I found this in the M21-1, but don't know if I should include this in my husband's claim, since it might have changed.
M21-1, Part I April 19, 2002
Change 86 Erratum
a. General. If entitlement to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114 exists on account of the loss, or loss of use, of both lower extremities, the veteran also meets the requirements for specially adapted housing under 38 U.S.C. 2101. Conversely, entitlement to specially adapted housing because of loss or loss of use of both lower extremities also meets the requirements for corresponding SMC entitlement.
Does anyone here know if this has been changed since this change? And what does Erratum mean here?
Question
Guest Morgan
I found this in the M21-1, but don't know if I should include this in my husband's claim, since it might have changed.
M21-1, Part I April 19, 2002
Change 86 Erratum
a. General. If entitlement to SMC under 38 U.S.C. 1114 exists on account of the loss, or loss of use, of both lower extremities, the veteran also meets the requirements for specially adapted housing under 38 U.S.C. 2101. Conversely, entitlement to specially adapted housing because of loss or loss of use of both lower extremities also meets the requirements for corresponding SMC entitlement.
Does anyone here know if this has been changed since this change? And what does Erratum mean here?
Edited by MorganLink to comment
Share on other sites
Popular Days
Oct 16
2
Oct 15
1
Oct 19
1
Popular Days
Oct 16 2005
2 posts
Oct 15 2005
1 post
Oct 19 2005
1 post
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts