Jump to content
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  •  ad-free-subscription-002.jpeg     fund-the-site.jpg

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Draggin'

Nod Review And Medical Records

Question

OK so when you file a NOD and a De Novo review is performed (and this is verified in a letter by VA, not assumed)...does the reviewer NOT pull up your current VA medical records?

There are things that they say I have never complained about or sought treatment for that I in fact have (and have prescriptions for, etc.) over the last few months-year. My letter says the De Novo Review was performed 4-8-2011. Are they only looking at what was medical information was there when the original claim was made? Do they pull current medical files? Try to not laugh out loud, I know I'm probably expecting too much.

Everything in my NOD was denied...much of it based on nothing being in the "available medical records". We sent no evidence in along with the NOD. We did not get an interview with the De Novo reviewer as requested. We were asked for nothing else. In short we were told in the letter that we now have to file an appeal. Now what? Is this how it normally goes?

Draggin'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

OH,

I see now that they only used my records up until Sep, 2009.

Why is that?

Also I see that the letter is an SOC - Statement of the Case - I've only researched this lightly but what I saw about SOC did not look promising.

Draggin'

Edited by Draggin'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

OK so when you file a NOD and a De Novo review is performed (and this is verified in a letter by VA, not assumed)...does the reviewer NOT pull up your current VA medical records?

Draggin - In a De Novo Review, no the DRO does not go out of their way to see if you have additional medical evidence

to consider, unless YOU SUBMIT IT TO THEM OR REQUEST THEY GET IT AND TELL THEM WHERE AND THE DATES, they wouldn't

even know it existed.

There are things that they say I have never complained about or sought treatment for that I in fact have (and have prescriptions for, etc.) over the last few months-year. My letter says the De Novo Review was performed 4-8-2011. Are they only looking at what was medical information was there when the original claim was made? Do they pull current medical files? Try to not laugh out loud, I know I'm probably expecting too much.

Draggin - sorry but I can't help myself - ha, ha , ha , ha .

Everything in my NOD was denied...much of it based on nothing being in the "available medical records". We sent no evidence in along with the NOD. We did not get an interview with the De Novo reviewer as requested.

Draggin - now you might have a leg to stand on here - if a request for a Hearing with the DRO was made in writing and it was not provided,

they HAVE to provide the Hearing as requested. I do not know nor have ever heard anything pertaining to "an interview with the De Novo reviewer".

If you have a VSO, maybe that's something your VSO TRIED to cook up.

We were asked for nothing else. In short we were told in the letter that we now have to file an appeal. Now what? Is this how it normally goes?

Draggin - I would meticulously check my records to verify if a DRO Hearing was requested in writing, if it was and didn't happen

this is what I would hang my hat on to keep it at the RO level for adjudication.

Now if you have a VSO, they may have spoken with the DRO who was doing the De Novo Review - and your VSO has you'r prior consent

to handle all issues of your claim so you might be screwed on this.

Hopefully other's will chime in.

JMHO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, you sure do have to be on your toes to keep up with the 6th graders at the RO, don't cha? Hahahaha

Draggin'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What stinks is that they said they didn't get the NOD in time, showed they didn't have it. (Of course) We had the proof it was submitted in time. We got a new veterans service officer, my wife said she wanted the help. They got it re-submitted for us but did nothing else. No reminder about supplying medical records. I do realize that this information is here and we probably should have caught that. I'm not complaining as much as I'm pointing out that it's better to stay on top of these things for yourself-a VSO may or may not remind you of such things.

It is becoming discouraging but we're going to keep working on this appeal. On the bright side, we still have a PTSD claim to appeal-this is just the beginning. Wait, is that a bright side?

Draggin'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • I filed for my mitral valve regurgitation heart disease secondary to a service-connected condition on 7-30-18. It was granted on 8-30-18. Since I filed for this heart valve issue and was awarded, can I still file for hypertension ? I have been seeing comments that you should file for hypertension first and file for heart disease as a secondary. Can I file for hypertension as a secondary to my heart disease ? I am alittle confused on this matter.

      Dan
    • How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      How to Change the Theme - Look and Colors
      • 5 replies
    • For Calculating Retro

      VA Disability Compensation Rates 2012 | 2011 | 2010-2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999

      Prior to 1999 check here https://www.hadit.com/va-disability-compensation-rates-historic-for-retro-calculation/
      • 0 replies
    • I am a 100% disabled veteran, At first I was super excited to find out I am getting retro pay for back benefits to 2006. But that was over 2 months ago. I been waiting and waiting and calling to ask them wheres my back pay. They first told me "one month" than I call again. The guy started reading a script of basically "we are malingering on paying you" type crap. I was wondering if there is any number I can call besides that 800-827-1000 number to inquire about my status. I don't know why its taken so long when there is specific information telling them from the judge that VA owes. 

      There was a remanded to see if I was eligible for IU (I get it now since 2014 im actually 90% with 10 of that been IU). I been on SS since 2004. Can Someone help me out? Thank you
      • 6 replies
    • You might have a 38 CFR 3.156 situation-

      meaning the VA might have considered your claim in 95/96 as "not well grounded" and failed to even get your STRs.Or they did get your STRs but never considered the specific entry you cited here.

      Lots of discussion under a search, of 38 CFR. 3.156 (a)(b) (c) ---here is a winner:

      https://community.hadit.com/topic/52994-cue-in-failing-to-apply-the-provisions-of-38-cfr-§-3156c-for-effective-date/

      o

       
        • Thanks
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines