Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Wife Has Cancer

Rate this question


Jerry_O

Question

My wife who retired in Jan 2003 was diagnosed with malignant breast cancer last week. She was given hormone threapy while in service and had several cyst removed from her breast. Would anyone know if hormone threaphy which has been know to cause breast cancer or anything about treatment or VA services for breast cancer. She is 60% because of feet and bone matters.

I know must of ya'all are male type vet's but we all love our women that stood by us and we especially love the women who served by our side. She did both! Waited until the kids were grown and then went in. She had her degree and WANTED to serve as an NCO - that was her dream and she served well - retired as a first shirt.

Thanks Vets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Jerry,

You and your wife should ask a doctor if her hormone therapy could have been the casue of her breast cancer. If he/she says it's a possibility, then they should put that in writing. This is what the VA will need to award service-connection.

Vike 17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jerry,

You sound very proud of your wife :D My husband retired as a shirt too.

Hormone replacement therapy HAS been linked to breat cancer, but it is not a strong enough link to be considered a "given." Though it COULD be a possibility.

There are so many different TYPES of breast cancer. If your wife's breast cancer was one of the hormone sensitive types, then the possibility would be more likely.

I agree with Vike. Ask her doctor what he / she thinks. And if they think there is a strong connection, or even a "more likely than not" then see if you can get them to write an opinion.

If they think it is a probability, or even a possibility - but aren't willing to write an opinion - then you might want to ask for a referral to a doctor who will.

You can also find out as much as you can about the type of cancer your wife has - and do some research on it and see how much of a connection you can find to that type of cancer. But then - once again, you will want to find a doctor who will make that connection. Dr's who publish articles on the topic may be someone who can help you - or refer you.

Simply finding evidence that hormone therapy CAN cause breast cancer won't be strong enough. You will need someone who is medically qualified to give an opinion that there is a strong probabilty that the hormone therapy your wife had in service is related to her breast cancer.

OR there might be some other service related links you haven't considered yet.

Free

My wife who retired in Jan 2003 was diagnosed with malignant breast cancer last week. She was given hormone threapy while in service and had several cyst removed from her breast. Would anyone know if hormone threaphy which has been know to cause breast cancer or anything about treatment or VA services for breast cancer. She is 60% because of feet and bone matters.

I know must of ya'all are male type vet's but we all love our women that stood by us and we especially love the women who served by our side. She did both! Waited until the kids were grown and then went in. She had her degree and WANTED to serve as an NCO - that was her dream and she served well - retired as a first shirt.

Thanks Vets.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2002 - my doc recommended I do HRT for some of the problems I was having. After questions he asked and seeing my family history, we decided a little pain was better than a higher risk of getting cancer. Like Free said there is a Link - in some women the risk is higher.

Here's an article I found on the subject.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16206352/

Sarah

50% SC

Sarah's Website

Keep smiling, people will wonder what you're up to!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jerry O,

I wanted to add my prayers and support to your wife and family!

I think that hormones did or could have played a role. I had uterine cancer several years ago, and my doctor told me that hormone replacement for my hysterectomy wasn't possible. He told me that the hormones promoted cancer growth. So, I think it is worth checking into!

Again....love and prayers to your family!

Gwen


Wife of 100% TDIU P&T Vietnam Veteran










Link to comment
Share on other sites

There could be a nexus to the inservice cysts.

Also there is considerable information on the net that links hormone usage to breast cancer- such as :

http://www.oralchelation.com/calcium/footbone/fbartifi.htm

Also the foot and bones problems-

the meds for these conditions might have a linkage to her cancer.

The type of hormones she took, the cause of the cysts and the treatment and her full SMRs and VA and private medical records could possibly reveal a linkage that the VA would service connect.

However all of the abstracts and medical reviews on the net- while they would help show the nexus- would also need a strong IMO to back this claim up.

I think this should be pursued and she should file a claim.

"Updated: 6:52 p.m. ET April 18, 2007

ATLANTA - New government numbers give some of the strongest evidence yet that menopause hormones can raise the risk of breast cancer.

Rates of the disease leveled off in 2004 after plunging in 2003, the year after millions of women stopped taking hormones because a big study tied them to higher heart, stroke and breast cancer risks.

Experts said the leveling off shows that the 2003 drop in the cancer rate was real and not a fluke.

Story continues below ↓"

From:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18178827/

Also this BVA decision ( a Remand) is based on the same premise as what you have told us regarding your wife:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp99/files3/9924672.txt

The veteran had considerable disabilities which she claimed as due to hormone therapy inservice.

There are other cases at the BVA ( over 200 I think) in which the word 'hormones' appears and it might pay to take time to access the ones similiar to her situation.

I wonder if this vet succeeded after the remand-at the RO level.

Your wife has a very valid basis for a claim.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • LEArmy93P earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • LtDave earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • HillTopVet earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva went up a rank
      Contributor
    • AFguy1999 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use