I was a member of this group 10 years ago and we laughed at the time vets had spent waiting for decisions from the VA. Some only a few years of dealing with the VA, then there were many more waiting 10 to 20 years, I had recorded 30 years back then. Now ten years later the VA will finely after many remands, and filling out VA form 9 three times, (the VA still is misplacing our records,) let me appeal my claims to the Court. Maybe.
(From a remanded appeal by the Court in 2001.)
I am appealing a number of issues of the remand but they all end up at the same starting point for service connection.
When an initial claim is taken (1971), is it a CUE if there is proof that needed assistance was not provided? If the VA at the time was in complete control of the original service records and medical records (more then two years of Naval hospitalizations and outpatient treatments), that clearly prove service related injuries causing symptoms of disabilities; is there not a law that this evidence must be prepared by the RO for consideration and adjudication for service connection? Can this evidence show CUE or something else, to prove my appeal to the Court? The VA in it's last Board denial states that after 40 years of continuous request (which I thought were claims for benefits of veterans benefits of injuries clearly shown were received while on duty in the service, treated with two years plus of Naval hospitalizations and medical outpatients treatments and a large number of hospitalizations in VA and private hospitals, with a number of surgeries with years of outpatient treatments, that I had not applied for a 'formal claim' yet.
Reason for adjudication: Continued claims from 1971 for service-connection and veterans benefits. In a request made in 2005, by my late lawyer, for compensation of listed service-connected disabilities, found in many VA records and decisions, was turned into a 'new claim' by the VA. Months of letters, faxes and e-mails explaining that the service connection had been ruled on in 1970's and I believed, granted, were ignored and went unanswered by the VA's RO. Service connection was re-awarded for the service-connected disabilities and now the compensation claim has been awarded.
Question
DisVet in Belgium
I was a member of this group 10 years ago and we laughed at the time vets had spent waiting for decisions from the VA. Some only a few years of dealing with the VA, then there were many more waiting 10 to 20 years, I had recorded 30 years back then. Now ten years later the VA will finely after many remands, and filling out VA form 9 three times, (the VA still is misplacing our records,) let me appeal my claims to the Court. Maybe.
(From a remanded appeal by the Court in 2001.)
I am appealing a number of issues of the remand but they all end up at the same starting point for service connection.
When an initial claim is taken (1971), is it a CUE if there is proof that needed assistance was not provided? If the VA at the time was in complete control of the original service records and medical records (more then two years of Naval hospitalizations and outpatient treatments), that clearly prove service related injuries causing symptoms of disabilities; is there not a law that this evidence must be prepared by the RO for consideration and adjudication for service connection? Can this evidence show CUE or something else, to prove my appeal to the Court? The VA in it's last Board denial states that after 40 years of continuous request (which I thought were claims for benefits of veterans benefits of injuries clearly shown were received while on duty in the service, treated with two years plus of Naval hospitalizations and medical outpatients treatments and a large number of hospitalizations in VA and private hospitals, with a number of surgeries with years of outpatient treatments, that I had not applied for a 'formal claim' yet.
Reason for adjudication: Continued claims from 1971 for service-connection and veterans benefits. In a request made in 2005, by my late lawyer, for compensation of listed service-connected disabilities, found in many VA records and decisions, was turned into a 'new claim' by the VA. Months of letters, faxes and e-mails explaining that the service connection had been ruled on in 1970's and I believed, granted, were ignored and went unanswered by the VA's RO. Service connection was re-awarded for the service-connected disabilities and now the compensation claim has been awarded.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
Popular Days
Jan 23
1
Jan 25
1
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 1 post
DisVet in Belgium 1 post
Popular Days
Jan 23 2010
1 post
Jan 25 2010
1 post
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now