Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Veteran Needs Your Help !

Rate this question


rthomass

Question

I need help from any Veteran that served in Thailand during the Vietnam Era; Specifically Nakon Phanom RTAFB "NKP" Air Force Base, "naked Fanny" during the peiod of August 1969 to August 1970. Need Corroboration of Agent Orange use to support claim remanded by the CAVC to the Board Of Veteran Appeals "BVA".

Randall D. Thomas Sr.

rthomass@insightbb.com

Edited by rthomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I couldnt use the links because my PM is off but I did find it all under a search and read it all twice-

I come up with the same advise-

you need specific proof most likely from a buddy-dont know what else you could use- to show that AO was used in the locale that your MOS was in.

Then if you get an IMO stating there is no other etiology for your disability but for the known carcinogenic Agent Orange and your direct exposure to it-

you are supporting a very probative claim.

I have stuff on the AO issues in this PC and 3 others-

I have all sorts of stuff showing when and where it was sprayed-

Hell - I bet they used in on Parris Island.

the VA doesnt care about that-

the AO exposure has to be proven in veterans who served in Thailand and Laos.

Have you requested that your company commander (wouldnt his name be in your military records) give you a buddy statement?

Someone in command where you were knew what was being sprayed-why, where and when.Also they had a supply roster. Maybe the engineering company handled that.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA Doctor in Oncology made a statement in his computer notes which is electonically signed stating that "He was stationed in Thailand on the Mekong River during the Vietnam war. Technically he was not in Vietnam. He states, however, that he was definitely exposed when it was used as a defoliant on the river. NHL is clearly one of the diseases associated with agent orange exposure. If he were exposed to agent orange, then it is quite probable that this is the cause of the NHL." Of couse it is clear in the total documetn that he is referring to myself Randall D. Thomas Sr. .......................

signed: FRED J. HINDLER

ATTENDING PHYSICIAN

03/19/2007 09:21

VAMC VA MEDICAL CENTER

800 ZORN AVENUE

lOUISVILLE KY 40206

As I said before I have a letter on ao exposure coming from vienam_war_vet and plan to have my lawyer put pressure on the BVA as regards the 1999 AO decision.

Botton line is I need for any fellow veteran exposed to agent orange at NKP to contact me.

Edited by rthomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awaiting buddy statement on just how we were both exposed to the herbicide "Agent Orange'......This Air Force Veteran wold welcome a post oh how you encountered Agent orange at NKP or any of the oher bases in Thailand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put me back on top. I need input from those Vetenas in

thailand, Laos, amd Cambodia........What is the staus of Secetary Nicholson's appeal re: Haasv.Nichoslxon ?????

Edited by rthomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put me back on top. I need input from those Vetenas in

thailand, Laos, amd Cambodia........What is the staus of Secetary Nicholson's appeal re: Haasv.Nichoslxon ?????

Doctor gave me the statement today that it was quite probably caused by agent orange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use