Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ or “VA med center won’t schedule my surgery”instead of ‘I have a question.
Knowledgeable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title.
I don’t read all posts every login and will gravitate towards those I have more info on.
Use paragraphs instead of one massive, rambling introduction or story.
Again – You want to make it easy for others to help. If your question is buried in a monster paragraph, there are fewer who will investigate to dig it out.
Leading too:
Post straightforward questions and then post background information.
Examples:
Question A. I was previously denied for apnea – Should I refile a claim?
Adding Background information in your post will help members understand what information you are looking for so they can assist you in finding it.
Rephrase the question: I was diagnosed with apnea in service and received a CPAP machine, but the claim was denied in 2008. Should I refile?
Question B. I may have PTSD- how can I be sure?
See how the details below give us a better understanding of what you’re claiming.
Rephrase the question: I was involved in a traumatic incident on base in 1974 and have had nightmares ever since, but I did not go to mental health while enlisted. How can I get help?
This gives members a starting point to ask clarifying questions like “Can you post the Reasons for Denial of your claim?”
Note:
Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed. This process does not take long.
Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed. The review requirement will usually be removed by the 6th post. However, we reserve the right to keep anyone on moderator preview.
This process allows us to remove spam and other junk posts before hitting the board. We want to keep the focus on VA Claims, and this helps us do that.
Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:
You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons …Continue reading
Question
allan
fwd from Colonel Dan
Veterans' health care fiasco a long time coming
Posted by the Asbury Park Press <http://www.app.com/> on 03/11/07
http://www.app.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?A...N/703110304/103
0
BY CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH
Contrite, apologetic and vowing change, top Army brass came to Capitol Hill
last week promising reform in the wake of devastating reports of substandard
care at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
General after general apologized profusely, while at the same time asserting
there were no warning signs about the gross mismanagement, excessive red
tape and inadequate conditions that wounded soldiers seeking outpatient care
at the hospital have been subjected to for years.
Excuse me for remaining skeptical about their contentions. The problems at
Walter Reed are a microcosm of the problems I have warned my colleagues and
the administration about for years regarding health care for our veterans
and service personnel.
The fiasco at Walter Reed was avoidable. For too long, Congress and
executive branches headed by both parties have sought ways to cut corners
and skimp on health care for our wounded servicemen and women, as well as
our nation's veterans.
Health care cannot be provided on the cheap. If you do not invest in modern
facilities, adequate staffing levels and necessary equipment, you end up
with inadequate care. In military and Department of Veterans Affairs medical
systems, that maxim is worsened by excessive bureaucratic red tape.
During my 24 years on the House Veterans Affairs Committee and my time as
chairman from 2000 to 2004, I constantly ran into barriers in my efforts to
modernize the VA health care system and ensure a seamless transition for
wounded servicemen and women as they left Department of Defense-operated
hospitals and sought continued care in VA facilities.
I worked to pass legislation to promote information sharing between the
Defense Department and VA medical systems to reduce bureaucratic delays -
just like those experienced by soldiers at Walter Reed - only to see those
programs shortchanged by congressional appropriators. I authored and saw
legislation to overhaul outdated VA facilities pass in the House in 2001,
but it died in the Senate. A similar bill I wrote finally became law two
years later, but during that two-year lag, conditions only deteriorated
further at many VA facilities.
Despite these obstacles, I led the fight that successfully increased funding
for veterans health care by 42 percent over four years. After years of
study, research and investigation, I knew that more still needed to be done
to close the gap between the health care needs of veterans and the funds
provided to properly address those needs.
When push came to shove, in July of 2003, I urged my colleagues on the
committee to dig in our heels and tried to force the leaders of Congress to
provide the necessary $1.2 billion that our research showed was necessary to
adequately fund VA health care programs. I convinced 59 of my Republican
colleagues - including five committee chairmen - and only 50 Democrats to
join me in voting against the leadership's proposed VA spending bill because
it did not include enough money to cover the shortfall.
As a result of that vote, my Republican colleagues who joined me lost
funding for their district projects, I lost my chairmanship and - worst of
all - veterans lost much-needed resources to provide essential medical care.
Within six months of losing my chairmanship, however, the Bush
administration and Congress were forced to admit that the funds provided
were short for that year - the exact amount that the VA committee under my
leadership had predicted.
My argument was - and continues to be - that the needs of veterans must come
first in the queue for funding. If you are not here for those who volunteer
to put their lives on the line for our safety and security, then you do not
belong in Congress.
Whether it be proper compensation for a service-connected injury or disease,
a lifeline to our homeless vets or cutting edge research for traumatic brain
and spinal cord injuries, post-traumatic stress disorder or those in need of
world-class prosthetics, Congress has a sacred obligation to meet those
needs.
One way to meet this commitment is to reform the funding mechanisms for VA
and military health care. Medical needs comprise half of the VA budget, yet
it is this portion of the department's budget that receives discretionary
funding that has been consistently shortchanged.
Programs like the GI Bill are funded through mandatory spending mechanisms.
Education benefits from the GI Bill will be funded at up to $37,000 per
participant this year and that money will be there.
Surprisingly, the same cannot be said for crucial VA health care programs.
The funds for the health care programs are not set and are instead
politicized every year.
The amounts budgeted by the administration and Congress for veterans' health
care vary annually and the total eventually appropriated by Congress is
often radically different than the budget request. However, one thing has
remained constant in recent years - the final amount allocated to veterans'
health care has consistently been low-balled.
I will continue to work to change this inequity and ensure mandatory, full
and predictable funding for VA health care. Let's change the process. Let
the actuaries and health care professionals at VA - not the Office of
Management and Budget - tell us what is needed. That same approach should be
mandated for Defense Department health care spending. When it comes to
budgeting for health care, timeliness, predictability and delivery are as
important as funding levels.
It is time for years of unheeded recommendations to be acted on. No more
excuses. We must honor our commitment in more than words. We must honor our
obligation in deeds - and most importantly in this case - in funding.
Christopher H. Smith, a Republican, is in his 27th year representing the 4th
Congressional District, which includes parts of Monmouth and Ocean counties.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
"Keep on, Keepin' on"
Dan Cedusky, Champaign IL "Colonel Dan"
See my web site at:
http://www.angelfire.com/il2/VeteranIssues/
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
Popular Days
Apr 2
2
Top Posters For This Question
Pete53 1 post
allan 1 post
Popular Days
Apr 2 2007
2 posts
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts