This eBook will teach you how to get C-Files (paper and electronic) from the VA Regional Office.
How to Get your VA C-File

  • Topics

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ebenefits Claim Status????
      EBenefits is not that reliable.  You have a congressperson involved, no?  That would be a response to your request for help to a congress representative I would think.     Try to call Peggy (the 800 827-1000 number) and ask them what the status is.  Its more likely that they can give more complete info to you.
    • ratings
      In EBenefits, under Disabilities, it will show exactly what your current ratings are.  This should show if you have 2 10's or 1 10, same with the back rating.   I would think that they are just updated verifications of SC. One spine rating cover sacroiliac, the lumbar and thoracic sections all in just 1 rating, so you can not have 2 separate ratings on DDD for L5/S1.
    • Untold Award percentage
      Hey Broncovet i had a letter say 50% 40 30(3x) 20 and 10(13X) but then those disappear on the next letter. what are your thoughts  
    • ratings
      sorry I do have others,  attached is all that i have been awarded.   I will have to look for those decision letters also degenerative disc disease, L5-S1 20% Service Connected   11/13/2002 depressive disorder 50% Service Connected   10/24/2014 peripheral neuropathy, bilateral lower extremities   Not Service Connected     esophageal reflux (formerly DC 7205) 10% Service Connected   01/29/2009 abdominal surgical scar 10% Service Connected   07/23/2003 hiatal hernia secondary to esophageal reflux surgery 0% Service Connected   07/23/2003 right ankle condition   Not Service Connected     allergic rhinitis (claimed as sinus condition) 30% Service Connected   10/24/2014 sleep apnea   Not Service Connected     hyperparathyroidism 0% Service Connected   09/21/1993 hypertension 10% Service Connected   01/29/2009 residual scar, status post adenoma resection (formerly DC 7800) 20% Service Connected   03/06/2014 degenerative disc disease, L5-S1 20% Service Connected   09/26/2003
    • C&P Exam Completed [Bad Vibe]
      Did the examiner use any type of measuring tools for your ROM?   Shoulder and Arm Limitation of Motion Code 5201: If the arm cannot be raised to the side more than 25°, it is rated 40% for the dominant arm and 30% for the non-dominant arm. If it cannot be raised more than 45° from the side, it is rated 30% for the dominant arm and 20% for the non-dominant arm. If the arm can be raised to shoulder level (90°), then it is rated 20% for either arm.    
    • My husband died in motorcycle accident
      Found this today; Competent lay evidence means any evidence not requiring that the proponent have specialized education, training, or experience. Lay evidence is competent if it is provided by a person who has knowledge of facts or circumstances and conveys matters that can be observed and described by a lay person. 38 C.F.R. § 3.159. Lay evidence may be competent and sufficient to establish a diagnosis of a condition when: (1) a layperson is competent to identify the medical condition (i.e., when the layperson will be competent to identify the condition where the condition is simple, for example a broken leg, and sometimes not, for example, a form of cancer); (2) the layperson is reporting a contemporaneous medical diagnosis, or; (3) lay testimony describing symptoms at the time supports a later diagnosis by a medical professional. Jandreau v. Nicholson, 492 F. 3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2007); see also Davidson v. Shinseki, 581 F.3d 1313 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (where widow seeking service connection for cause of death of her husband, the Veteran, the Court holding that medical opinion not required to prove nexus between service connected mental disorder and drowning which caused Veteran's death). In essence, lay testimony is competent when it regards the readily observable features or symptoms of injury or illness and "may provide sufficient support for a claim of service connection." Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465 (1994). In ascertaining the competency of lay evidence, the Courts have generally held that a layperson is not capable of opining on matters requiring medical knowledge. Ruten v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 183 (1997). In certain instances, however, lay evidence has been found to be competent with regard to a disease with "unique and readily identifiable features" that is "capable of lay observation." See, e.g., Barr v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 303 (2007) (concerning varicose veins); see also Jandreau v. Nicholson, 492 F. 3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (a dislocated shoulder); Charles v. Principi, 16 Vet. App. 370 (2002) (tinnitus); Falzone v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 398 (1995) (flatfeet). Laypersons have been found to not be competent to provide evidence in more complex medical situations. See Woehlaert v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 456 (2007) (concerning rheumatic fever).         The whole effect of PTSD can be observed by a wife, who is a lay person.  Her statement is a powerful tool, as shown in the BVA rulings, when it is not a complex medical issue.  Behavior can be readily observed in this case, carelessness, thrill seeking, dangerous behavior is something that you can assert as a lay person.  Writing the statement, I would describe his behavior before and after, deliberately drawing out the changes in behavior and how you note them, and why/how you believe it contributed to the accident.  As long as you dont try to inject medical expertise, they can not ignore your statement.  If you son is capable of doing this same thing, and of sufficient age to understand what it means, his statement would be admissible as well.  Friends, family, employers, also can provide lay statements to the effect of behavior that was risky and dangerous.  That sense of excitement, or thrills, can be directly attributed to PTSD by a medical professional.
    • Ebenefits Claim Status????
      I have a claim I that was put in 3/20/16 its red flashed for homeless and FDC however it has been closed I looked  on E Benefits and saw that is status was no longer open saw no letters being mailed out just close. When  I looked further on my page on the left in the my profile   section under disability portion of my claim on E benefits where they have my disabilities listed at the very Bottom as Pending Disabilities then it Table of pending disabilities it say  a Congressional Inquiry 5/18/2016 New and Folliculitus  dated back to 3/20/2014 what does that mean the 2014 case is an appeal is this about to be rated is that why its in Pending Disabliites??? Help Pending Disabilities Table of Pending Disabilities Disability Submitted Type Actions Congressional Inquiry 05/18/2016 NEW   Folliculitis Face/beard 03/20/2014 NEW
    • VSO
      I believe that I have and yes this is a remand that back to the regional to appeal board then to my VSO. Everytime I check my file location it shows it as being with  my VSO at the board. All the document I sent to the AMC shows as being unsoliciated. But  since I haven't  received  anything from VA or DAV since then I'm lost about my claim.
    • ratings
      MOstly, you will have to read your decisions to see if they are seperate ratings.  What do they say?  The VA combines, not adds, ratings, using the combined rating table.  There is also a bilateral factor, if applicable.   If you are at 90%, there is something else going on, as those neither combine nor add to 90 percent.  Something is wrong somewhere.  

