Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
- 0
Injured Soldier Gets Refund!
Rate this question
Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
Rate this question
Question
Guest Berta
Wounded Soldier to Get Refund
Army Had Demanded Payment for Bloodied Body Armor
By ALLISON BARKER, AP
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (Feb. 8) - A former soldier injured in Iraq is getting a refund after being forced to pay for his missing body armor vest, which medics destroyed because it was soaked with his blood, officials said Wednesday.
Jim MacMillan, AP
First Lt. William "Eddie" Rebrook IV said he was billed for his missing vest because of a clerical error. "I still love the Army, loved being a soldier and loved my unit," he said.
Watch Video: Army Promises to Pay Vet Back
Talk About It: Post Thoughts
First Lt. William "Eddie" Rebrook IV, 25, had to leave the Army with a shrapnel injury to his arm. But before he could be discharged last week, he says he had to scrounge up cash from his buddies to pay $632 for the body armor and other gear he had lost.
Rebrook, who graduated from West Point with honors, said he was billed because a supply officer failed to document that the vest was destroyed as a biohazard. He said a battalion commander refused to sign a waiver for the vest, saying Rebrook would have to supply witness statements to verify the vest was taken from him and burned.
"When that vest was removed from my bleeding body in Iraq, it was no longer my responsibility," Rebrook said Wednesday.
Lt. Col. Scott Bleichwehl, spokesman for the First Cavalry Division at Fort Hood, Texas, said there have been at least 21 similar cases.
Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., questioned Gen. Peter Schoomaker, chief of staff of the Army, on Tuesday during a Senate Armed Services Committee budget hearing, and on Wednesday an Army official said Rebrook would get refunds for the $510 vest and its contents, worth about $50.
Lt. Col. Scott Bleichwehl, spokesman for the First Cavalry Division at Fort Hood, Texas, said there have been at least 21 similar cases. "In all of those cases, not one soldier was held accountable for items lost in combat," he said.
Told of the refund, Rebrook said: "How kind of them."
He blamed the dispute on bureaucracy.
"It's the nature of the beast. ... I still love the Army, loved being a soldier and loved my unit. I'm not going to look back on my service with anything but pride," he said.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
Popular Days
Feb 10
2
Feb 9
1
Top Posters For This Question
robert51 1 post
Popular Days
Feb 10 2006
2 posts
Feb 9 2006
1 post
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts