Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Legislation Improving Wounded Warrior Benefit Picks Up Support

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

fwd

NEWS FROM THE RANKING MEMBER OF THE U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS'

AFFAIRS

CRAIG'S LEGISLATION IMPROVING WOUNDED WARRIOR BENEFIT PICKS UP SUPPORT

AT HEARING

<http://veterans.senate.gov/ranking_member_news.cfm?FuseAction=Home.Home

&month=5&year=2007&release_id=1017>

May 9, 2007

Media contact: Jeff Schrade (202) 224-9093

(Washington, DC) During a lengthy Senate hearing

<http://veterans.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.CurrentHearing

s&rID=1014> Wednesday regarding 26 bills affecting benefits for

veterans, U.S. Senator Larry Craig received positive reactions to six

bills he is sponsoring, including one (S. 225 <http://www.thomas.gov> )

that would amend the Wounded Warrior legislation he sponsored and

Congress passed in 2005.

Craig noted that Toshiro Carrington, a Navy Seal, (pictured with Sen.

Craig below) is one of those who would benefit from a change the Idaho

Republican is proposing. Carrington lost his left hand and the top of

his right thumb during a training accident at Camp Pendleton in

California on December 15, 2004, when an explosive charge was

accidentally detonated by another sailor.

"When we passed the original Wounded Warrior benefit, we provided

payments to those servicemembers seriously injured and wounded in

Afghanistan and Iraq from September 2001 onward. And from December 2005,

we covered all U.S. servicemembers seriously injured anywhere in the

world. My new legislation this year would extend coverage to all

servicemembers, no matter where they were, from the start of the war on

terror. Toshiro Carrington is with us today and is one of those who

would benefit from the change I am speaking about," said Craig, the

ranking member of the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

Craig's original Wounded Warrior bill has since provided nearly $200

million to over 3,000 veterans seriously wounded and injured since the

war on terror began in 2001. The payments range from $25,000 to

$100,000, depending on the severity of the injury. The average payout is

approximately $64,000. Coverage includes injuries such as the loss of

limbs, hearing and sight

<http://www.insurance.va.gov/sgliSite/TSGLI/TSGLI.htm> . Payments are

generally made within eight weeks after the servicemember is hurt.

But as the Idaho Republican talked about changes that are needed to

improve the lives of veterans, he cautioned that if Congress passed all

26 bills now before the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, the total

would come to nearly $100 billion dollars.

"I am not pointing fingers. I have six bills among the twenty-six we are

reviewing today. Our heart tells us to do everything we can for every

person who ever wore a uniform, but our pocketbooks tell us we need to

prioritize," said Craig.

Spending on VA programs has grown from $48 billion in 2001 to over $80

billion this year.

####

* See this release online at:

http://veterans.senate.gov/ranking_member_...=Home.Home&

month=5&year=2007&release_id=1017

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use