Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
  
 Read Disability Claims Articles 
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Sickened By Service: The Proving Ground

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_14182244

Sickened by Service: The Proving Ground

Vets say toxic tests sickened them; government says prove it

West desert > Army says it used 'voluntary human subjects,' but ill man says

'I was private first class I did anything they told me to do.'

By Matthew D. LaPlante

The Salt Lake Tribune

Salt Lake Tribune

Updated:01/17/2010 11:12:02 PM MST

http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/medi.../20050325_03204

6_PrintLogo.gif

http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/medi.../20050325_03351

4_PrintURL.gif

_____

Editor's note: Third in a three-part series.

http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_14182244

Vets say toxic tests sickened them; government says prove it

Even those who know the area best won't step far off the narrow, muddy road

that runs through the center of the desolate toxic dump at Utah's Deseret

Chemical Depot.

It's been more than 30 years since the U.S. Army used this vast scrubland,

known as the East Demilitarization Area, to dispose of a deadly arsenal of

chemical and conventional munitions -- but the military still hasn't figured

out how to clean up its mess.

The Defense Department does acknowledge the disaster, just as it has

belatedly admitted having tested a gamut of chemical and biological weapons

on military members in Utah's vast west desert during the Cold War. But the

U.S. government insists that the tests have contributed to long-term

illnesses in only a handful of exposed service members. And that has led the

Department of Veterans Affairs to deny almost all claims for care and

compensation made by those who believe they got sick as a result of the

tests.

Although the Cold War was fought mainly by proxy and politicians, it was not

without its casualties: Many died while waiting on the military to so much

as acknowledge its secret programs.

Now, Dwight Bunn fears he might also slip away before the government takes

responsibility for its actions.

The former soldier is sick. And he wants to know why.

--

'Don't worry, this stuff won't hurt you.' >Bunn was 21 years old when he

arrived at Dugway Proving Ground, just over the snow-dusted hills from the

Deseret demilitarization dump, in Tooele County. The official mission of his

unit, the 45th Chemical Company, was to create smoke screens for infantry

assaults. But in the early 1960s, at the height of the Cold War, the Army

had other uses for the group.

Among the company's secretive duties: Helping to dispose of the carcasses of

animals used in chemical weapons tests.

Starting in the 1940s and continuing through the 1970s, the Army tested and

disposed of thousands of tons of chemical and biological agents in sparsely

populated Utah, including munitions loaded with sarin, VX, mustard, tabun

and various hallucinogens.

Bunn, whose tour of duty in Utah began as the U.S. was beginning to build up

its forces in Vietnam, also believes members of his unit were exposed to

Agent Orange. "They told us, 'Don't worry, this stuff won't hurt you. It's a

defoliant and so it will kill the trees, but you'll be fine," he said.

Bunn said military officials have told him they can find no record of Utah

tests involving the toxic herbicide, which has been linked to dozens of

medical conditions.

But for the Washington state man, the government's denials are less than

convincing. After all, the military spent years disavowing the tests

altogether. The denials ended in the late 1990s, but the government has

offered medical care and compensation only to those who can establish, by a

preponderance of evidence, their illnesses were the result of exposure.

As of 2008, just 39 of 614 benefit claims filed by veterans in relation to

tests nationwide had been approved.

Bunn, who suffers from restrictive lung disease, has asked the VA for care

and compensation for his condition, in which tissue surrounding the lungs

hardens and makes it difficult to exhale.

But the 65-year-old veteran's claim has been denied. And he's infuriated by

a government that kept the program secret for decades, and now expects him

and others to be able to offer proof that the tests made them sick.

"I've been exposed to a hell of a lot of stuff," he said. "Can I say

definitively what did this to me? No I can't. But I've never lied about it.

The military -- it conducted tests on humans and didn't acknowledge it.

That's not right."

--

'Blow it up and burn it.' > Long rows of wooden pallets, stacked with bomb

casings and ragged pieces of shrapnel, memorialize the Army's last attempt

to clean up the Deseret demilitarization dump. The inefficient bomb-by-bomb

effort was abandoned in the 1980s when military leaders realized it was too

dangerous to continue.

"They just walked away," said Troy Johnson, Deseret's environmental program

manager.

It's hard to understand why they even started. Just to the south of

Deseret's colossal, modern weapons incinerator, the charred shells of nearly

60,000 mortars form an artificial bluff hundreds of feet across. Some of the

bombs are believed to be filled with the hardened remnants of mustard agent.

