HadIt.com Elder allan Posted January 18, 2010 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted January 18, 2010 DoD shows first signs of acknowledging burn-pit woes http://usweb07v.newsmemory.com/ee/armytime...&selDate=20 100125&goTo=A008&artid=2 By Kelly Kennedy 1/25/2010, page A11, Army Times kellykennedy@militarytimes.com Just after returning home from Afghanistan in 2002, Army Maj. Gen. Michael Dunlavey collapsed from what doctors first thought was a “near-fatal” heart attack. “But I’m a general and a judge,” he said with a laugh. “I never use my heart.” His blood work showed that it was actually a viral infection that had hit him “like a freight train.” After the attack, the then-56year-old nonsmoker developed a constant cough and he could never quite catch his breath. Now, his throat closes up at night and he often must gasp for air. “I’ve lost the ability to bring in oxygen,” he said. Dunlavey said he was exposed to particulate matter from burn pits and sand storms in Afghanistan. He began to wonder how the burn pits played into his symptoms after reading studies of bronchiolitis cases that doctors believed resulted from exposure to chemicals and ash emitted by the burning trash in the pits. Later, while being treated for his symptoms at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C., Dunlavey met other much-younger soldiers dealing with the same symptoms - but nobody seemed to be listening. The former commander of the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, found that his general officer status did not seem to carry weight, either. When he went before his evaluation board for medical retirement, he said a doctor told him his symptoms were “psychosomatic.” “They almost had me convinced I was a malingerer - until a heart scan inadvertently revealed scarring of my lungs,” he said. Signs of DoD recognition At a Senate Veterans Affairs Committee hearing on Oct. 8, the Pentagon finally took a step back from its months-long insistence that burn-pit smoke carries “no known long-term health effects.” R. Craig Postlewaite, the Pentagon’s acting director of force health protection and readiness, publicly acknowledged for the first time that the burn pits may be causing health damage. “We do feel like some people probably have suffered some untoward health effects” from burn pits, he told lawmakers. “We don’t feel like the numbers are large, based on the total numbers of people that were probably exposed to smoke throughout the theater.” He said about 56 percent of troops who have deployed to the war zones report being exposed to burn-pit smoke. In a Dec. 21 e-mail to Army Times, Postlewaite said: “DoD acknowledges that burn pit smoke causes acute health effects in some people consisting of irritated eyes and irritation of the upper respiratory system, which in some people can lead to a persistent cough. At this time, it is less clear what other longer-term health effects may be associated with burn pit smoke inhalation.” In December, Pentagon officials announced the launch of a study of the possible long-term effects of burn-pit smoke. “Our number one priority is the health of service members,” Postlewaite said. Adding up the costs Dunlavey has no patience for defense officials who insist that levels of particulate matter in the war zones are safe. “It’s about cost-benefit,” he said of the military’s approach to dealing with the huge amounts of potentially toxic trash and waste produced by U.S. forces in the war zones. The costs are considerable. A report last February by Col. John Cawthorne, Air Force deputy director of installations and mission support, said the average cost of “complex” clean-ups at some bases in Iraq - sorting, segregating, incinerating, landfilling with liners and transporting hazardous waste - would run $23 million to $37 million per base. Simpler clean-ups at other bases - “do what you can” in 100 days - would cost $1 million to $3 million per base. He estimated the total cost of cleaning up 65 U.S. bases in Iraq at $401 million to $750 million. But if epidemiology experts, doctors and service members who say burn pits are making them sick are right, the related health issues also could ultimately cost the government untold millions, just as Agent Orange did after Vietnam. Respiratory illnesses, cancers and other conditions linked to particulate matter among troops have been on the rise since 2001. Dr. Bob Miller, assistant professor of pulmonary and critical care medicine at Vanderbilt University, began testing soldiers at Fort Campbell, Ky., who were exposed to the Mishraq Sulfur Mine in Mosul, Iraq, when they began noticing their physical fitness run times were increasing. Biopsies showed bronchiolitis - a disease that essentially shuts down the small airways in the lungs. But as his work progressed, he found cases of bronchiolitis in 44 other soldiers at the post who also had deployed to Iraq but had not been exposed to the mine fire. He said people have called him since he discussed his work with Army Times several months ago to ask if he could test them as well. “Almost all reported inhalational exposures were common to the Iraqi experience, including fumes from burn pits, burning human waste, fire and dust from combat, burning oil and diesel exhaust,” he said at the same Oct. 8 Senate Veterans Affairs Committee hearing at which Postlewaite testified. “We have received … communications from soldiers and providers throughout the country, leading us to believe that this condition is present but not being diagnosed at other facilities,” Miller said. He told Army Times he did not think the damage came just from blowing sand because