Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Supplement Claim and LHI exam

Rate this question


Ken Dillon

Question

VA seems to have lost my NOD on my Cervical Spine, so I put in Supplement claim. As of two days ago I am schedule for another exam by LHI this week, its states for Cervical neck and a new IMO that I submitted, so my question is why would they state in heading new IMO. This makes 3 IMO I have submitted, one from family doctor and one from the surgeon that performed the fusion, any ideas? or am I looking to deep in to this?

Just one more question for you, on my last exam performed by VES on my Cervical Spine I have copy of exam but the Heading States Medical opinion disability benefits questionnaire , when I look online there is a Cervical questionnaire that has range of motion.The one I have does not just his opinion.

 

Thank You

Ken

Link to comment
  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator
6 hours ago, Ken Dillon said:

VA seems to have lost my NOD on my Cervical Spine, so I put in Supplement claim. As of two days ago I am schedule for another exam by LHI this week, its states for Cervical neck and a new IMO that I submitted, so my question is why would they state in heading new IMO. This makes 3 IMO I have submitted, one from family doctor and one from the surgeon that performed the fusion, any ideas? or am I looking to deep in to this?

Just one more question for you, on my last exam performed by VES on my Cervical Spine I have copy of exam but the Heading States Medical opinion disability benefits questionnaire , when I look online there is a Cervical questionnaire that has range of motion.The one I have does not just his opinion.

Who really knows why VA does what they do? It is just a part of their games. One of my last LHI C & P exam was for my claim for sleep apnea. After discussing it with my VAMC Rheumatologist, I filed a claim for sleep apnea secondary to my service-connected fibromyalgia, my doctor wrote my IMO, the VA then scheduled me and sent me to a LHI C & P exam. When I went there, I played dumb and asked the examiner why I was there and she told me the VA wanted her opinion if my sleep apnea was secondary to my service-connected fibromyalgia and I told her that I just had an IMO from my treating VAMC doctor, and I did not know why the VA would need her opinion. I then gave her a copy of it and after she read through it, she said that she did not know why the VA made the appointment. She then wrote a statement that my sleep apnea was definitely secondary to my service-connected fibromyalgia and that I already had a positive IMO and that she agreed with my treating doctor’s opinion and when my claim was returned to the VA, they granted it within thirty (30) days. No argument, no fight and I was ready to go to the BVA, but I did not have to.

Some doctors do not like going against other doctor’s opinions. Not saying that this is your case, but it never hurts. What most veterans don’t understand that once a veteran has a positive IMO in their records, even if they get a negative IMO, the veteran still wins. The veteran may have to file an appeal, but the veteran still wins.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
  • 0

VA has to have specific info on Cervical spine disabilities to rate it. If the IMO and Surgeons statements you submitted did not contain all of the info they list on DBQ's, they will request the C&P to get those answers. Alternatively, if the info you submitted contained everything that is requested in the DBQ, the C&P would be unnecessary. IF the VA has acceptable clinical evidence sufficient to rate the issue, they should not request the C&P. Look at the new evidence you provided and compare that with the DBQ for cervical spines and you should be able to answer this question.

 

The IG dinged the VBA for unnecessary C&P exams in 2018. If you suspect that the exam was duplicative and not needed, consider filing an IG report on this. VA needs to follow the rules, and reporting this type of issue would go a long way to get them to wise up and train their RO's to insure that C&P exams are actually necessary. 

Edited by pwrslm
Link to comment


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use