Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Need Arthritis Rating Info

Rate this question


slowhand197

Question

I want to thank all of you for the information you have supplied. It has been a great help for me to try understand this complicated VA stuff. I

I am rated 40% DDD for my back 10% R Hip 10% LHip 10% R Knee. I filed a NOD on my hip claim because the doctor just told my I should have a hip replacement because of the arthritis. He also thinks there is a significant tear in the labrum on my right hip. I told him I can not miss any more work or I will get fired so he agreed to do an arthroscopy and clean up the R hip so recovery would not be too long. I will still need to replace the hip at some point just not now.

My question is can arthritis be rated separately from torn labrum. And they rated me 10% for arthritis L& R hip and knee (no mention of the torn Labrum) and I sent in doctor reports about time lost from work with the DRO request. The way I read the CFR 5003 is

With X-ray evidence of involvement of 2 or more major joints

or 2 or more minor joint groups, with occasional incapacitating

exacerbations 20

I guess they don’t see it that way because the denied the increase.

I have the same issue with my knee 10% for arthritis that includes residuals of meniscal tear. Should these be rated separately? Any advice you guys could give me would be great

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Labrum: In medicine, a ring of fibrocartilage (fibrous cartilage) around the edge of the articular (joint) surface of a bone. The term labrum is used in anatomy to designate a lip, edge, or brim. Plural: labra.

The acetabular labrum, should be rated separately from the arthritis as long as you can either service connect it, or claim it as secondary to the hip arthritis..

For the question on DC 5003, the footnote ONLY applies, if you are NOT already rated for LOM on those specific joints. In other words, if you already have 10% each for knee and hip. then you cannot apply 5003 footnote for those same joints.

Fight the VA as if they are the enemy; for they are!

Erin go Bragh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the VA has rated my hips and Knee by x-ray findings only because my range of motion they say is normal. Does that mean the incapacitating exacerbations will be used?

With X-ray evidence of involvement of 2 or more major joints

or 2 or more minor joint groups, with occasional incapacitating

exacerbations 20

There is another potential problem with the incapacitating episodes. My doctor wrights notes that I should be out of work for a certain amount of time but in another one of my claims the VA said those letters were not valid. I guess because he did not put “stay in bed “like what the hell else can I do if I can’t work.

The knee and one of my hips also have tears one has been fixed and one I get operated on next week. Can arthritis be rated separately from tears as long as the rating is not for LOM they are different problems

The more I reed about this stuff the more confused I get thanks for the help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

VAs definition of incapacitating episodes is "requiring Doctor ordered bed-rest".

As I stated in my first reply, look under muscle codes for rating regarding 'tears', which are different than arthritis.

Fight the VA as if they are the enemy; for they are!

Erin go Bragh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use