mrp Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 I initially chose to have a Travel Board hearing for my appeal. I received letter asking if I wanted to choose other options which might be quicker: Video-conference, or live hearing in Washington. Any advice as to which option is the best choice, and if it would be significantly sooner. The RO is also very far, so going to Washington could be an option. Does a live hearing offer advantage over a videoconference ? Will waiting for Travel hearing be significantly longer, as the VA implies ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuaymasJim Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 I was assisting a veteran from TX with his BVA appeal. He had waited almost 1500 days for an in-person BVA traveling board hearing. We took an unorthodox approach and contacted BVA directly. Within a very short time, a hearing had been scheduled in DC (VACO), we got a full and complete copy of the veteran's C-File from BVA in 22 days, the hearing was held despite hurricane and earthquake, a decision was reached in less than a month granting SC back to 2002, the claim was returned to Houston RO for rating which took only THREE WEEKS. Live people at the BVA took calls, answered questions, and guided us step by step through the process. There did not appear to be any rush or pressure to get the hearing over. At least in Houston RO, the traveling board only happens twice a year. Hearing are held in Washington, DC every day. There does not seem to be any sizable backlog. All in all, it was the most positive and professional interaction I have ever had with the VA in 41 years! I am a strong believer in in-person hearings. They put a human face on a claim. Your claim should be distilled down to no more than 4 or 5 very distinct issues. Have copies of all of the evidence for the 4-5 issues with you to hand the judge. Limit your presentation to those issues. This would not be the place to go into a diatribe on how badly the VA has treated you or how much you need the money-just the issues and evidence you feel prove your claim--nothing more. There are a couple of affordable motels reasonably close to the Central Office in the $90-100 per night range. Taxis are cheap in Washington. I for one, strongly recommend an in-person hearing in Washington, DC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrp Posted December 10, 2011 Author Share Posted December 10, 2011 Thanks for the reply, I think you convinced me to choose a live hearing in DC. I hope my claim does not lose it's place in line if I change the choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scscrewed Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 I think a live hearing humanizes the veteran more. They can actually see the person and feel empathy. A grainy tv screen doesn't offer the same ability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrp Posted December 10, 2011 Author Share Posted December 10, 2011 does anyone know average wait time comparisons between them--- that is, HOW much longer will I be waiting to get a live hearing (Travel) at the RO versus at Wash DC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlie Posted December 11, 2011 Share Posted December 11, 2011 does anyone know average wait time comparisons between them--- that is, HOW much longer will I be waiting to get a live hearing (Travel) at the RO versus at Wash DC You will most likely save about 18 months time wise, if you are willing to travel at your own expense and have the hearing before a judge in DC. JMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrp Posted December 11, 2011 Author Share Posted December 11, 2011 what about the difference between Wash DC and a Videoconference at the RO---- would Wash DC be a lot sooner than that ? ( Thanks for helping me decide) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
mrp
I initially chose to have a Travel Board hearing for my appeal.
I received letter asking if I wanted to choose other options which might be quicker:
Video-conference, or live hearing in Washington.
Any advice as to which option is the best choice, and if it would be significantly sooner.
The RO is also very far, so going to Washington could be an option.
Does a live hearing offer advantage over a videoconference ?
Will waiting for Travel hearing be significantly longer, as the VA implies ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
2
2
1
Popular Days
Dec 10
5
Dec 11
3
Dec 12
1
Dec 28
1
Top Posters For This Question
mrp 4 posts
carlie 2 posts
GuaymasJim 2 posts
scscrewed 1 post
Popular Days
Dec 10 2011
5 posts
Dec 11 2011
3 posts
Dec 12 2011
1 post
Dec 28 2011
1 post
9 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now