  • Veteran to Veteran providing FREE information and community to veterans since 1997.

    I am proud that I've been able to offer all that has for free for 19 years and continue to do so. does accept contributions to help with costs we also offer paid ad free subscriptions. None of the paid options are required. The forum, the website, news site and podcast are free and will remain so. If you choose to support the site with a contribution or a subscription it is appreciated but never required. If you choose to make a contribution or purchase an ad free subscription, you can do so here. 


Gulf War Task Force Draft Report

6 posts in this topic


email from VA Media Press Room:

"Recent VA News Releases

Draft Gulf War Task Force Report Is Released

Report Redefines How Care and Services Are Provided

to Gulf War Veterans

WASHINGTON (Oct. 21, 2011)- Today, Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric K. Shinseki announced that the Department's Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses Task Force has completed the draft of a comprehensive report that will outline how the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) addresses the concerns of Veterans who deployed during the Gulf War in 1990 and 1991.

"This report provides a roadmap for our continued enhancements in our care and services we provide to Gulf War Veterans," said Shinseki. "We will be applying lessons learned from this report to Veterans of all eras."

Notification of the draft written report is published in the Federal Register, and the draft written report addresses seven areas where VA provides services for this group of Veterans.

Over the past year, the task force has examined, evaluated, designated and adjusted the initial roadmap outlined in last year's report. VA has designated steps to improve care and services to Gulf War I Veterans and these improvements are becoming a part of our culture and operations.

This year's report focuses on improvements in the delivery of health care for Gulf War Veterans. One of the most substantial additions is modifications to clinical care models used for Gulf War Veterans, which is the most critical point of service VA provides. There are better linkages between specialty knowledge and services at the basic point of care. Clinical research and development is significantly contributing new concepts and methods to clinical practice and clinical education throughout VA.

Two new positions were established in the Office of Research and Development for deployment and Desert Shield and Desert Storm health-related issues. Both positions have been filled and are enhancing research efforts for Gulf War Veterans and will continue to do so in the coming years.

VA is also strengthening partnerships and medical surveillance to address the potential health impacts on Veterans from the environmental exposures on today's battlefield. Additionally, VA continues to use social media to improve communication with Gulf War Veterans.

The Chairman of the Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses Task Force is John R. Gingrich, chief of staff at VA, a retired Army officer who also served in the Gulf War.

"To ensure we are tracking the needs of our Veterans, we want to get feedback from Gulf War Veterans on this draft report," said Gingrich. "Their feedback is critical to our efforts to understand and serve their specific needs. Therefore, we hope they take advantage of one of the different opportunities to provide feedback that we have created for them."

As a first step, VA is seeking public comments on the draft written report before final publication. The public notice and instructions for how to submit electronic and comments via postal mail will be posted at<>, and the draft written report will be open for comment for 30 days. In addition, VA recognizes that a great number of Gulf War Veterans use the Internet on a daily basis to share their ideas and concerns, so VA has also created a public discussion board on the seven recommendations at: To view the report without making recommendations, please visit VA's website at"

# # #


Anyone can comment at the Fed Register site after reading this draft report availabvle also as pdf at the VA main web site.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't looked at it yet, but at first glance of the article it sounds like a great opportunity for GW vets to weigh in. If it is a request for input, please make every effort to get as many members in the forums to provide their feedback!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of us here have taken the opportunity to comment at the Federal Register Site regarding the many issues there that regard veterans and also most importantly proposed rules to put into 38 USC,38 CFR that directly affected compensation benefits.

One example is the new PTSD reg I posted here when it was up for public comment.I recognized 2 or 3 hadit vets names as commenters -maybe there were more.

That reg had 600 to 800 comments publised at the Federal Register Site. Every single comment there is considered. Although many comments came from disabled PTSD vets themselves, attorneys, advocates and service reps commented as well.

