jamescripps2

Did you click on the link, the document is 85 pages long and contains information on a lot of military post and bases where A O was used and tested.

Just a little research work that I did in relation to the Agent Orange Committee, hope it helps someone else. Note pages 49 & 50. I worked as a game warden at Fort Gordon in close association with the Forestry Division. 1967-1969. My diseases are chloracne, diabetes, heart failure etc. http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/reading_room/T...lHerbicides.pdf Site 21 Location: Fort Gordon, Augusta, Georgia Fort Chaffee, Fort Smith, Arkansas Apalachicola National Forest, Sopchoppy, Florida Date → July 1967 – October 1967 Activity Description: During the period December 1966 to October 1967, the newly named “Plant Science Laboratories” at Fort Detrick initiated a comprehensive short-term project to evaluate desiccants and herbicidal mixtures as rapid-acting defoliants. The objectives of this study were to evaluate rapid-acting desiccants as defoliants and to assess the defoliation response of woody vegetation to mixtures of herbicides and/or desiccants. The criteria for assessment was based principally on rapidity of action, but included other features such as safety and ease of handling, compatibility with dissemination systems, and low toxicity to man and wildlife. The approach to the objective of an improved rapid-acting defoliant involved three phases: (1) evaluation of commercially available rapid desiccants or contact herbicides; (2) evaluation of improved formulations of rapid desiccants developed under industry contacts and by in-house effort; (3) development and evaluation of desiccant-herbicide mixtures containing the rapid defoliant characteristics with the sustained long-term effects of Orange and other Tactical Herbicides. The project required an immediate access to a diversity of woody vegetation. Accordingly, Fort Detrick arranged for test locations at Fort Gordon near Augusta, Georgia; Fort Chaffee near Fort Smith, Arkansas, and Apalachicola National Forest near Sopchoppy, Florida. The Georgia site was described as a warm temperate, humid, moderate rainfall climate with deep, well-drained sands in rolling topography. The vegetation type was an oakhickory- pine forest. The Arkansas site was described as a temperate continental, moderate rainfall climate with fine sandy loam soils in rolling topography. The vegetation type was an oak-hickory forest. The Apalachicola National Forest site was described as a subtropical, humid, moderate precipitation climate with sandy soils in a flat poorly drained topography. The vegetation type was described as a Southern mixed forest. All sites were selected because of their isolation from any local human populations, e.g., in Florida, the site was a ridge located in a swamp forest. Assessment: The desiccants selected for evaluation included Herbicide Blue (a tactical herbicide), and the commercial desiccants diquat, paraquat, dinitrobutylphenol 50 (DNBP), pentachlorophenol (PCP), hexachloroacetone (HCA), and monosodium methanearsonate (MSMA), pentachloro-pentenoic acid (AP-20), endothall, and various mixed formulations of these desiccants. The systemic herbicides included the two tactical herbicides Orange and White; the potassium salt, triisopropanolamine salts, and the isooctyl ester of picloram; and, a ethylhexyl ester of 2,4,5-T mixed with HCA. Mixtures of propanil, nitrophenol, linuron, and silvex were also evaluated. All chemicals were furnished by Fort Detrick. Aerial application at these three sites were made with a Bell G-2 helicopter equipped with two 40-gallon tanks and a 26-foot boom with 6-inch nozzle positions adaptable for volume deliveries of 3, 6, or 10 gallons per acre in a 50-foot swath. Spray equipment, pilot, and support were furnished under contract with Allied Helicopter Service of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Aerial applications were made on duplicate 3-acre plots, 200 by 660 feet in dimension. A sampling and evaluation trail was established in each plot on a diagonal beginning at 100 feet from one corner. Major species were marked along 500 feet of this transect and individual plants were identified by combinations of colored plastic ribbons. A minimum of 10 individuals of each species was marked unless fewer were present. Evaluations were made at 1-, 5-, 10-, 30-, and 60-day intervals by experienced Fort Detrick personnel. At each evaluation period the identical marked individuals of the major species were rated for defoliation and desiccation. At each location, approximately 475 gallons (~10 drums) of Herbicide Blue, 95 gallons (~2 drums) of Herbicide Orange, and 6 gallons of Herbicide White were expended. The assistance of Department of Army forestry personnel at Fort Gordon, Fort Chaffee, and the 3rd and 4th Army Headquarters were acknowledged in the report for their support in the selection and preparation of sites in Georgia and Arkansas. The land and facilities for the Florida tests were provided by the Supervisor, Apalachicola National Forest, Tallahassee, Florida. Personnel from the Physical Sciences Division, Fort Detrick assisted in the development of formulations and preparations of field test mixtures. They also provided the data on the physical characteristics of the candidate tactical defoliants and mixtures. Sources: Darrow RA, Frank JR, Martin JW, Demaree, KD, Creager RA (1971): Field Evaluation of Desiccants and Herbicide Mixtures as Rapid Defoliants. Technical Report 114, Plant Sciences Laboratories, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland. Document unclassified but subject to special export control. Available from the Defense Documentation Center, Accession Number AD 880685. Pass it along, it is new information.

Because you won we all feel like we won in some small way too. I would love to feel the full weight of winning my own claim some day, but to be able to celebrate your victory will do for now.

Pete, was your response and result favorable to your claim?

If you send a respectfully written, and well worded letter by e-mail you will get a response. I got a letter from the White House after two weeks and my regional office called me to respond to my complaints as directed by the office of the president. Then I recieved a letter from the RO saying that my letter to the president had caused a review of my C file and that they had to respond back to the president with an answer. It was the first time that the RO has ever called me! Of course they will probabaly loose my file when the review is done with. I also sent the same letter Via e-mail to five congressmen and the Secretary of The Department of Veterans Affairs. I do know that the Secretary and at least one congressman responded to the RO. You know what they say about the squeekey wheel? Time will tell. I think that after more than two years of fighting the Varo, I was able to smile about it for a little while. They must have been getting one of those letters every day for awhile, HA HA Here is the e-mail address, please use it with all of the respect for the office of the President that it deserves. "George W. Bush" <president@whitehouse.gov>