Not far away, ditches the size of swimming pools are filled with paint cans,

fire extinguishers, oil drums, tear gas canisters and cluster bombs.

Unexploded ordnance litters the ground.

When a lightning fire blazed through Deseret in 1999, explosions sent white

smoke into the air as long-discarded phosphorus grenades were ignited. In

some areas, the soil has a green hue; military environmental experts believe

that's where napalm was dumped.

The toxic disaster area covers thousands of acres.

"It was perfectly acceptable, back then, to just take this stuff out here,

blow it up and burn it," Johnson said. "Today, when we discard of these

weapons, we have to be 99.999 -- and then some more nines -- percent clean.

Back then, out here, they simply lit a match."

--

'You're supposed to be obedient' >David Davidson can't say definitively that

he was sickened by his exposure to mass destruction munitions at Dugway --

but he can't say he wasn't either.

"The question is: Who knows?" said Davidson, who suffers from several types

of cancer, kidney failure and heart disease and undergoes 12 hours of

dialysis each week. "All I know is that I have a list of things wrong with

me, but I've never been given a list of the things I was exposed to."

The VA has denied the 73-year-old veteran's requests for care.

The Army asserts it tested biological and chemical agents on "volunteer

human subjects." But Davidson -- who arrived at Dugway in 1961 -- takes

issue with the notion that the tests were in any way voluntary.

"I was a PFC -- a private first class," Davidson said. "You know what that

means? That means I did anything they told me to do."

Once, Davidson recalled, he and other soldiers were packed into the back of

an M35 cargo truck and driven into the desert, where a grid had been set up

with stakes and string. "They stood us all out there, each at a different

distance from where they were going to set off an explosion and told us to

stick it out as the gas went off. Then we were supposed to come back and

tell them how it affected us."

Davidson doesn't know what the gas was, but it created "a big fog" and sent

him to his knees, gasping for breath.

"It's interesting that they would do such a thing," he said. "But when

you're in the military, you're supposed to be obedient, and I did what I was

told."

--

'They said this never happened.' > For decades, military leaders remained

silent about "Project 112," a slew of tests overseen by the Army's Deseret

Test Center in Salt Lake City. Beginning in the 1960s, the program tested

chemical and biological agents, including VX, sarin and e. Coli, on

unknowing military personnel.

When the tests were finally acknowledged, the Defense Department agreed to

help the VA track down those who were exposed. But in a report issued in

2008, the General Accountability Office scolded the military for its

lackluster effort.

According to the report, the military arbitrarily ended its attempts to find

victims in 2003 -- even as some veteran advocates were finding hundreds of

others whose illnesses might have been caused or aggravated by their

exposure.

The GAO report didn't surprise Douglas Rosinski, a Washington, D.C.,

attorney who represented a group of veterans that helped force an end to

years of Pentagon silence about the tests.

"For 40 years, they said this never happened," Rosinski said. "I would be

surprised if the government was still being anything other than absolutely

reluctant."

Michael Kilpatrick, director of strategic communications for the Military

Health System, said a renewed effort to locate service members exposed to

chemical and biological testing will likely conclude in 2011.

More than 60 years after the testing began, Kilpatrick said, the government

is still investigating "what exposures each individual may have had and to

evaluate each individual's current health."

In the meantime, he said, "these individuals are eligible for an evaluation

by the VA."

And, for most, that's all they'll get.

Meanwhile, veterans who were exposed to the tests are fading into history.

Bunn, the former soldier who was assigned to pick up animal carcasses, knows

of just one other man from his unit who is still alive. "And the last time I

spoke with him, he was having trouble remembering much about what happened

out there."

Ultimately, Bunn said, the human evidence of the tests will be gone. "All

that will be left is the desert we used to stomp around in," he said.

<mailto:mlaplante@sltrib.com> mlaplante@sltrib.com

<http://blogs.sltrib.com/military> blogs.sltrib.com/military

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The Edgewood Arsenal "test vets" did file a lawsuit against the DOD, Army and the CIA even though we did "volunteer" they never told us the truth, nor did we ever give "informed consent" and there is a major difference between consent and informed consent the DOJ lawyers have thrown everything except a kitchen sink at our lawyers trying to get the Judge to throw the case out still standing should either go to court or be settled soon.....all of the veterans exposed to chemicals and drugs should be covered under the lawsuit as guinea pigs.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use