Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Can a DROC overturn a BVA decision?

Rate this question


63Charlie

Question

 

The Board decided my tinnitis claim is rated at 10%, effective date April, 2016.

 

The Board decided my Meniere's Disease is rated at 30%, effective date July, 2018.

 

Based on what I understand, after these favorable Board decisions, along comes a DROC under Section 1., "Reasons For Decision", and invalidates the Board's 10% tinnitus rating stating it is "stopped", and that my separate tinnitis rating is now combined with my Meniere's Disease 30% rating, effective July, 2018.

 

I'm attaching files for peer review and opinions.

 

Scan_0139.jpg

Scan_0140.jpg

Scan_0141.jpg

Scan_0142.jpg

Edited by 63Charlie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Also, what is an "at once exam" to determine my level of disability?

Should I believe in Unicorns and other magical creatures to go along with the DRO statement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

38cfr4.87 says under 6260 that tinnitus can be a symptom of another ear disability, i.e. meneire's disease. I think you must look at the cfr when your decisions were made and see if there is a change now. You may have a case but I would expect you will need a lawyer for arguing the effective date. Tinnitus was one of the 3 disabilities that the VA asked for input on a change to the code in February. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Another approach is pyramiding. Yes, they granted you SC for both, but under pyramiding they would only compensate you based on the higher rating percentage of the two. I ran into the same garbage when the board granted me SC for both sinusitis and chronic allergic rhinitis. Instead of getting both as separate ratings, they merged them and granted the higher of the two per the stupid pyramiding rule.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Maybe its me who "missed" something here.  This says you have been 100 percent since 2015, and continue the same.  "Other than" SMC, you can not be rated over 100 percent.  So, this would appear to be moot.  

However, you did not post the Regional office rating disability combined percentages, so maybe this is the part which is incorrect.  

Of course, its true that the VARO can not "over rule" BVA decisions, and must abide with them.  But, what I dont see is any difference in your combined ratings, this is likely because you did not post those VARO combined percentages.  

Im a big believer in "case or controversy".  100 percent = 100 percent.  Exceptions:

1.  If it would affect your SMC, such as make you eligible for "100 plus 60" combined SMC.  

2.  Sometimes it could make a difference in DIC for your family.  This would mean you would be likely to die from Meniere's disease or tinnitus.  According to "family doctor" which I checked online, Meniere's disease is not fatal.  

3.  Effective date(s).  

Thus, if it does not affect your overall compensation or DIC, I would simply ignore this error.  

"If" however, it could mean extra bucks for you or your family, then I would certainly appeal, citing your arguments you described.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I have a different opinion. While you are rated 100% as was stated by someone else,  the decision will not add or reduce any compensation but.... what about the future? Look I started with a 30% rating in 1986 and now regardless of compensation, I have one combined 100% rating, a TDIU rating and a 100% rating for a single issue. In my case, along the way I picked up some SMC's.  Reading your letter. I did not know what DROC meant so I looked it up  : M21-5, Chapter 3, Section A, Decision Review Operations Center (DROC) Quality Review Team (QRT)

Apparently the award was reviewed by a team of "specialist" and they decided you could not have two awards. But this is a change in the rating guidelines that recently happend, its not special to your case. The VA has decided not to award Tinnius speerately , using the reasoning that tinnius is caused by hearing problems and is not an actual stand alone disease. They proposed to give veterans with a 0% hearing loss and tinnitis a combined 10% rating. This is in the new rating guidelines.There is more to the new guidelines than this alone, but I cannot remember them all right now.   I am not well versed on meniers disease, other than its a disease of the innner ear, so to me, based on the new rating guidelines this is a valid rating. 

Fiinally, getting back to my first pargraph, that 30% rating may not mean much now, but in the future the rating could increase, and/or you might aquire other ratings, that would net SMC's. I have always advocated going for every service connected rating you can get. In my case it has paid off well.  

                                                                                I am not a lawyer so take my opinions with a grain of salt...

If I had listened to the nay sayers, I would never have acheived any ratings after I was awarded TDIU in 1999. Now I have not one but two 100% ratings, a TDIU  and 4 SMC awards !  I say JUST GO For It

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” -Albert Einstein.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • LEArmy93P earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • LtDave earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • HillTopVet earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva went up a rank
      Contributor
    • AFguy1999 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use