Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

VA Claims reviewers deferring claims involving IMO support??? Anyone see a pattern?

Rate this topic


Corwin

Recommended Posts

I am not saying anyone lies, but I don't believe they read the records... or they lie either way... in my case I have more than enough,, I know this looks liek I am being flppant about my records, but without stating again all the issues, llok at some of my medical records with the va... (I say some because, yes there are some more) photo of records attached (for those that don't know me.. sorry if you have already seen them)

 

01-01-11_My_Medical_Records.jpg

Edited by retiredat44
duoble post

Not in appeals, since I got 100%, and some of it was winning an 1151 negligence, which the VA turns out does not give ful benefits if you win 1151 negligence they squirm and legal loophhole you and your family out of many benefits, really crapp nasty bunch running the va benefits, they wil backstab and scre wyou even if you win you lose. May 2021.

01-01-11_My_Medical_Records2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I understand why the person who posted is feeling some type of way.

First it sound like he put in a hlr for his effective date. Not an increase rating 

So I feel him.

Next they call a duty to assist error or a inadequate exam error on something that was already granted.

Ok does any of this have to do with a effective date. No.

I don't think there is anything the veteran can do right now but go through there process.

Now to if they try to reduce.

Yes he has to appeal the decision

An go through the process of fighting the reduction. Yes I think that would be more stressful.

Now I can't say what they are doing but there is nothing wrong with gathering info if they try to reduce 

Last the VA is working different than it did it 20 10 years ago.

I have seen the games

I apply for my smc benfits after my 25 years just because of things like this.

An I have over 4 request to reduce my rating in my record since 2018 when I apply for smc benfits.

All came back 25 yr protected.

So I am not one to just say the VA will not do this or that 

An yes you will win if they didn't do the reduction right.

Who want to fight for there rating when all they ask was for there effective date to be address.

Last I would upload a statement that you put in the hlr about your effective date not a increase rating.

Explain everything. It become part of your record. So if you do have to appeal.

Good luck

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, retiredat44 said:

I am not saying anyone lies, but I don't believe they read the records... or they lie either way... in my case I have more than enough,, I know this looks liek I am being flppant about my records, but without stating again all the issues, llok at some of my medical records with the va... (I say some because, yes there are some more) photo of records attached (for those that don't know me.. sorry if you have already seen them)

 

01-01-11_My_Medical_Records.jpg

I always like the picture.  Puts some things into perspective.  Keep posting it.  The VA should show it to all the new "raters" and then explain "duty to assist" to them as well.  LOL,

Carl

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get an IMO. Lol. That's what I have been reading here on Hadit. Strong IMO wins claims without a lawyer or remands. Lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 7/20/2022 at 3:11 PM, Whodat said:

Get an IMO. Lol. That's what I have been reading here on Hadit. Strong IMO wins claims without a lawyer or remands. Lol. 

not so much, they will fight your imo with one of their imo mills on retainer. They did with mine. It was a pure b.s one, they had the credentials but the imo was cookie cutter. So, they will not give up they will fight you to your death. I am not being sarcastic, I am telling you the truth of my experience plus what I learned over decades of their abuse.

Not in appeals, since I got 100%, and some of it was winning an 1151 negligence, which the VA turns out does not give ful benefits if you win 1151 negligence they squirm and legal loophhole you and your family out of many benefits, really crapp nasty bunch running the va benefits, they wil backstab and scre wyou even if you win you lose. May 2021.

01-01-11_My_Medical_Records2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok we all understand that the VA is going to address what it want.

They will order as many exam as they feel until they find the one they need to denied.

Now will the bva address this no they might remand an give them the chance to order more exams.

Now when you get to the court the court is were you address it all.

The VA must give a reason and base for not accept favorable evidence.

They must address favorable and unfavorable medical evidence.

This is how the benfit of doubt comes in to play. 

 

 

But this isn't how it work anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use