there was no evidence of silica in the lungs of the troops he tested. David Mannino of the division of pulmonary and critical care medicine at the University of Kentucky, said people exposed to dust, gases and fumes “can certainly develop respiratory symptomology like this.” “We have known for years that exposure to smoke by a firefighter, say, can result in bronchitis and bronchiectasis,” he said. “Exposure to any type of smoke can result in respiratory disease.” Dr. Coleen Weese, an expert in environmental medicine with the U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, has written a paper that notes the symptoms being reported are consistent with what would be expected from heavy exposure to particulate matter. “The potential for health hazards from this one is real,” said Weese, who is working on a study of long-term health effects of particulate matter in a young, healthy population. ‘Unusual’ findings Shira Kramer, an expert on environmental health and author of an epidemiology textbook, said it’s about more than potential. “Open, uncontrolled burning of solid and liquid wastes, including plastics, paper, wood, metals, oils, fuels, paint and human waste, generates some of the most harmful chemicals known to man and represents an unacceptable health risk,” she said. “You would not expect to see [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease] in a young, healthy population - certainly not in this age range. It’s an extremely unusual and unexpected finding.” There are two kinds of COPD: emphysema, which destroys the air sacs in the lungs, and chronic bronchitis, which causes airways in the lungs to swell. Both reduce lung capacity. Symptoms include coughing, fatigue, respiratory infections, shortness of breath and headaches. There is no cure. Dr. Anthony Szema, chief of the allergy section at the VA Medical Center in Northport, N.Y., told lawmakers in November that he is seeing more young veterans with respiratory problems. “Until 2004, I mostly saw 80year-olds,” Szema said. “From 2004 to present, I have begun seeing young men … previously healthy, capable of passing basic training and performing combat operations … [who are suffering] from a variety of respiratory illnesses, including asthma and difficulty breathing during exertion, and are not fit for continued military duty.” He said VA reports that the rate of new-onset adult asthma diagnoses in Iraq war veterans is double the rate for troops who did not deploy there. “It is common sense and widely known that smoke from any fire can affect health,” he said. □ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbsepter Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 I have actually aquired a letter that was produced for the Balad Airbase and the issue for the burn pit there. It was an "OSHA" type report. It was written in 2006 and outlines the issues that they found... " Balad's burn pit was quated as being the worst environmental site I have personally visited....." signed LTC Curtis. I am new to this and can forward the file to you if you need it. I cant seem to add the file here. gbsepter@aol.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
allan
DoD shows first signs of acknowledging burn-pit woes
http://usweb07v.newsmemory.com/ee/armytime...&selDate=20
100125&goTo=A008&artid=2
By Kelly Kennedy 1/25/2010, page A11, Army Times
kellykennedy@militarytimes.com
Just after returning home from Afghanistan in 2002, Army Maj. Gen. Michael
Dunlavey collapsed from what doctors first thought was a “near-fatal”
heart attack.
“But I’m a general and a judge,” he said with a laugh. “I never use my
heart.” His blood work showed that it was actually a viral infection that
had hit him “like a freight train.” After the attack, the then-56year-old
nonsmoker developed a constant cough and he could never quite catch his
breath. Now, his throat closes up at night and he often must gasp for air.
“I’ve lost the ability to bring in oxygen,” he said.
Dunlavey said he was exposed to particulate matter from burn pits and sand
storms in Afghanistan. He began to wonder how the burn pits played into his
symptoms after reading studies of bronchiolitis cases that doctors believed
resulted from exposure to chemicals and ash emitted by the burning trash in
the pits.
Later, while being treated for his symptoms at Walter Reed Army Medical
Center in Washington, D.C., Dunlavey met other much-younger soldiers dealing
with the same symptoms - but nobody seemed to be listening.
The former commander of the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, found
that his general officer status did not seem to carry weight, either. When
he went before his evaluation board for medical retirement, he said a doctor
told him his symptoms were “psychosomatic.” “They almost had me convinced
I was a malingerer - until a heart scan inadvertently revealed scarring of
my lungs,” he said.
Signs of DoD recognition
At a Senate Veterans Affairs Committee hearing on Oct. 8, the Pentagon
finally took a step back from its months-long insistence that burn-pit smoke
carries “no known long-term health effects.” R. Craig Postlewaite, the
Pentagon’s acting director of force health protection and readiness,
publicly acknowledged for the first time that the burn pits may be causing
health damage.
“We do feel like some people probably have suffered some untoward health
effects” from burn pits, he told lawmakers. “We don’t feel like the
numbers are large, based on the total numbers of people that were probably
exposed to smoke throughout the theater.” He said about 56 percent of
troops who have deployed to the
war zones report being exposed to burn-pit smoke.
