I am service connected for right and left 3rd metatarsal fractures which occurred in boot camp and then Marine Combat Training respectively. I got out of the Marines 11/12/95.
Initially in 1996 I received 10% for right and 0% for left. This was based on more complaints of right foot pain. Just to give a little history in 2000 I was service connected for three levels of DDD, post discectomy and laminectomy. The VA examiner in 2000 was asked by the RO if it was possible that my back condition was either direct service connection or secondary to my in service connected fractures of my feet. He stated that he thought it was directly connected and secondary to my SC feet based on the way I would try not to bear weight on the sc fractured metatarsals causing me to re-distribute the weight bearing up to my back.
So I asked for an increase of both feet at the same time I asked for connection of my back in 2000. The back was connected but my feet were denied. I had a hearing with a DRO and explained that my feet were perfect prior to the Marines and after I got out I had Pes cavus, pain all the time, etc. When I was going after my back I had a Podiatrist write a letter stating my aquired Pes cavus possibly caused my back problem. As stated below the VA exaiminer basically agreed. Here is the kicker. When I explained the daignosis of Pes Cavus, unforgiveing feet, etc. to the DRO she stated I would need a VA or civlan Podiatrist to state this was due to my service connected fractures or service time. She denied me an increase based on the fact that all my VA and civilan records since 96 had documented a variety of feet problems none were related to what she called my toe problems. She quoted a May 1997 diagnosis from a private prodiatrist of pes Cavus feet with neuritis secondary to compression from "unforgiving feet". That same doctor also gave me steriod shots for what he was calling possible tarsal tunnel syndrome related to my Pes Cavus feet in 2000 and 2001. She stated this was all not related to my sc feet.
Well now that I am going back through all of medical evidence for my BVA reconsideration for my back and my mind is clearer I realized the VAMC diagnosed aquired Pes Cavus on a 06/14/96 Podiatry appointment. That would be less than a year after service. The exam showed anterior cavus, psuedo-equinus, and the xray showed high metatarsal declination angle, evidence of 3rd metatarsal shaft, mild FF adductus. This was my first visit to VA podiatry to complain about my feet since service.
Now the Pes Cavus, etc. started after the fractures. I have a MEPS exam showing perfectly normal feet before I went in. This case is going back to the BVA. Do I try to say it is all related to my fractures like I have been or go to the RO for service connection of bilateral Pes Cavus?
I am posting back exam 00, feet exam 01, and DRO decision on feet.
"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive the Veterans of earlier wars were treated and appreciated by their nation."
Question
dav_marine72
Question for everyone,
I am service connected for right and left 3rd metatarsal fractures which occurred in boot camp and then Marine Combat Training respectively. I got out of the Marines 11/12/95.
Initially in 1996 I received 10% for right and 0% for left. This was based on more complaints of right foot pain. Just to give a little history in 2000 I was service connected for three levels of DDD, post discectomy and laminectomy. The VA examiner in 2000 was asked by the RO if it was possible that my back condition was either direct service connection or secondary to my in service connected fractures of my feet. He stated that he thought it was directly connected and secondary to my SC feet based on the way I would try not to bear weight on the sc fractured metatarsals causing me to re-distribute the weight bearing up to my back.
So I asked for an increase of both feet at the same time I asked for connection of my back in 2000. The back was connected but my feet were denied. I had a hearing with a DRO and explained that my feet were perfect prior to the Marines and after I got out I had Pes cavus, pain all the time, etc. When I was going after my back I had a Podiatrist write a letter stating my aquired Pes cavus possibly caused my back problem. As stated below the VA exaiminer basically agreed. Here is the kicker. When I explained the daignosis of Pes Cavus, unforgiveing feet, etc. to the DRO she stated I would need a VA or civlan Podiatrist to state this was due to my service connected fractures or service time. She denied me an increase based on the fact that all my VA and civilan records since 96 had documented a variety of feet problems none were related to what she called my toe problems. She quoted a May 1997 diagnosis from a private prodiatrist of pes Cavus feet with neuritis secondary to compression from "unforgiving feet". That same doctor also gave me steriod shots for what he was calling possible tarsal tunnel syndrome related to my Pes Cavus feet in 2000 and 2001. She stated this was all not related to my sc feet.
Well now that I am going back through all of medical evidence for my BVA reconsideration for my back and my mind is clearer I realized the VAMC diagnosed aquired Pes Cavus on a 06/14/96 Podiatry appointment. That would be less than a year after service. The exam showed anterior cavus, psuedo-equinus, and the xray showed high metatarsal declination angle, evidence of 3rd metatarsal shaft, mild FF adductus. This was my first visit to VA podiatry to complain about my feet since service.
Now the Pes Cavus, etc. started after the fractures. I have a MEPS exam showing perfectly normal feet before I went in. This case is going back to the BVA. Do I try to say it is all related to my fractures like I have been or go to the RO for service connection of bilateral Pes Cavus?
I am posting back exam 00, feet exam 01, and DRO decision on feet.
Feet_Post.pdf
DRO_Feet_1.bmp
USMC 1st Battalion 1st Marines 1st Marine Division 91-95
100% P&T
"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive the Veterans of earlier wars were treated and appreciated by their nation."
George Washington
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
1
Popular Days
Oct 13
3
Top Posters For This Question
dav_marine72 2 posts
mobie16r 1 post
Popular Days
Oct 13 2008
3 posts
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now