Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

VBMS vs. Ebenefits is their a timeline when ebenefits is updated?

Rate this question


JKWilliamsSr

Question

I have a rather interesting situation maybe someone can shed a little insight on.    To be honest it seems baffling to me.   Monday my attorney told me that according to VBMS I am at 100% with an effective date of 2019.   I believe this happened sometime last week.   What prompted the email is according to my attorney the VA sent him a letter because they have a problem with our contigency agreement.  I went back and read the agreement.  It is a pretty straight forward agreement.  No tricky sentences getting me to agree to anything out of the ordinary.   The agreement is for 20% of backpay received.   I am very grateful for my attorney.  He took me from 50% to 80% to 100% and has earned every cent.  I have been fighting the uphill battle since 2009 and am not close to the finish line. 

I am probably making an assumption but my guess is the VA does not plan on paying my attorney from the backpay. I have no idea what the issue is with the agreement.  My attorney did say I should be getting a letter in the mail from the VA about this and I should see a deposit from the VA any day now.    He did say it would be easier to invoice me after my deposit for the 20% and I am perfectly fine with that.  My entire expectation was 20% of all backpay and I knew this going in.   What is confusing to me is why does the VA have an issue now?  When I went from 50% to 80% the paid my attorney directly.  Why not now?

But I digress....here is my question.

VBMS shows a rating with an effective date.  What could be holding up the update on ebenefits?   Would the fact that this was based off an appeal from the BVA? My guess is someone is looking at the issue of backpay because a decision was made on attorney fees.  Yet as I type this there is no update on Ebenefits and my appeal is closed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Benefits is not VBMS, Its set to close completely in March last I knew, which was a month ago that I checked. Take little that you see of it to be up to date. Pretty much everything has moved to VA.gov. 

 

As for the rest, that's not a function that VSRs or raters do. That's part of fiduciary, so without seeing the letter who knows? Right now you just have a generalization off what he said the letter said. Here is the most current on fee agreements

 

https://www.knowva.ebenefits.va.gov/system/templates/selfservice/va_ssnew/help/customer/locale/en-US/portal/554400000001018/content/554400000181477/M21-1,-Part-I,-Subpart-i,-Chapter-2,-Section-C---Introduction-to-Attorney-Fees

 

 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

ebenefits/va.gov have a "notorious reputation" for being not up to date, in accurate, incomplete, or just plain wrong.  

Im not sure this will be fixed any time soon.  However, "one part" of ebennies is normally accurate:

"The letters section".  

The VA does not like Veterans running around with a letter that says they are 100 percent P and T, "Unless" that is, in fact, true.  

Dont count on the effective date for ebenefits.  

We really dont know the issue with the fee agreement, or some glitch between the fee, your attorney, yourself and VA.  It sounds like you are doing the right thing.  

When/if the retro arrives, and is safely in your bank, you can "write the attorney a check" for retro on the disability issues agreed to by you and the attorney.  

On occassion, an attorney may well agree to represent you on "issue" (_________), ONLY, and not represent you on other issues.  This has happened to me.  

Example:  You have an appeal going on for back pain.  Later, you also apply for PTSD to the VARO, which has not even been adjuticated yet.  

Attorney's must have "a denial letter" before they can represent you.  So, the attorney may not be representing you with PTSD, you applied for that while your other issues were in a long appeal line.  Its possible, in that long wait, your PTSD could be awarded.  In this example, you would not owe the attorney 20 percent of your PTSD award, only on the issues which he was appealing for you.  

    So, when you write the attorney a check, you can//should parse out, any issues he was not involved with, and you should be able to keep 100 percent of THAT portion.  

   Importantly, it may be possible or even likely that some part of your attorney fees have been paid by EAJA.  This is especially true if you had a remand from CAVC, and you eventually win benefits based on that remand.  

    The attorney is not allowed to "double dip", and collect money from you and also eaja on the same benefits.  

    Example:  I got a remand at CAVC.  My attorney applied for, and got paid, $6000 from EAJA, at no cost to me.  

    Upon remand, the board awarded benefits.  The attorney had to deduct the $6000 already paid by eaja from his fee, and I wound up paying just $1000.  But I would have owed the attorney $7000, but he already got 6000 from eaja.  

    Another attorney represented me "exclusively" at the CAVC, and "NOT" before the Board.  (I know why he does this, a cavc decision can be complete in six months, while board decisions sometimes take years and years, or even decades, and he does not exactly like waiting for decades for his payment.  You may not want to work today, and then maybe get paid 10 years later, either.). For this reason my attorney chose to "not" represent Veterans at the BOARD, but instead limited his representation "TO THE CAVC/FEDERAL CIRCUIT' only.  It was great, as I eventually won at the board, after cavc remand and following my attorneys advice and getting an IMO, so I paid zero attorney fees, and eaja paid them all.  

    Bottom line, when you get your retro, if there was no deduction taken for attorney fees, then discuss your issues in detail, and work out a payment that suits you and him, consistent with your fee agreement.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Ebenefits is not going to be fixed. It is going away. Completely. Last date I heard for sunset was March 22nd. Everything is supposed to be at VA.gov and the only few remaining things at Ebenefits that DO work are only because some veterans have their claims still proceeding that were originally filed under Ebenefits and it hasn't been moved yet. 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

is the list of disabilities and your rating going to move? or do you know. i like having that list. be nice if the EED date for P&T could/would be added if you can take suggestions 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

The whole page is going away. It's all moving in some form or another. 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
5 minutes ago, brokensoldier244th said:

The whole page is going away. It's all moving in some form or another. 

no i get that...just hoping they dont get rid of it like they did documents section of bennies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • LEArmy93P earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • LtDave earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • HillTopVet earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva went up a rank
      Contributor
    • AFguy1999 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use