Jump to content
Using an Ad Blocker? Consider adding HadIt.com as an exception. Hadit.com is funded through advertising, ad free memberships, contributions and out of pocket. ×
  • 0

Canadian Government Spends $8 Million To Fight Agent Orange Claims


pacmanx1

Question

CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SPENDS $8 MILLION TO FIGHT AGENT ORANGE CLAIMS

Documents recently tabled in Parliament show four departments have been involved in battling the class-action suit regarding AO exposure at Base Gagetown.

NOTE from Larry Scott, VA Watchdog dot Org ... It seems our Canadian Brother and Sister veterans are fighting the same battle that U.S. veterans of the Vietnam War are fighting.

For complete background on Agent Orange use at Base Gagetown, use our search engine ... here ...

http://www.yourvaben...gagetown&op=and

-------------------------

Legal costs to fight Agent Orange case near $8 million

By Kathryn May, The Ottawa Citizen

http://www.vancouversun.com/life/Legal+costs+fight+Ag

ent+Orange+case+near+million/3188219/story.html

OTTAWA The Harper government has spent nearly $8 million fighting veterans and their families seeking compensation for exposure to the defoliant Agent Orange at Canadian Forces Base Gagetown in New Brunswick.

Documents recently tabled in Parliament show four departments have been involved in battling the class-action suit, with the Justice Department spending the most at $5.8 million, followed by another $1.5 million spent by National Defense. Health Canada and Veterans Affairs have paid about $445,000.

Liberal Senator Percy Downe, who requested the tab, said $7.8 million in legal fees is "beyond the pale" especially when veterans exposed to Agent Orange are being denied what's owed to them.

The tally includes outside legal fees and departmental costs incurred between July 2005 and March 2010.

"These surviving veterans and their families have waited long enough it's time to stop paying lawyers and start paying our veterans the debt to which they are owed."

Downe said veterans and civilians were forced into a lawsuit after the Harper government failed to honor a promise to compensate anyone affected by the spraying of the powerful defoliant on the base between 1956 and 1984.

The government introduced a $96-million plan, but critics say it has restrictions that aim to limit the numbers who qualify for compensation and the government's liability.

From:

http://www.vawatchdog.org/printpage.php

Edited by pacmanx1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Ads

  • Ads

  • Ads

  • Our picks

  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • How to get your questions answered...

    question-001.jpeg

    All VA Claims questions should be posted on our forums. Read the forums without registering, to post you must register it’s free. Register for a free account.

    Tips on posting on the forums.

    1. Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ or “VA med center won’t schedule my surgery” instead of ‘I have a question’.
    2. Knowledgable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title. I don’t read all posts every login and will gravitate towards those I have more info on.
    3. Use paragraphs instead of one huge, rambling introduction or story. Again – You want to make it easy for others to help. If your question is buried in a monster paragraph there are fewer who will investigate to dig it out.

    Leading to:

    Post clear questions and then give background info on them.

    Examples:

    • A. I was previously denied for apnea – Should I refile a claim?
      • was diagnosed with apnea in service and received a CPAP machine but claim was denied in 2008. Should I refile?
    • B. I may have PTSD- how can I be sure?
      • I was involved in traumatic incident on base in 1974 and have had nightmares ever since, but I did not go to mental health while enlisted. How can I get help?

    This gives members a starting point to ask clarifying questions like “Can you post the Reasons for Denial from your claim?” etc.

    Note:

    Your firsts posts on the board may be delayed before they show up, as they are reviewed, this process does not take long and the review requirement will be removed usually by the 6th post, though we reserve the right to keep anyone on moderator preview.

    This process allows us to remove spam and other junk posts before they hit the board. We want to keep the focus on VA Claims and this helps us do that.

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines