Last July, we filed with the VARO for an increase in my husband' bilateral tinnitus rating from 10% to 20%, per the CVA's decision in Smith v Nicholson. We haven't heard anything yet other than the canned letter saying "we're still reviewing your claim," etc. The effective date of his claim is sometime in 1998 (can't remember exactly when), so do I have to CUE this in order for it not to be regarded as a new claim? We want the increase, if granted, to be retro'd back. Thanks.
Question
vaf
Last July, we filed with the VARO for an increase in my husband' bilateral tinnitus rating from 10% to 20%, per the CVA's decision in Smith v Nicholson. We haven't heard anything yet other than the canned letter saying "we're still reviewing your claim," etc. The effective date of his claim is sometime in 1998 (can't remember exactly when), so do I have to CUE this in order for it not to be regarded as a new claim? We want the increase, if granted, to be retro'd back. Thanks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
Popular Days
Feb 9
2
Top Posters For This Question
Redd89 1 post
vaf 1 post
Popular Days
Feb 9 2006
2 posts
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts