At first when I found out I was denied A&A my service officer told me that it was based on not meeting the criteria. Considering that the VA examiner concluded I needed 24/7 supervision from my wife based on the dangers of my environment I thought this reason a little odd. Today I recieved the decision letter and all I can say is I am in shock. I have recieved some pretty crazy denials before but this takes the cake. I'll highlight the insanity:
It's being concluded that I have active service connected and non-service connected aliments I am being treated for. Now other than GERD this is a little confusing to me. The only possiblity they can be using is my feet problems. The last page attached in this scan has a diagnosis from a civilan podiatrist I saw last year. Just some qucik background on the feet. I broke my right foot in boot camp and my left foot in Marine Combat Training. I had no idea why this happens because I never had any issues with my feet prior to service. My meps physical also did not include any feet disorders. So when I get discharged in 95 I filed for service connections for my feet. I get connected at 10% for my right and 0% for my left. Less than a year after I was out I was diagnosed by VA podiatry with Pes Cavus (high arch feet) and ankle equinus. Over the years these diagnoses would go from mild to severe. I was also diagnosed with nerve entrapment on the tops of my feet based on the in service injuries. I guess since my feet were fine prior to going to the USMC I just assumed all these aliments would be a part of my service connections stated residuals of right and left foot injuries. Anyway in 1997 I started to get leg and back pains. By 2000 they were severe and I had my first back surgery. I asked for service connection at that time for my back. I had a podiatrist write a letter saying it was possible that my pes cavus rigid feet caused my back problems from all the humping and running in the Corps. My surgeon also wrote a letter saying it was possible the training in the Marines caused my back to go out. Since I had no history of back issues prior to service and then within 1 1/2 after getting discharged my L3-S1 were rotted and I was told my back looked like a man who had worked hard labor his whole life and was 65 yr old. SO the VA examiner reports that he believes my back was injured directly and seocndary from my feet based on the way I walk. He stated my gait included me shifting my weight off of the third metatarsals which were the ones I fractured. They ended up giving me direct service connection.
Last but not least in 2009 I had a low level back exam done that the VA had never done even though it's in their training manual on IVDS. The civilan dr who examined me measured my muscle groups in my lower extremities and found they were unsymmetrical. He opted I had muscle wasting and atrophy and tied each muscle group back to one of 3 discs taken out of my back. He stated this exam was concurrent with a similar exam he gave me in 2006. Now out of somewhere and I think it's the equinus the VA is stating I have a neurological condition in my legs that is not service connected. I was service connected in 2008 back to 2002 for lower extremity weakness based on straight leg raises. Now to combat this so called non-service connected injures which they don't really tell me about other than the legs I am going to go back to the podiatrist with all my records and ask for a nexus letter to connect Pes Cavus and ankle equinus to my feet or service. FYI Pes Cavus causes pressure on the metatarsal heads hence why I fractures 1 in each foot. Ankle equinus is directly connected to Pes Cavus as well. I probably had Pes Cavus prior to service but I had no issues and even if I did there is no doubt service aggravated it. I also had xrays at the VA in 2009 and they found arthitis in each foot in the 3rd metatarsal area.
Next wacked statement. They state I am not service connected for a right knee, left ankle sprain, fracture left foot, and the neurological legs. I already addressed the legs. As far as right knee, I have no problems with my right knee. As far as left ankle sprain goes the VA podiatrist asked me if I had ankle sprains during service and over the years based on my feet. I said yes but they have no functional impairment soooooooo what the hell? Then there is the fracture left foot. LOL this one kills me. I am service connected for a fracture of the left foot.
Once again they finally deny me based on having non-service connections.
So glad I need to do their jobs for them. Hopefully I won't die from the stress so when I win these claims my family will be able to enjoy some of the extra money.
