Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

An Iu Claim Versus The Appeal

Rate this question


nomochow

Question

Veterans and friends of Hadit,

I will try to keep it simple. I want to know how big a mistake (perhaps) was made when I submitted an NOD requesting increase that would be converted to IU and a formal claim for IU at the same time. VA has finally got around to sending letter to elect DRO or BVA. Claim for IU is waiting for employer data with a very strong C&P and DAV letter suggesting IU. My thought is they want to say the issues are "inextricably intertwined" and cancel my formal IU claim to combine these into a DRO process. Can they do that? I think DAV wants me to drop the claim so I cant drop them if my formal claim is denied-does that make any sense. Bottom line...do they have to rate the claim??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't know what you mean by "I submitted an NOD requesting increase that would be converted to IU," but the VA cannot award IU unless the VA Form 21-8940 has been submitted. This is even the case if they inferred the issue. The RO will probabaly work the IU claim first and then decided the appeal, meaning a RVSR will decide the issue of IU and then either the DRO or the BVA will decided the NOD.

Vike 17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Vike17 for your quick reply,

what did I mean when I said "I submitted an NOD requesting increase that would be converted to IU,"

The NOD specifically pointed out that my rating was too low and should be increased to a percentage that would allow consideration of IU. And the formal IU application was submitted. I understand claims are settled then appeals but since this formal IU claim has dragged on for about 14 months, they are looking into doing something with the appeal. bottom line... are there any circumstances where these gangsters can disregard or "combine" the formal application into a DRO process or some other circumvented action??

I appreciate your comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The bottom line is that the claim for IU is a new claim and the DRO does not have jurisdiction over it. What might happen in your case is that the DRO may decided the issues on appeal first because they would have a direct bearing on the new issue of IU that needs to be decided by the RVSR.

Vike 17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Vike 17,

considering each has dragged on for 14 months, is this any incentive for a DRO to decide the appeal quick since basically the same thing (IU claim) is waiting for resolution?

Perhaps I am wrong here, but my guess would be that since both are "inextricably intertwined" that a DRO would want a lower employee (RVSR) to do this to prevent the senior employee from doing basically the same thing. does that make sense??

either way it goes perhaps someone will get out of some work and my hope is it isnt the RVSR because a DRO is likely to take much longer and this appears to have the affect of preventing a lawyer from getting involved. do you agree?

other heavyweights such as Berta, Pete53 and John999 are welcome to provide analysis

I get about 80% of my advice here. keep up the excellent hard work. thank you much for the valuable insight!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am going through something similar to your claim, many of the things are intertwined and they have told me that my IU claim which is being appealed through the DRO, is on hold until the hearing. The other claims that are somewhat intertwined with it are being decided first they said because the DRO appeal and the new claims go to different places. However the Appeal or DRO team has authority over the claims dept at the RO. They sometimes pull the file to look at it and the claims dept only gets it back when the DRO team is done with it. This shuffling of paperwork back and forth is what takes forever it seems but, it will all work out in the end if you don't waiver from your intentions keep up the fight!!!

Also you have to actually fill out the form for IU for them to consider it i belive. The NOD may get them to look at it but, they are not just going to hand it over without the proper paperwork in order. Dont give em any excuses to slow your claim down, fill out everything date stamp it with the post office and send it in certified mail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use