We thought we should share this part of the rating decision. The VA can and does make a person laugh once in a while. Even our son,spotted this one and just shook his head in amazement.
In part, "We have assigned a 0 percent evaluation based on a review of private treatment reports, VA outpatient treatment reports to include recent VA exam which shows you with blood pressure readings of 182/78,179/82, 178/80. A noncompensable evaluation is assigned unless diastolic pressure in predominantly 100 or more; or unless systolic pressure is 160 or more; or unless the veteran has a history of diastolic presure 100 or more requiring continuous medication for control. There is no evidense of diastolic pressure of 100 or more; systolic pressure of 160 or more; or diastolic pressure of 100 or more requiring continual medication to control to warrent a higher evaluation."
This is one of the claims we thought we should ask for reconsideration on. Just because it should have been awarded at least 10% and maybe 20 as the medications have been increased 3 times in the last 8 months. Even the C+P doctor said to raise the medications during the exam for PTSD, he was concerned about the HPN.
Question
Guest jangrin
We thought we should share this part of the rating decision. The VA can and does make a person laugh once in a while. Even our son,spotted this one and just shook his head in amazement.
In part, "We have assigned a 0 percent evaluation based on a review of private treatment reports, VA outpatient treatment reports to include recent VA exam which shows you with blood pressure readings of 182/78,179/82, 178/80. A noncompensable evaluation is assigned unless diastolic pressure in predominantly 100 or more; or unless systolic pressure is 160 or more; or unless the veteran has a history of diastolic presure 100 or more requiring continuous medication for control. There is no evidense of diastolic pressure of 100 or more; systolic pressure of 160 or more; or diastolic pressure of 100 or more requiring continual medication to control to warrent a higher evaluation."
This is one of the claims we thought we should ask for reconsideration on. Just because it should have been awarded at least 10% and maybe 20 as the medications have been increased 3 times in the last 8 months. Even the C+P doctor said to raise the medications during the exam for PTSD, he was concerned about the HPN.
Jangrin
Edited by jangrin (see edit history)Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
Popular Days
Apr 29
4
Top Posters For This Question
jbasser 2 posts
Popular Days
Apr 29 2007
4 posts
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts