Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Scrapnel Wounds

Rate this question


Berta

Question

This is bizarre-

email from Colonel Dan--

what VA stated is just ridiculous.I could see if maybe they are just scarring surface wounds and not ratable-

but the statement VA made is ludicrous-the wounds "aren't related to your military service.

Champaign veteran fighting disability battle with VA

http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/200...eteran_fighting

_disability_battle_with_va

Thursday March 22, 2007

CHAMPAIGN, IL - According to Army doctors, Garrett Anderson has "shrapnel

wounds, all over body."

But the Champaign man found out last week from the Department of Veterans

Affairs that the wounds "aren't related to your military service."

"I must have got them on North Prospect," Anderson jokes.

It was no joke on Oct. 15, 2005, when an improvised explosive device tore

through his body in Iraq, injuring his face and destroying his lower right

arm.

The VA sent him a letter dated March 5 saying that the 30-year-old is 90

percent disabled, following a complicated formula that gives him 70 percent

automatically for his arm.

Anderson would like the full 100 percent, not just because that means more

money - about $1,000 more, according to their figures - but because 100

percent guarantees educational expenses for himself, his wife, Sam, and his

children.

Sam is just finishing law school in Michigan and has enormous college loans.

"We have the (debt) number somewhere, but we don't like to look at it," she

said.

Her husband plans to go back to college himself, perhaps to study criminal

justice. He is also considering a career in politics, as a crusader for

veterans rights.

As a National Guard soldier earning hazard pay in Iraq, Anderson earned

$3,000 a month. His disability pay will be about $1,800 a month.

Carl Henderson, a spokesman for the Veterans Benefits Administration Chicago

regional office, said he can't discuss the specifics of Anderson's case for

health privacy reasons.

He acknowledged that explaining the percentage scale is not easy.

"It's a complex process based on ratings schedule and special reviews. The

disability percentage or compensation is based on service-connected injuries

- they do not have to be combat-related," Henderson said. "Veterans

disability compensation could be combined on several injuries or wounds that

are service connected."

He was puzzled by the description of shrapnel wounds as not service-related.

"I have no idea why shrapnel wounds would not be service connected if he was

in the military. Maybe he incurred the injury when he wasn't in the

military?"

The good news, Henderson said, is "the appeals process is always open.

Unlike other types of appeals, they can always be reopened."

The Andersons do intend to appeal the ruling, and they've been told that

process could take two years. There's a level of uncertainty about whether

to proceed with college immediately.

Anderson said he's a little angry about the 90 percent rating.

"I feel that (the VA's) just trying to save money," he said.

He's also not pleased that he needs to have another VA physician examine him

when he's recently undergone the long process.

And he's concerned about documenting his military medical history, which

starts in a fog in a field hospital and continued at the trouble-plagued

Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington.

"He's not even sure where the amputation took place," Sam said.

Garrett and Sam still have a sense of humor to fall back on.

"We're going to put you to work," they tell their infant daughter, Skyler.

_____

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use