Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Heart Disease Rate Increase

Rate this question


stillhere

Question

I am rated 60%heart disease / 20% DBII / 10% NP left / 10% NP right I am being compensated at 70% VA Math.

Recently had another blockage issue in the heart and another stent implanted doc said limit duty next month and come back and see him for evaluation. Called the VA for advise as to rate increase they said would send paper work in 60 days and then file.

My questions are should I file for this rate increae or go with a NOD from my last award in Feb. 07

If I go with NOD (Sept.06 one year from that date)I was thinking of asking for a different award date. They only added the heart disease after I had a heart attack in Oct. 05 although I had complained of heart pain on my first claim in 03 and it was denied. I then reapplied in August of 06 and they again denied heart only after I had my heart attack in 05 did they finally allow the heart issue as secondary to DB2.

I feel it is obvious that something caused my heart issue and it was there long before Oct. 05 but all the test they where running stress, cardio and such showed nothing. Is this a CUE?

Anyhow all help would be appreciated on this matter. I have the feeling things are going down hill very quick and don't know how much more I can battle with them before I have another heart attack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Not a basis for CUE-

you still have other ways to go on this-

If you are not working and your SC disabilities are preventing you from working you should apply for TDIU- the 100% rate of VA comp-

2,200 a month?? I forget!-someone will correct

I will attach the TDIU form-

How did the VA consider you and then deny you for TDIU in the 70% decision?

That statement from VA in the 70% decision can shape what evidence they still need from you to award TDIU- if you arent working-

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry -I just noticed something-

you still can perform limited duty ?

This is possibly why the VA did not consider you yet for TDIU.

One thing about DMII- SC-

if VA can find that the heart disease was prior to the SC DMII , they can deny heart disease as secondary in vets who get the DMII diagnosis with heart disease too-

I mean- say vet has DMII with obvious heart disease mosst likely due to DMII.

The VA could find evidence showing the NSC heart disease predated the SC DMII and then fail to award as secondary.

The VA has done this and still tries to-

what bothers me the most is that DMII is the most underdiagnosed diseases in the US of A-per the ADA-

a vet could have DMII and one or two glucose blood tests at VA over a few months will not reveal whether the vet has high glucose

days before or after the test.

Even the HBIAC test has its limits.

So a vet could actually have diabetes for years and not even know it or have VA not diagnose it and then the vet sufferes from CAD BEFORE they diagnose the DMII-and then the VA can say this was NSC and predated the SC DMII and therefore isnt secondary.

A good IMO from a real doc who uses the ADA guidelines and knows all the literature that can define a specific type of heart disease as Exactly due to DMII-such as left ventricular hypertrophy-etc can help a vet get proper secondary as well as the proper EED on these claims.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply from reading other posts I am sure you are one of the best.

I am still working although I am not doing about half of what I used to. I am in sales now because of a hearing problem from Nam. But that is another story.

I would like to file a nod but if I got 100% I would still like to work for a few more years. I am strictly on comission so I hade dropped quite a bit in the past 3 years.

Should I try for the earlier award date for the heart disease? The VA told me to file for the rate increase for the recent surgery I was in the hospital 2 days and told no driving for a couple of days and then take it easy.

Thanks

Not a basis for CUE-

you still have other ways to go on this-

If you are not working and your SC disabilities are preventing you from working you should apply for TDIU- the 100% rate of VA comp-

2,200 a month?? I forget!-someone will correct

I will attach the TDIU form-

How did the VA consider you and then deny you for TDIU in the 70% decision?

That statement from VA in the 70% decision can shape what evidence they still need from you to award TDIU- if you arent working-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Stillhere

I don't think you have anything to lose by applying for the EED. All the VA can do is deny it and you will never get it unless you ask for it. The only thing is that if the Heart disease proceded the diagnosis of DMII the VA might very well say you had it before the DMII and not connect it. The VA did this with my PN even though I had the high glucose levels before the actual diagnosis of DMII. I got sc'ed for the PN eventually. Keep trying and don't give up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta

I know the VA tried to deny my PN as being secondary to DMII saying it existed prior to the DMII. This is an old trick on their part. I bet many thousands of vets are denied for secondary conditions due to DMII by the VA saying they existed prior. They are acting in bad faith even when you have a doctor saying the secondary condition is caused by DMII and the VA denies it. You know it they do it to you they are doing it to thousands of others. Nothing personal, just business as usual. How can any say this system is not adversarial?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John999,

My family doctor first diagnosed DB2 in 2001 I did not know about the presumed untill an legion newsletter in 2003 I applied for DB2 and heart disease as chest pains at that time and during the exam they came up with the PN. I had not even noticed that but I really do now.

Anyhow when I go back to my cardio doctor in May I am going to ask if he will write something for me an file for the EED of 2003 and see what they say. Unless my cardio doctor advises otherwise, I just have a hard time swallowing that this just came up in Oct. 05!!

By the way Berta last time I was in for surgery my cardio doc asked if I was still working!

Thanks,

Stillhere

I don't think you have anything to lose by applying for the EED. All the VA can do is deny it and you will never get it unless you ask for it. The only thing is that if the Heart disease proceded the diagnosis of DMII the VA might very well say you had it before the DMII and not connect it. The VA did this with my PN even though I had the high glucose levels before the actual diagnosis of DMII. I got sc'ed for the PN eventually. Keep trying and don't give up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use