Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

CUE in very favorable decision, Mtn for Reconsideration, How much Delay???

Rate this question


Otrgypsy

Question

I just received a very favorable decision (after almost 10 years) that service connected my brain damage, acquired psych disabilities, sleep apnea and insomnia, GI disabilities and neuropathies, all due to solvent exposure.  HOWEVER,  they didn't say ONE word about my chronic fatigue syndrome, which has always been an issue on appeal. I notified them the next day of thier omission. I believe it was a typical (for the VA) oversight. CFS was originally denied on basis which have now been found in my favor.

Today, I read the fine print re: Motions for Reconsideration. It seems I must file one more formally. I will probably get a 100% scheduled rating on the decision as it issued, if it is done by a competent rater. That is a big if. I will clearly get 100% when Individual unemployability is considered, but because of the way one political party keeps trying to shave off benefits for the benefit of tax dodging billionaires, I would really rather have 100% scheduled, which would be guaranteed with CFS being awarded.

MY BIG QUESTION IS: Will the Regional Office go ahead and do an initial rating and payment on the Decision that issued and see if they need to revise it later, OR will the Motion for Reconsideration further delay initial payments ???

Edited by Otrgypsy
typo, additional facts, typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator
On 4/26/2023 at 8:03 AM, broncovet said:

The "appeal period clock" does not stop during the reconsideration period.  In other words, while you are waiting for the reconsideration, the 120 day appeal period can, and often does, expire.  This means you mess around with an MFR, and then miss the appeal deadline.  Berry law would seem to agree with me:

https://ptsdlawyers.com/motion-for-reconsideration-in-va-disability-appeals/

Actually, if you read through the site/cite you posted, if the BVA accepts the veteran's (MFR) Motion for Reconsideration, the 120 days’ timeframe is put on hold or placed in limbo until the board makes a decision on if they would accept the veteran's MFR. This does not mean that just because the board accepts the MFR that the BVA would grant the veteran's reconsideration and or appeal. It just means that the BVA has accepted the MFR, and it has to be reviewed before the BVA makes a new decision.  

Quote

How does a Motion for Reconsideration Work?

A motion for reconsideration request can be filed after a Board decision has been made. There are time constraints on when these can be filed. Normally, you would have 120 days to file an appeal of a Board decision in order to get the CAVC to hear your case. If you file an MFR after a Board decision, the 120 days are “tolled,” meaning that until the Board determines whether it wants to grant the MFR or not, your 120-day time limit on filing an appeal with the CAVC is kind of “held in limbo” until the Board makes a decision. Once the Board makes a decision, you then have the 120-day clock start running. Please note: the 120-day clock starts running when the Board sends you notice of a decision, not necessarily when you actually receive your notification.

 

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use