Well finally understand what the VA is doing even Tho it make no sense.
Ok now my cavc remand is now 3 different appeals again. 2 time they did this.
The soc to address the pending appeal from 2003. They turn this into a new appeal. He told me the way it listed it not a cavc remand or a bva remand. Smh. Soc send 12-28-2022. VA form 9 due on 60 days
Ok the effective date for smc s and l is been work in ama even tho I never requested to be removed from legacy.
Ok this is assigned with a rater. 12-13-22.
The legacy appeal addressing the loss of use and higher level smc o and r
And a higher rating for mental health over 70%.
Is wait for rating authorization this is the way he said it not me as of two days ago.
I can't even tell you what was rated and needs authorization.
I bet all they did was raise the mental health. To 100% Which doesn't help me . smh
Well now I will be fight 3 appeals again this is just crazy this was one appeal started 2018.
Now do you think this isn't been done on purpose.
How do you not address the higher level smc and effective dates together so I can be give a proper decision.
If my mental health remaining pending in appeal status 2003. Smc s effective dates would be 2003 under the 100/60 thing.
this is why the cavc remand states all my issues are intertwine.
But the bva and ro chose to keep addressing all my issue separate
I will have to do a new advance on the docket To get the pending appeal return to the judge.
Question
Mr cue
Well finally understand what the VA is doing even Tho it make no sense.
Ok now my cavc remand is now 3 different appeals again. 2 time they did this.
The soc to address the pending appeal from 2003. They turn this into a new appeal. He told me the way it listed it not a cavc remand or a bva remand. Smh. Soc send 12-28-2022. VA form 9 due on 60 days
Ok the effective date for smc s and l is been work in ama even tho I never requested to be removed from legacy.
Ok this is assigned with a rater. 12-13-22.
The legacy appeal addressing the loss of use and higher level smc o and r
And a higher rating for mental health over 70%.
Is wait for rating authorization this is the way he said it not me as of two days ago.
I can't even tell you what was rated and needs authorization.
I bet all they did was raise the mental health. To 100% Which doesn't help me . smh
Well now I will be fight 3 appeals again this is just crazy this was one appeal started 2018.
Now do you think this isn't been done on purpose.
How do you not address the higher level smc and effective dates together so I can be give a proper decision.
If my mental health remaining pending in appeal status 2003. Smc s effective dates would be 2003 under the 100/60 thing.
this is why the cavc remand states all my issues are intertwine.
But the bva and ro chose to keep addressing all my issue separate
I will have to do a new advance on the docket To get the pending appeal return to the judge.
even he understand this all wrong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
Popular Days
Dec 31
1
Top Posters For This Question
Mr cue 1 post
Popular Days
Dec 31 2022
1 post
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now