Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

DSM-IV and DSM-5 in Terms of PTSD and Its Effects on VA Disability Ratings


Recommended Posts

  • Founder

dsm5-001.pngEffective August 4, 2014, the amendment to 38 CFR 4.125 states that a mental disorder diagnosis must conform to the standards set in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Before that date, the regulation required diagnoses to conform to the DSM-IV.

Introduction

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has undergone significant changes in its diagnostic criteria with the transition from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) to the Fifth Edition (DSM-5). These changes have profound implications for veterans seeking disability ratings from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). This article explores the critical differences between DSM-IV and DSM-5 in diagnosing PTSD, the rationale behind these changes, and their impact on VA disability ratings.

Evolution of PTSD Diagnostic Criteria

DSM-IV Criteria

Under DSM-IV, the classification of PTSD was under Anxiety Disorders, and the following criteria were required for diagnosis.

- Criterion A: Exposure to a traumatic event involving actual or threatened death, serious injury, or a threat to physical integrity, with a response involving intense fear, helplessness, or horror.

- Criterion B: Persistent re-experiencing of the traumatic event (e.g., flashbacks, nightmares).

- Criterion C: Persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the Trauma and numbing of general responsiveness.

- Criterion D: Persistent symptoms of increased arousal (e.g., hypervigilance, exaggerated startle response).

- Criterion E: The duration of symptoms is more than one month.

- Criterion F: Significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

DSM-5 Criteria

The DSM-5 introduced several fundamental changes:

Reclassification moved PTSD from Anxiety Disorders to a new category called Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders 2 5.

- Criterion A: Expanded to include direct exposure, witnessing, learning about Trauma to a close relative or friend, and repeated or extreme exposure to aversive details of the traumatic event (e.g., first responders) 5.

- Criterion B: Re-experiencing symptoms remained similar but with refined descriptions.

- Criterion C: Avoidance symptoms were separated from numbing symptoms, now categorized under Criterion D.

- Criterion D: New category for negative alterations in cognitions and mood, including symptoms like persistent negative beliefs and feelings of detachment 1 7.

- Criterion E: Alterations in arousal and reactivity, including irritability, reckless behavior, and sleep disturbances.

- Criterion F: The duration of symptoms is more than one month.

- Criterion G: Significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

- Criterion H: Symptoms not attributable to substance use or other medical conditions.

Rationale for Changes

The changes from DSM-IV to DSM-5 were driven by extensive research and clinical input aimed at improving diagnostic accuracy and reflecting a better understanding of PTSD. The reclassification into Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders acknowledges PTSD arises specifically from exposure to traumatic events, differentiating it from other anxiety disorders 1 5.

Impact on VA Disability Ratings

Diagnostic Criteria

The VA adopted DSM-5 criteria in August 2014, so they evaluate all PTSD disability claims received or pending review on or after this date using the new criteria 2.

This transition has several implications:

- Symptom Clusters: The separation of avoidance and numbing symptoms into distinct clusters (Criteria C and D) allows for more precise identification and documentation of PTSD symptoms 7.

- Expanded Criterion A: The broadened definition of traumatic exposure under Criterion A may lead to more veterans qualifying for a PTSD diagnosis, as it includes indirect exposure to trauma 9.

- Negative Cognitions and Mood: The inclusion of negative alterations in cognitions and mood (Criterion D) provides a more comprehensive understanding of the psychological impact of Trauma, potentially leading to higher disability ratings for veterans with severe symptoms. 1 5.

Evaluation and Rating

The VA rates PTSD on a scale from 0% to 100% based on the severity of symptoms and their impact on daily life, work efficiency, and social functioning 3.

The DSM-5 criteria influence this rating process in several ways:

- Detailed Symptom Documentation: The refined criteria require more detailed documentation of symptoms, which can aid in accurately assessing the severity of PTSD and determining the appropriate disability rating 6.

- Consistency in Evaluation: The standardized criteria help ensure consistency in evaluations across different VA examiners and facilities, potentially reducing variability in disability ratings 6.

- Potential for Higher Ratings: The new symptom clusters and expanded definitions may lead to higher ratings for veterans with complex PTSD presentations, as the criteria capture a broader range of symptoms and their effects 5.

Challenges and Considerations

While the DSM-5 criteria offer several advantages, there are also challenges and considerations for veterans and clinicians:

- Transition Period: The transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5 may have led to initial evaluation inconsistencies as clinicians adapted to the new criteria 5.

- Documentation Requirements: The detailed documentation required by DSM-5 can be time-consuming for clinicians and may require additional training and resources 6.

- Impact on Prevalence: Some studies suggest that the prevalence of PTSD diagnoses may decrease slightly under DSM-5 because of the more stringent criteria, mainly the exclusion of sudden unexpected death of a loved one from Criterion A 9.

Conclusion

The transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5 brought significant changes to the diagnostic criteria for PTSD, reflecting advancements in our understanding of the disorder. These changes have important implications for veterans seeking VA disability ratings. The reclassification of PTSD expanded definitions of traumatic exposure and refined symptom clusters provide a more comprehensive framework for diagnosing and evaluating PTSD. While the new criteria offer several benefits, including more detailed documentation and consistency in evaluations, they also present challenges regarding adaptation and documentation requirements. Overall, the DSM-5 criteria for PTSD are a step forward in accurately diagnosing and assessing the impact of Trauma on veterans. By understanding these changes and their implications, veterans and clinicians can better navigate the VA disability rating process and ensure that veterans receive the support and compensation they deserve.

Related Articles

Sources:

-      (1) Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in the DSM-5: Controversy, Change ...

-      (2) Understanding Your PTSD Rating (Update 2023)

-      (3) Guide To PTSD VA Rating | Veteran Disability Benefit Lawyer

-      (4) [PDF] Finalizing PTSD in DSM-5: Getting Here From There and Where to ...

-      (5) Big Changes Coming: DSM-5 Criteria for PTSD - Veterans Help Group - (6) [PDF] Impact of Evidence-Based Standardized Assessment on the ...

-      (7) DSM-5 Criteria for PTSD - Brainline.org

-      (8) [PDF] Highlights of Changes from DSM-IV-TR to DSM-5

-      (9) PTSD and DSM-5 - PTSD: National Center for PTSD - VA.gov

-      (10) [PDF] Examining the diagnostic utility of the DSM-5 PTSD symptoms ...


View full record

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use