Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Just starting Disability claim from first denial response

Rate this question


BadWolfe

Question

I am new here and new to both requesting a disability rating as well as receiving a denial letter from the VA.  Any help and advice is needed and appreciated.  The VA letter agreed that the issues with my back were documented during my service (Army 1978-1981) and that I can now show severe damage to two locations of my spine.  I've had no injuries or accidents since leaving the Military and employment was office related type work.  The reason stated for denial was that the examining Physician "opined" that he did not see evidence of "continuity" of injury.  In other words, I don't have documentation of my visits to Chiropractors, Physical Therapists, Massage Therapists, Physicians starting in 1981, after discharge, although I did all of those and more (tried acupuncture at one point). 

Any advice on how I should proceed?  I've already tried to reach back through insurance company records, but those companies tell me they can only go back as far as 2011, so that is not my solution for proof.  Also, I did not have consistent a consistent Doctor or service providers during those years to have any records provided from them.

Training during the timeframe of 1978 through 1981 was not the most ergonomic.  Is there any source documentation concerning the changes of toward more ergonomic Military equipment? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

BadWolf Welcome to Hadit. Two things: first, most important; you need a nexus letter from a doc or med specialist that you have a current back condition disability, which is a diagnosis, and then , need a nexus or connection that what happened in the service is the cause of your current disability. The second thing, to address continuity, besides your doctor's nexus, is to submit buddy letters from someone that can attest that after your accident you no longer could do those "athletic" things that you could before the service connected incident. If you have been prescribed meds for you back, that would help in the continuity battle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
3 hours ago, Whodat said:

Welcome,

Do you have or can you retrieve your denial letter from back then. It may help. 

I do have it.  Here is the relevant part of the denial:

Service connection for lumbosacral strain with degenerative disc disease of the

thoracolumbar spine (claimed as back condition).

Service connection may be granted for a disability which began in military service or was caused

by some event or experience in service. Service connection for lumbosacral strain with

degenerative disc disease of the thoracolumbar spine is denied since this condition neither

occurred in nor was caused by service. Separation examination dated March 1981 sirowed you

reported a history of recurrent back pain. While your seruice treatment records retlect

complaints, treatment, or a diagnosis similar to that clairned, the medical evidence supports the

conclusion that a persistent disability was not present in service. 'Ihere was no continuity of

symptoms from service to the present. We did not find a link between your medical condition

and military service. The examirrer opined your current conditicln was less likely than not related

to the back.pain reported at the time of separation in 1981. (38 CIIR 3.303, 38 CFR 3.304)

Favorable Findings identified in this decision:

The evidence shows that a qualifuing event, rnjrry, or disease had its onset during your service.

Separation examination dated March 1981 showed you reported a history of recurrent back pain.

You have been diagnosed with a disability. Back examination from QTC dated January 27,2A22,

thg*t a diagnosis of lumbosacral strain with degenerative disc disease of the thoracolumbar

spme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
2 hours ago, GBArmy said:

BadWolf Welcome to Hadit. Two things: first, most important; you need a nexus letter from a doc or med specialist that you have a current back condition disability, which is a diagnosis, and then , need a nexus or connection that what happened in the service is the cause of your current disability. The second thing, to address continuity, besides your doctor's nexus, is to submit buddy letters from someone that can attest that after your accident you no longer could do those "athletic" things that you could before the service connected incident. If you have been prescribed meds for you back, that would help in the continuity battle. 

Thank you for this.  I do have that just in my wife alone.  I met her as soon as I was discharged, so she can attest to it as well as the decline.  There is no question it was identified while still in service and the two severe locations now.  With no accidents or injuries after my service, anyone can tell it was a progression.  It didn't just show up today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Refer to my response. You need a nexus that your current disability is connected you your service connected injury. And, you have to answer the continuity question. Ex. I self medicated, etc. took acupuncture, yoga, PT, etc. , etc. Here are the doctor/treatment bills, .... You have some of the evidence you need, get the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use