In a Dec. 21 e-mail to Army Times, Postlewaite said: “DoD acknowledges that
burn pit smoke causes acute health effects in some people consisting of
irritated eyes and irritation of the upper respiratory system, which in some
people can lead to a persistent cough. At this time, it is less clear what
other longer-term health effects may be associated with burn pit smoke
inhalation.” In December, Pentagon officials announced the launch of a
study of the possible long-term effects of burn-pit smoke. “Our number one
priority is the health of service members,” Postlewaite said.
Adding up the costs
Dunlavey has no patience for defense officials who insist that levels of
particulate matter in the war zones are safe.
“It’s about cost-benefit,” he said of the military’s approach to dealing
with the huge amounts of potentially toxic trash and waste produced by U.S.
forces in the war zones.
The costs are considerable.
A report last February by Col. John Cawthorne, Air Force deputy director of
installations and mission support, said the average cost of “complex”
clean-ups at some bases in Iraq - sorting, segregating, incinerating,
landfilling with liners and transporting hazardous waste - would run $23
million to $37 million per base. Simpler clean-ups at other bases - “do
what you can” in 100 days - would cost $1 million to $3 million per base.
He estimated the total cost of cleaning up 65 U.S. bases in Iraq at $401
million to $750 million.
But if epidemiology experts, doctors and service members who say burn pits
are making them sick are right, the related health issues also could
ultimately cost the government untold millions, just as Agent Orange did
after Vietnam. Respiratory illnesses, cancers and other conditions linked to
particulate matter among troops have been on the rise since 2001.
Dr. Bob Miller, assistant professor of pulmonary and critical care medicine
at Vanderbilt University, began testing soldiers at Fort Campbell, Ky., who
were exposed to the Mishraq Sulfur Mine in Mosul, Iraq, when they began
noticing their physical fitness run times were increasing. Biopsies showed
bronchiolitis - a disease that essentially shuts down the small airways in
the lungs.
But as his work progressed, he found cases of bronchiolitis in 44 other
soldiers at the post who also had deployed to Iraq but had not been exposed
to the mine fire.
He said people have called him since he discussed his work with Army Times
several months ago to ask if he could test them as well.
“Almost all reported inhalational exposures were common to the Iraqi
experience, including fumes from burn pits, burning human waste, fire and
dust from combat, burning oil and diesel exhaust,” he said at the same Oct.
8 Senate Veterans Affairs Committee hearing at which Postlewaite testified.
“We have received … communications from soldiers and providers throughout
the country, leading us to believe that this condition is present but not
being diagnosed at other facilities,” Miller said.
He told Army Times he did not think the damage came just from blowing sand
because there was no evidence of silica in the lungs of the troops he
tested.
David Mannino of the division of pulmonary and critical care medicine at the
University of Kentucky, said people exposed to dust, gases and fumes “can
certainly develop respiratory symptomology like this.” “We have known for
years that exposure to smoke by a firefighter, say, can result in bronchitis
and bronchiectasis,” he said. “Exposure to any type of smoke can result in
respiratory disease.”
Dr. Coleen Weese, an expert in environmental medicine with the U.S. Army
Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, has written a paper
that notes the symptoms being reported are consistent with what would be
expected from heavy exposure to particulate matter.
“The potential for health hazards from this one is real,” said Weese, who
is working on a study of long-term health effects of particulate matter in a
young, healthy population.
‘Unusual’ findings
Shira Kramer, an expert on environmental health and author of an
epidemiology textbook, said it’s about more than potential.
“Open, uncontrolled burning of solid and liquid wastes, including plastics,
paper, wood, metals, oils, fuels, paint and human waste, generates some of
the most harmful chemicals known to man and represents an unacceptable
health risk,” she said. “You would not expect to see [chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease] in a young, healthy population - certainly not in this
age range. It’s an extremely unusual and unexpected finding.” There are
two kinds of COPD: emphysema, which destroys the air sacs in the lungs, and
chronic bronchitis, which causes airways in the lungs to swell. Both reduce
lung capacity. Symptoms include coughing, fatigue, respiratory infections,
shortness of breath and headaches. There is no cure.
Dr. Anthony Szema, chief of the allergy section at the VA Medical Center in
Northport, N.Y., told lawmakers in November that he is seeing more young
veterans with respiratory problems.
“Until 2004, I mostly saw 80year-olds,” Szema said. “From 2004 to
present, I have begun seeing young men … previously healthy, capable of
passing basic training and performing combat operations … [who are
suffering] from a variety of respiratory illnesses, including asthma and
difficulty breathing during exertion, and are not fit for continued military
duty.” He said VA reports that the rate of new-onset adult asthma diagnoses
in Iraq war veterans is double the rate for troops who did not deploy there.
“It is common sense and widely known that smoke from any fire can affect
health,” he said. □
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
Popular Days
Jan 18
1
Jan 20
1
Top Posters For This Question
allan 1 post
gbsepter 1 post
Popular Days
Jan 18 2010
1 post
Jan 20 2010
1 post
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now