when it comes to SMC. Alex is a kind person who always listed to our concerns and always keep us in the loop. If you need thoughtful assistance with your smc and or claims in general, no one knows better than our friend Alex. 
       Andrew & Linda
    • By 63Charlie
      My battle with the VA continues.
      Got some appeals at the CAVC.
      I have other appeals at the Board.
      Looks like my attorneys are fighting hard for me at the CAVC
      I wonder how long it takes to get a CAVC decision?
      Daniels Rule 33 Summary of the Issues.pdf
    • By runaroundtime
      I am looking for a little advice on how to proceed with my current claim.  After several years of TBI treatment with the local VA hospital, I filed for a TBI claim.  I am still awaiting the decision but just received my C-File that I requested a few months ago.  From what I can tell, my DBQ DR did a horrible job and I am going to get underrated when the final decision comes.  I was in and out within 25 minutes and no testing was performed.  Once I told the DR that I had already done Neuropsych testing with the VA hospital the exam ended shortly after.  When viewing my C-File and the record of the TBI DBQ exam I noticed that the DR service connected my TBI but didn't accurately record the symptoms identified in the Neuropsych exam.  The DR just cut and pasted the Neuropsych summary but missed some ptretty big details from the rest of the report.  My DBQ DR listed my TBI symptoms as;
      - Memory, attention, concentration, executive functions - A complaint of mild memory loss (such as having difficulty following a conversation, recalling recent conversations, remembering names of new acquaintances, or finding words, or often misplacing items), attention, concentration, or executive functions, but without objective evidence on testing.
      - Motor activity (with intact motor and sensory system) - Motor activity normal
      - Visual spatial orientation - Normal
      These results were drastically different from my neuropsych exam which listed the following issues;
      My neuropsych exam listed severe impairment of several memory functions, processing speed, visual spatial orientation.   It also listed mild impairment of motor functioning.  
      I am not able to cut and paste the records I have for the Neuyropsych so I can't give the full report without showing my name.  
      Does anyone have experience with a DBQ that is different from VA treatment records?  What should my next steps be?  Should i do a higher level review?  Hire an appeal lawyer?
    • By BionicVet
      I have attached my denied claim for migraines. I have many docs I can attach. I.e buddy letter from my mother ( fractured skull prior to military), and also squad leader that mentions bad landing on military jump service connection ( knocked out). Military entrance exam showing fractured skull. VA NEUROLOGIST stating service connection. Sick call slip headaches. There is more but
      post. But I’ll start with the ones attached. I don’t understand the reasoning for denial . They have rated me earlier with SSD. Aalso they show a history of risk factors … and if you look at my disabilities the denied me hypertension , musculosketal pathology of the cervical spine and chronic opioid use (because of my service connection disabilities) … is that not oxymoron.. no pun intended. Did I make a mistake filing as a secondary to ptsd? I could have filed for a Tbi service aggravation.. but if they won’t service connect me for this than who knows.
      Any input would be great. I won’t post everything I have but this seems to warrant service connection
      if I did not redact anything please let me know.
  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • I already get compensation for bladder cancer for Camp Lejeune Water issue, now that it is added to Agent Orange does it mean that the VA should pay me the difference between Camp Lejeune and 1992 when I retired from the Marine Corps or do I have to re-apply for it for Agent Orange, or will the VA look at at current cases already receiving bladder cancer compensation. I’m considered 100% Disabled Permanently 
      • 20 replies
    • 5,10, 20 Rule
      The 5, 10, 20 year rules...

      Five Year Rule) If you have had the same rating for five or more years, the VA cannot reduce your rating unless your condition has improved on a sustained basis. All the medical evidence, not just the reexamination report, must support the conclusion that your improvement is more than temporary.

      Ten Year Rule) The 10 year rule is after 10 years, the service connection is protected from being dropped.

      Twenty Year Rule) If your disability has been continuously rated at or above a certain rating level for 20 or more years, the VA cannot reduce your rating unless it finds the rating was based on fraud. This is a very high standard and it's unlikely the rating would get reduced.

      If you are 100% for 20 years (Either 100% schedular or 100% TDIU - Total Disability based on Individual Unemployability or IU), you are automatically Permanent & Total (P&T). And, that after 20 years the total disability (100% or IU) is protected from reduction for the remainder of the person's life. "M-21-1-IX.ii.2.1.j. When a P&T Disability Exists"

      At 55, P&T (Permanent & Total) or a few other reasons the VBA will not initiate a review. Here is the graphic below for that. However if the Veteran files a new compensation claim or files for an increase, then it is YOU that initiated to possible review.

      NOTE: Until a percentage is in place for 10 years, the service connection can be removed. After that, the service connection is protected.


      Example for 2020 using the same disability rating

      1998 - Initially Service Connected @ 10%

      RESULT: Service Connection Protected in 2008

      RESULT: 10% Protected from reduction in 2018 (20 years)

      2020 - Service Connection Increased @ 30%

      RESULT: 30% is Protected from reduction in 2040 (20 years)
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 58 replies
    • Post in New BVA Grants
      While the BVA has some discretion here, often they "chop up claims".  For example, BVA will order SERVICE CONNECTION, and leave it up to the VARO the disability percent and effective date.  

      I hate that its that way.  The board should "render a decision", to include service connection, disability percentage AND effective date, so we dont have to appeal "each" of those issues over then next 15 years on a hamster wheel.  
        • Like
    • Finally heard back that I received my 100% Overall rating and a 100% PTSD rating Following my long appeal process!

      My question is this, given the fact that my appeal was on the advanced docket and is an “Expedited” appeal, what happens now and how long(ish) is the process from here on out with retro and so forth? I’ve read a million things but nothing with an expedited appeal status.

      Anyone deal with this situation before? My jump is from 50 to 100 over the course of 2 years if that helps some. I only am asking because as happy as I am, I would be much happier to pay some of these bills off!
        • Like
      • 18 replies
    • I told reviewer that I had a bad C&P, and that all I wanted was a fair shake, and she even said, that was what she was all ready viewed for herself. The first C&P don't even  reflect my Treatment in the VA PTSD clinic. In my new C&P I was only asked about symptoms, seeing shit, rituals, nightmares, paying bills and about childhood, but didn't ask about details of it. Just about twenty question, and  nothing about stressor,
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Fund HadIt.com

    $5,723.00 of $1,500.00 Donate Now
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines