The Supreme Court overturning the Chevron doctrine may lead to changes in how veterans file disability compensation claims with the VA. Veterans disputing VA rulings might benefit from the ruling, as it removes the requirement for courts to follow federal agencies’ interpretations of vague laws.
Highlights:
- Historical background: The Chevron doctrine, created in 1984, obliged courts to defer to federal agencies’ explanations of vague statutes.
- In June 2024, the Supreme Court overturned Chevron and mandated that courts independently interpret statutes.
- Veterans may benefit from this change as it could cause more favorable decisions for those appealing VA claim denials, with courts no longer deferring to VA interpretations.
- The impact of Buffington v. McDonough case is worth noting. The impact of the Buffington v. It is worth noting the impact of the Buffington v. McDonough case, where the VA’s interpretation of a statute denied Thomas Buffington, an Air Force veteran, almost three years of retroactive disability payments. The new ruling could have led courts to rule in Buffington’s favor, independent of the VA’s interpretation
-
Implications:
- Increased judicial scrutiny of VA rulings
- Potential for more favorable outcomes for veterans
- Possible longer wait times for decisions due to increased litigation
- Uncertainty and inconsistency in rulings across jurisdictions
While this change offers potential benefits for veterans challenging benefit denials, it may also lead to longer processing times and increased complexity in the appeals process.
Sources:
The History of the Chevron Doctrine FindLaw 01/19/2024