Grove v Nicholson

[Mr cue]

Ok this is a court percendent an It might help other get the VA to follow remand instructions.

This part of my argument about the veterans affairs remove issues from my cavc remand docket.

An treating them as new appeal not Cavc remand.

 

 

Grove v Nicholson

The Board is required to substantially comply with its own prior remand orders, and with prior remand orders issued by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Stegall v. West 11 Vet.App. 268 (1998)la
. “Rather, a party can be found in civil contempt where his failure to fully comply with a Court
Rule or order is the result of ‘gross negligence and a gross lack of diligence.’” Id. (quoting Pousson,
22 Vet.App. at 437
N addition, to ensure compliance with future remands, the Court will instruct the Clerk to Send copies of this order to multiple VA officials as identified below for immediate, appropriate

Action for setting in place safeguards to prevent or catch any misclassification of this Court’s orders

In VACOLS, to ensure that cases remanded from this Court are on the appropriate remand track, and

To ensure that correspondence is reviewed upon receipt and afforded appropriate scrutiny to

Determine whether the case identified in the correspondence is a case on remand from this Court,
That is, acknowledged and treated by VA as one on remand from this Court and is on an appropriate
 

 

[63Charlie]

Thanks.

Might be just what I need in the near future.

I hope not but I put nothing past the appeals process.