Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sign in to follow this  

Fayetteville misdiagnosis Snafu

Recommended Posts


"The VA Town Hall meeting will be on Sunday, July 9 at 11 a.m., and it will be located at the Veterans Health Care System of the Ozarks,  according to Wanda Shull, the public affairs officer with the VA. 

"The town hall is being held with the goal of ensuring Veterans, their families, and beneficiaries are provided with the most current information; and have their concerns addressed by senior VHSO officials. VHSO will also be joined by representatives from the Veterans Benefits Administration to help answer any related benefits questions Veterans may have," the news release states."


I hope they are prepared for a crowd.

Ben Krause finally got my email on it- it is at his site today-

I got one Google alert on this on the 18th of June and immediately contacted the law firm- now it is growing all over the net, and on TV and radio in Arkansas and Missouri, and the NY Times.

VA saves lives everyday- but no VA patient should keep their head in the sand if they think something is wrong with their VA health care.

My husband's  1994 1151  claim focused on what he felt was a lack of proper PTSD treatment.The treatment got better whe I raised hell- but he ended his 1151 with the statement that since his PTSD might have been malpracticed on, his stroke definitely was, ( we thought for only 3 weeks but it was over 2 years),and added they might have been misdiagnosing heart disease as well and could cause his death, but   then when Pres Clinton said the VA health care system was the best Gov health care system in the world- Rod turned to me and said 'maybe I should withdraw my 1151 claim'- but I reminded him what would Clinton kow about the real VA.

When he died I had to become the 1151 claimant. He was right-they misdiagnosed 4 conditions, 2 were AOs, and their last award to me under 1151 was in 2015.

The  WH hot line for vets filed a complaint for me- the complaint was why hasn't VA Central Office given out a press release yet on Fayetteville?

Some of those 20,000 vets sure might have moved elsewhere since 2005- and maybe given their RO their forwarding adsdress but maybe not to the Fayetteville VAMC.

The VA allowed this pathologist back on the job after he was in some sort of recovery program, and he was found to be impaired at work again-

VA is liable for his actions. There are only 2 questionable deaths so far, and 7 confirmed misdiagnosed veterans.





Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have received that terrible letter from VA advising you that a Fayetteille pathologist might have interpreted your lab work wrong, and caused you to have been misdiagnosed ,  Senator Boozman would like to here from you:

If you have a copy of  your VA medical records, I can give you contact info for a Fayetteville malpractice law firm.
Otherwise you can use this form to get them:

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I told lawyer who had received calls from vets on this , when the first story broke, that this will definitely get worse.

And it did.This past Monday.

"FAYETTEVILLE (KFSM) — A review of cases of a former pathologist who was found to be impaired have showed 1,119 errors so far, resulting in 11 institutional disclosures and three veterans who have died.


The information was disclosed at a town hall meeting at the VA Medical Center in Fayetteville on Monday morning.

Institutional disclosures” refers to adverse events that occurred during care that resulted in death or serious injury.

Their deaths could possibly be a result of the diagnosis by this former doctor,” said Dr. Kelvin L. Parks, interim director of the VA Medial Center, referring to former Veterans Health Care System of the Ozarks pathologist, Dr. Robert Morris Levy, who was found to be “impaired” on March 22, 2016. The pathologist was immediately removed from clinical care.

Levy was fired in April following a DUI arrest in Oct. 2017 which was ultimately dismissed. Levy denied being impaired while on duty.

Following his firing, officials with the VA Medical Center in Fayetteville and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs announced an investigation in more than 33,000 of Levy’s cases, which affect about 20,OOO

The case reviews are expected to take until the end of the year."



I have two comments on what is stated above:

"resulting in 11 institutional disclosures" and

Institutional disclosures” refers to adverse events that occurred during care that resulted in death or serious injury."

What that means is that 11 incident reports that VA has (done by some VA employee - nurse, doctor) at time of the incident which might or might not been revealed to the veteran or their family members if the veteran died, or if the veteran could have gotten at that point enough care to sustain their life. Some vets or their survivors, if made award of these incident reports probably think VA will compensate them n the basis of those 11 reports. However, every single case of malpractice here has to be filed for as under Section 1151, and/or FTCA.

The Public Affairs person at these Town Hall Meetings- this was the second one, told me the VA was definitely advising any vet or their survivors who had been malpractced on, of both Section 1151 and/or FTCA. I want to believe that......

Of the 33,000 cases, I also believe that accounts for over 5 thousand deaths that are being or will be investigated.Maybe be more than VA knows so far.

"1,119 errors so far"- Medical errors by one VA pathologist!

I strongly believe that our former Radio show tech, Mike Sasser  aka Stretch, was one of the wrongfully dead veterans and his spouse has filed FTCA already.

This is an OUTRAGE!!!!!!! Director Parks didn't want this to become National News. I called the WH Hot Line and filed a complaint because I dont even think thePresident or Sec Wilkie knew this had occurred.

I dont know what the 1,119 medical errors were-but in any event 1,119 vets either got diagnosed and treated for something they didn't have or are finding out now that they have had a serious condition, that the pathology reports said they didn't have. If you watched the last Town Hall (I posted a link to it here)you can see the anquish and depair in vets who are still alive, but who didnt know yet what their future will be, waiting for VA to give them an accurate diagnosis and treatment.





Edited by Berta

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

A brief search for additional info gave me conflicting news reports that downplayed the bulk of those 1,119 errors and changed the  amount of vet's  medical records they have gone through at this point.

Only the local news outlets are following this up.

I think many of the veterans who VA might tell they were misdiagnosed or, not misdiagnosed at all, should get a second opinion outside of the VA.

Parks was asked again a question by a vet, and  does not have what I feel is a good answer at all....VA knew this pathologist was a mess. Why wasn't he fired sooner?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines