PLEASE ADVISE AS TO HOW RESTRICTED CLAIMS FILES ARE

[Otrgypsy]

My C&P report was so F'd up that the doc has disciplinary exposure with the State medical Board and even a civil action. I am offering her a chance to avoid any complaints. I want to honestly tell her how hard it is for anyone not working on my claim to access the claim file. Please advise.

I would like to be able to tell her that there is a snowball's chance in hell that anyone (particularly her supervisors) on the West Coast will find out she has owned up to and corrected her errors. Is this true? Citations to controlling regs would be great.

Thank you.

[Otrgypsy]

It was actually a retraction of the whole f*cking C&P report.

I have an idea that when she said everything that she previously labeled as pre-existing (contrary to regs, just talking out her ass with no facts) were known and accepted symptoms of solvent poisoning that pretty much resolved the case. That combined with my pointing out the documented diagnosis that everyone who claimed to review the claims file missed, in service of solvent poisoning, pretty much clears everything up. The Navy doc didn't label it solvent poisoning, he  just said I was real sick for a 21 day period from paint fumes. Morons review C-files for the VA.

And to really clean it up she acknowledged in writing in the addendum that she was a peripheral nerve specialist and was not qualified to render any of the opinions in the C&P that she did render. I'm running like hell to get ready for a trip to the US, which just might coincidentally include all the remaining exams ordered by the BVA. I'm in the process of packing and restoring 3 computers. But if you enjoy subtlety you will love her sparsely worded addendum, one largely empty page. I didn't get everything I wanted but like Mick Jagger says, if you try some time, you just might find that you get, you get, what you need.

From my perspective of 35 years in practice dealing with medical issues, the addendum was written by a typically incompetent VA,  wet behind the ears lawyer child (after being told a retraction was necessary)that believes the practice of law is all about weaselly, mealy mouthed word games. He thought he was being slick but the ignorant fool just solved all statute of limitations problems and opened her wide to fresh claims of intentional torts.

I may not get it posted before I go, but it will be posted soon. This computer just had the hard drive replaced and was sitting for 2.5 years. My other two are being reformatted but I have backups. it's sweet.

[blahsaysme2u]