My biggest gripe with those regs in my public comment on the new PTSD regs is now before the US CAVC under the auspices of notable attorney Rich Cohen NOVA and joined by NVLSP and two other vet orgs.Others griped too. The new PTSD regs are unfair to many.

Last time I talked to him via email-that case was still before the court.

It just goes to show that these comments can influence any eventual regs or outcomes of anything that gets on the Federal Register site as it affects veterans.

It would be nice to see that MANY Gulf WAr veterans will read the draft and comment on it.

Battles are fought in yards not miles.

Even one comment at the Federal Register site can lead to more then we might think. I was the sole commenter on a proposed rule at the VA web site last year.

I got an email from VA that my comment was inappropriate.But they left it at the Fed reg site.Inappropriate-because they dont want to address the issue I brought up.

It opened up a bag of worms for VA - it is a matter that would only affect a certain few claimants and not a claims issue but nevertheless-

it is a time consuming battle I have just begun.

Every single comment anyone makes on this draft GW report will matter.

Edited by Berta

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this great information! You are a godsend! I am still new to this and all of this is so overwhelming. I have contacted the VA Environmental Health Coordinator trying to get an appointment to get my GW Registry Health Exam. It took a few months of phone tag, leaving numerous messages, physically going to the office (which the Coordinator was never in) and finally emailing. Still was given the generic response, "Someone will send you an appointment in the future". From some of the issues I have read at the site you provided in this thread, I see that I am not the only vet suffering from issues VA is trying to blow off and say is not associated with my deployments. I just received my C-File (another thank you for leading me to that), and I am in the process of combing through it (overwhelming).

I'm breaking it down into parts since it is so much to process, but I am finding so many discrepencies and I do not know where to begin to dispute them. I know this is not the topic to bring this up in and I apologize, but I need some assistance.

I am going to the RO tomorrow to get in to see a DAV rep, but from some of the experiences you guys have had with them, I'm not sure I want to go that route. I tried using my VSO, but they were a waste a time....I knew more about some things than they did, which was not a vote of confidence. Been blown off and misdirected for so long, I don't know how to handle the claims process. Can you help?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The formal 21-526 form has to be prepared.

List all of your documented disabilities-

List first, those disabilitys that you have or can obtain a nexus to your service (th strongest ones for potential SC )(nexus- meaning the link to your service)to include any disabilities you have that fall into the GWV presumptives as to "qualifying"disabilities as explained in detail here at hadit in our GWV forum.

Go over the info there or listen to the SVR show I did available here in our SVR archives on the Nine additional GW presumptives.

The C file can help but you need copies of all VA records and can tell VA where to get (unless you have them yourself to send copies to VA) of any private medical records you have.

The Med recs can be requested from the VAMC whch treats you.

You also need a complete copy of your SMRs and service personal file obtainable via the National Archives site NARA.

Their Homepage has ionfo how to do that on line.

Your disabilities could be either directly due to service or come under the presumptive regulations.

Claims have to be clearly stated.

I feel my current disability of XXXXX is directly due to my military service because my SMRs will reveal I was treated for this while in the Military.I enclose copies of my SMRs dated stating........... in order to support my claim.

Or I feel I have an undiagnosed illness (state what it is symtomatically) that was caused by my Gulf War service and request my claim be considered under the Gulf War Presumptive regulations.

Avoid using Gulf War Syndrome as this is not a VA disability. The regs fully describe what the GW disabilities are as presumptives.

"A statutory presumption exists for chronic disabilities resulting

from an undiagnosed illness which became manifest either during

active service in the Southwest Asia Theater of operations during

the Persian Gulf War or to a degree of 10 percent or more not

later than December 31, 2011, confirmed by objective indications.

See 38 U.S.C.A. § 1117; 38 C.F.R. § 3.317(a)(2)(ii) (emphasis

added). As noted in the Introduction, the Appellant served in

the Southwest Asia theater from August 8, 1990 to April 5, 1991.

The first criterion of the presumption is satisfied." from a BVA decision

Then begin to gather all medical evidence you can to prove your claim.

The statutory presumption is explained in the BVA quote.

Direct SC involves inservice evidence.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke too soon- you already have 60% now so no need for the 21- 526.

Also raise in the claim any potential for a secondary disability to any of the 60% disabilities.

If you are unemployed file also for TDIU (form 21-8940)

Also make sure the claim states the branch of service you were in that was the nexus branch-as I see you had 2 separate branches you served in.

Make sure if you also apply for SSDI (which I suggest too if you are not working)

that SSDI has that info too.

My deceased husbands both had two service periods.

The most recent husband forgot to put USN on his SSA app and happened to mention it to the SSA woman because she said her son or someone had just joined the Navy. She said We show you were USMC, which he was , but also said the USN DD 214 and service info would bring his SSA check up a little and it did.

Also the VA can get that stuff mixed up too if a vet served in Army Vietnam for example and claimed AO disability but also was in different branch as well and served in a non AO country, the VA could easily think they had no AO exposure.

This needs to be clarified in your claim.

Edited by Berta

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now