Moderator pacmanx1 Posted June 21, 2011 Moderator Share Posted June 21, 2011 http://www.vba.va.go...omp01b.htm#BM01 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hedgey Posted August 13, 2012 Share Posted August 13, 2012 Thump me if I'm being stupid, 'cuz I probably am, but when I look at the SMC table, say, S, for with spouse, without children, I see this number: $3,255. My question: is the the total compensation, or is that in addition to the disability compensation being paid for 100% Told you it was stupid... but I can't see straight anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvretiredvet Posted August 14, 2012 Share Posted August 14, 2012 All SMC (with the exception of SMC-k) is the 'total compensation' rather than in addition to. Thump me if I'm being stupid, 'cuz I probably am, but when I look at the SMC table, say, S, for with spouse, without children, I see this number: $3,255. My question: is the the total compensation, or is that in addition to the disability compensation being paid for 100% Told you it was stupid... but I can't see straight anymore. All SMC (with the exception of SMC-k) is the 'total compensation' rather than in addition to. Thump me if I'm being stupid, 'cuz I probably am, but when I look at the SMC table, say, S, for with spouse, without children, I see this number: $3,255. My question: is the the total compensation, or is that in addition to the disability compensation being paid for 100% Told you it was stupid... but I can't see straight anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceturkee Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 All SMC (with the exception of SMC-k) is the 'total compensation' rather than in addition to. All SMC (with the exception of SMC-k) is the 'total compensation' rather than in addition to. are you positive because i have read it was addition in most categories. thanks, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvretiredvet Posted August 16, 2012 Share Posted August 16, 2012 are you positive Yes, I am positive because i have read it was addition in most categories. And this reading is from a reputable source? Here is my source, the law for Special Monthly Compensation at 38 USC 1114 http://us-code.vlex....sation-19233414 . The basic verbiage (and dollar amounts) were penned prior to 2002, and do not reflect subsequent COLAs. thanks, You're welcome. are you positive because i have read it was addition in most categories. thanks, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceturkee Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 are you positive Yes, I am positive because i have read it was addition in most categories. And this reading is from a reputable source? Here is my source, the law for Special Monthly Compensation at 38 USC 1114 http://us-code.vlex....sation-19233414 . The basic verbiage (and dollar amounts) were penned prior to 2002, and do not reflect subsequent COLAs. thanks, You're welcome. i have read it in this forum. that's why i asked. thanks for the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now