Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
- 0
Can Govt. Officials Be Personally Sued ?
Rate this question
Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
Rate this question
Question
Magoo_Mr.
.
I saw this last week and do NOT want to make it a political issue, but a ... "TRUTH & LIABILITY ISSUE" ... for some "hazardous materials claims" that have been mentioned on this site
I want to address the issue of .. "Govt' and/or Personal Liability" .. ie .. while EPA Chief is performing in an .. "Official Govt Position" ?????
This primarily has to do with liability during 9-11 and what areas were safe and what the EPA told the people at the time .... but this could possibly apply to other "hazardous material" areas also ?????
If the EPA could make this big of a mistake or lie ... with perhaps 1000s of people after 9-11 (in the civilian world) ... well ... do you really think that DoD via EPA (DoD consults with EPA) is going to be up front with the troops on hazardous materials situations .. that the troops were exposed to & ramifications of those exposures ?????
This poses a VERY serious threat in .. "Believing the Govt" .. with possible future attacks, military hazards, civilian hazards, or storm related damages to hazardous material sites.
... WHAT ARE WE TO BELIEVE IN THE FUTURE ... ?????
Link --> http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story.jsp...649.htm&sc=1110
Text of news article below -->
---------o------------
Judge Slams Ex-EPA Chief Over Sept. 11
By LARRY NEUMEISTER
NEW YORK (AP) - A federal judge blasted former Environmental Protection Agency chief Christine Todd Whitman on Thursday for reassuring New Yorkers soon after the Sept. 11 attacks that it was safe to return to their homes and offices while toxic dust was polluting the neighborhood.
U.S. District Judge Deborah A. Batts refused to grant Whitman immunity against a class-action lawsuit brought in 2004 by residents, students and workers in lower Manhattan and Brooklyn who said they were exposed to hazardous materials from the destruction of the World Trade Center.
``No reasonable person would have thought that telling thousands of people that it was safe to return to lower Manhattan, while knowing that such return could pose long-term health risks and other dire consequences, was conduct sanctioned by our laws,'' the judge said.
She called Whitman's actions ``conscience-shocking,'' saying the EPA chief knew that the collapse of the twin towers released tons of hazardous materials into the air.
Whitman had no comment, according to a spokeswoman. A Justice Department spokesman said the government had no comment.
Spokeswoman Mary Mears said the EPA was reviewing the opinion but was pleased that the court had dismissed two of four civil claims against the agency, including allegations brought under the federal Superfund law.
``The EPA will continue to vigorously defend against the outstanding claims,'' she said.
The judge let the lawsuit proceed against the EPA and Whitman, permitting the plaintiffs to try to prove that the agency and its administrator endangered their health.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages and reimbursement for cleanup costs and asks the court to order that a medical monitoring fund be set up to track the health of those exposed to trade center dust.
In her ruling, Batts noted that the EPA and Whitman said repeatedly - beginning just two days after the attack - that the air appeared safe to breathe. The EPA's internal watchdog later found that the agency, at the urging of White House officials, gave misleading assurances.
Quoting a ruling in an earlier case, the judge said a public official cannot be held personally liable for putting the public in harm's way unless the conduct was so egregious as ``to shock the contemporary conscience.'' Given her role in protecting the health and environment for Americans, Whitman's reassurances after Sept. 11 were ``without question conscience-shocking,'' Batts said.
Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., said in a statement that New Yorkers are still depending on the federal government to describe any ongoing risk from contaminants.
``I continue to believe that the White House owes New Yorkers an explanation,'' she said.
U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat whose district includes the trade center site, said the many people who worked at the site and developed respiratory diseases deserve answers.
``It is my assumption that thousands of people - workers and residents - are being slowly poisoned today because these workplaces and residences were never properly cleaned up,'' Nadler said in a telephone interview.
------------------------o----------End Of Article ----------------o-------------------
... Magoo.. aka .. Bill ... ;)
.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
1
Popular Days
Feb 11
3
Feb 10
1
Top Posters For This Question
Magoo_Mr. 2 posts
Hoppy 1 post
Popular Days
Feb 11 2006
3 posts
Feb 10 2006
1 post
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts