It is kind of complicated as the reason I got out. I had received an article 15 in January 2007. I served my punishment and eventually got re-promoted to e-4 then I was continuously harassed and belittled till the point of mental breakdown. After I told the military psychiatric doctor he diagnosed me with bi-polar, with anxiety condition. I was in service when that happened. It was obvious to everyone I was not like this before I joined, including my fiance who was with me for four years before I joined. The reason I got a general under honorable circumstances is because they put the article 15 as one of the reasons for discharge, despite me having served my punishment and having already been re promoted. The other reason plainly stated on my dd214 was axis-1 bipolar. and the article 15 could be argued as a direct result of being bipolar, it's just I was not diagnosed yet so they took it as direct disobedience. I was a good soldier before the trouble, afterward I was labeled a lousy soldier by our battalion CO. and he did everything in his power to make my life terrible, and constantly badgering me making me admit stuff I didn't do just so he could have someone to put stuff over on. My NCO was a lousy soldier, always drinking alcohol and taking naps and sending me to do all the work. Tells you something when they have been in the army 25 years and still E-5. I never served in combat. That does not mean I did not develop an issue. I was unnecessarily punished for other peoples mistakes, made to sleep only 1-1.5 hours a night for over 2 months. There were other things that happened that are between me and my therapist I do not wish to disclose but needless to say, it was a devastating and changed my life forever. I just want people to understand I am not looking for a handout. I don't think 2 therapist plus the 1 in service would make up diagnosis that directly points to military service as the reason i am unable to work. period. And it seems like it would be really difficult to call it pre-existing considering i was diagnosed in service and have only required treatment after service and absolutely no documented cases or symptoms before joining. So how could they call it pre-existing? My fiance and other people have been asked to submit their views, which they have, all concurring with time in service being the time I "changed for the worse"