Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bva Case Psychiatric Records Destroyed After 5 Years

Rate this question


Josephine

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hi,

I read this on one of the BVA cases. This is something that I didn't know. What do you all know about it?

http://www.va.gov/vetapp06/files3/0619822.txt

Citation Nr: 0619822

Decision Date: 07/07/06 Archive Date: 07/13/06

DOCKET NO. 05-35 363 ) DATE

)

)

On appeal from the

Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in St.

Petersburg, Florida

However, the SMRs do not include mental health records, such as psychological

evaluations and other mental health consultations.

Such records are normally retained by the facility that created the record for 5 years before the records are destroyed.

While the mental health records concerning the veteran may have been destroyed, a request to obtain these records must be made.

Is this why the VA was so shocked that my " Psychiatric Consultations" were at the NARA, and I acquired them some 42 years later.

Josephine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Josephine:

I am glad that you found your records. I really don't see how the VA has any business destroying Veterans records for any reason.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I just can't figure this one. I can see why so many claims for PTSD can not be proven. What a shame.

I had no ideal of what my military treating doctor was talking about, on the telephone , when I spoke to him about protecting my records, when I read this case, the light began to shine. He sent them in for me.

He was my guadian angel in more ways than one. Dr. C saved my life in service, protected my records and came to my aid with a letter of explantion of his treatment of me to the BVA. Of course, I did baby-sit for him and his wife and I mailed him all of his service medical records and the psychiatric consultations by the review board to whom he sent me to.

I was happy at the time of his letter to the BVA, he was still practicing as CEO, but he is retired now. He and his wife are cruising around the world. He told the BVA, if they needed anything now to let him know, for he would be hard to find. As it turns out, he has decided to teach at Harvard Medical School.

He has told me not to drop this claim and that he will see me through it. Not many of his kind around.

Always,

Josephine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is an unusual BVA case.

the veteran served only 80 days.

"He contends that he currently suffers from

depression based on events that occurred during his period of

service and as a result of his discharge"

There must be more to this than what appears-I would think his character of discharge was questioned but dont see that or even why he was discharged- in the BVA case-

This is on a remand and the BVA is giving this vet every opportunity to support his claim-

It bothers me though that the vet did have some strong medical statements:

"The veteran has submitted several letters from F. G. Stanley,

Ph.D., in support of his claim. Dr. Stanley has said he

first treated the veteran in October 2001. Dr. Stanley's

treatment records are not associated with the claims file and

should be requested on remand.

The several statements from Dr. Stanley related the veteran's

depression to his military service. He referred to service

personnel records in the claims file as support for his

opinion that the veteran's depression was related to service."

Yet the VA wanted another opinion- a VA opinion of course-

"In light of Dr. Stanley's several letters relating the

veteran's depression to service, a medical examination is

required." See 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103A(d) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R.

§ 3.159©(4) (2005).

If the vets SMRs from Basic training cannot be found-I sure hope the vet took all the time this sat at the BVA to strength and prove his stressor or whatever event caused the depression.

Even if he gets a lousy VA opinion against the claim- those treatment records of Dr. Stanley can put the claim into realm of Benefit of Doubt-thus an award- BUT

not without confirmation of the nexus- the actual stressor-

it must have been very serious to curtail his military service -after only 80 days.and it was not a medical discharge. ???

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Why is the duty station destroying psychiatric records after keeping them for 5 years at the duty station. The BVA speaks as this is common practice to do this. Why aren't the psychiatric records placed in the veterans claims file at the archives? This guy will never locate those records. If it took me 40 years to acquire mine after the VA denying them being there. Something doesn't add up!

For claims of anxiety or depression, the veteran does not have to prove a stressor, only PTSD. I imagine, this is why he changed his claim from PTSD to Depression.

I was told over and over by the VA that I didn't have any psychiatric records, but when I hand wrote a letter to the archives of what I specifically wanted, the technician located them for me.

This is not right.

Josephine

Edited by Josephine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The BVA case really is pretty vague in it's wording.

So, I thought about this for a minute..........let's see what you think about my reasoning?

This veteran's period of service was before "Don't Ask...etc.." wasn't it?

Had a guy in my basic training platoon........it was pretty rough on him...the way they treated him after figuring out his "alternate sexuality preferences". Last time I saw him, he was running down the company area shouting "I'm gonna kill that *&&^%^".

Last I ever saw of him was when they loaded him up in that grey Navy ambulance.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use