Question
dav_marine72
At first when I found out I was denied A&A my service officer told me that it was based on not meeting the criteria. Considering that the VA examiner concluded I needed 24/7 supervision from my wife based on the dangers of my environment I thought this reason a little odd. Today I recieved the decision letter and all I can say is I am in shock. I have recieved some pretty crazy denials before but this takes the cake. I'll highlight the insanity:
It's being concluded that I have active service connected and non-service connected aliments I am being treated for. Now other than GERD this is a little confusing to me. The only possiblity they can be using is my feet problems. The last page attached in this scan has a diagnosis from a civilan podiatrist I saw last year. Just some qucik background on the feet. I broke my right foot in boot camp and my left foot in Marine Combat Training. I had no idea why this happens because I never had any issues with my feet prior to service. My meps physical also did not include any feet disorders. So when I get discharged in 95 I filed for service connections for my feet. I get connected at 10% for my right and 0% for my left. Less than a year after I was out I was diagnosed by VA podiatry with Pes Cavus (high arch feet) and ankle equinus. Over the years these diagnoses would go from mild to severe. I was also diagnosed with nerve entrapment on the tops of my feet based on the in service injuries. I guess since my feet were fine prior to going to the USMC I just assumed all these aliments would be a part of my service connections stated residuals of right and left foot injuries. Anyway in 1997 I started to get leg and back pains. By 2000 they were severe and I had my first back surgery. I asked for service connection at that time for my back. I had a podiatrist write a letter saying it was possible that my pes cavus rigid feet caused my back problems from all the humping and running in the Corps. My surgeon also wrote a letter saying it was possible the training in the Marines caused my back to go out. Since I had no history of back issues prior to service and then within 1 1/2 after getting discharged my L3-S1 were rotted and I was told my back looked like a man who had worked hard labor his whole life and was 65 yr old. SO the VA examiner reports that he believes my back was injured directly and seocndary from my feet based on the way I walk. He stated my gait included me shifting my weight off of the third metatarsals which were the ones I fractured. They ended up giving me direct service connection.
Last but not least in 2009 I had a low level back exam done that the VA had never done even though it's in their training manual on IVDS. The civilan dr who examined me measured my muscle groups in my lower extremities and found they were unsymmetrical. He opted I had muscle wasting and atrophy and tied each muscle group back to one of 3 discs taken out of my back. He stated this exam was concurrent with a similar exam he gave me in 2006. Now out of somewhere and I think it's the equinus the VA is stating I have a neurological condition in my legs that is not service connected. I was service connected in 2008 back to 2002 for lower extremity weakness based on straight leg raises. Now to combat this so called non-service connected injures which they don't really tell me about other than the legs I am going to go back to the podiatrist with all my records and ask for a nexus letter to connect Pes Cavus and ankle equinus to my feet or service. FYI Pes Cavus causes pressure on the metatarsal heads hence why I fractures 1 in each foot. Ankle equinus is directly connected to Pes Cavus as well. I probably had Pes Cavus prior to service but I had no issues and even if I did there is no doubt service aggravated it. I also had xrays at the VA in 2009 and they found arthitis in each foot in the 3rd metatarsal area.
Next wacked statement. They state I am not service connected for a right knee, left ankle sprain, fracture left foot, and the neurological legs. I already addressed the legs. As far as right knee, I have no problems with my right knee. As far as left ankle sprain goes the VA podiatrist asked me if I had ankle sprains during service and over the years based on my feet. I said yes but they have no functional impairment soooooooo what the hell? Then there is the fracture left foot. LOL this one kills me. I am service connected for a fracture of the left foot.
They also state that I do not meet the schedular requirment for consideration of this benefit, as you are not rated service connected disabled at 100%. I know these pain killers sometimes put me in lala land but as I recall as of March 2009 I am 80% schedular and TDIU 100%. Are they on crack? Then to make it even worse you don't even need to be 100% to be considered for A&A. Under the Manual M21-1MR, Part IV, subpart ii, 2.H.44© 8.13b, if a disability is rated less than 100% but a recent examination shows that the disability is so severe as to demonstrate a need for regular A&A, the claim should be submitted to the VA central office for an advisory opinion on whether to grant A&A. Lets not forgot Bradley vs Peake and or VA Gen. Coun. Prec. 66-91 (Aug. 15, 1991) and Manual M21-1MR part IV, subpart ii.2.H(a) which allows 38 CFR 4.16 (TDIU) to be used as a basis for entitlement to SMC.
Once again they finally deny me based on having non-service connections.
So glad I need to do their jobs for them. Hopefully I won't die from the stress so when I win these claims my family will be able to enjoy some of the extra money.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
10
5
2
1
Popular Days
May 28
12
May 29
6
May 30
3
Top Posters For This Question
dav_marine72 10 posts
windy city 5 posts
Pete53 2 posts
Testvet 1 post
Popular Days
May 28 2010
12 posts
May 29 2010
6 posts
May 30 2010
3 posts
Posted Images
20 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now