Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cnn Snubs Veteran’s Issues During Youtube Presidential Debate

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

fwd from: Gene

OFFE press release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

December 1, 2007

CNN Snubs Veteran’s Issues During YouTube Presidential Debate

If you are a veteran, or the family member of a veteran, or you are currently serving on active duty, you were probably very disappointed and even embarrassed by the content of Wednesday night’s televised debate. The CNN regulated YouTube video questions ranged from tax cuts, to illegal aliens, to gays in the military, to the New York Yankees and Red Socks baseball teams. Apparently, the news crew at CNN felt these were the most important issues of the 2008 Presidential Election. Some of the submitted video productions were very clever and featured cartoon illustrated questions. One video showcased one Mr. Jay “NRA supporter” Fox firing live rounds from an assault rifle in a reckless way and catching a loaded pump shotgun thrown to him from off camera. The only thing missing was a dog and pony. During the two hour broadcast, several candidates referred to our troops and bragged about the success of the current ‘surge’ in Iraq. But, not once did any of the candidates address the future of our troop’s healthcare, or show concern for their earned future benefits, entitlements, or services.

In spite of all this, and according to CNN’s crack correspondent, Anderson Cooper “It was a fascinating debate” and “The candidates took it all on tonight!” A review of the 4927 YouTube video submissions reveals several very legitimate questions about veteran’s affairs, renewable energy, education, and national healthcare. Obviously, CNN felt no obligation to air any of these questions. Apparently, Mr. Anderson Cooper and CNN felt baseball and homosexuality was more worthy of nationwide recognition - then squeezing in a meaningless question about our disabled and retired veterans and their earned healthcare. The question I have for CNN is; if you don’t ask the Republicans the same questions as the Democrats, how in the hell are we suppose to know the differences between candidates on any particular issue?

The low point of Wednesday night’s CNN debate coverage was when Retired Army, Brigadier General, Keith Kerr delivered a very lengthy comment on gays in the military - in addition to his YouTube video submission. At one point, it appeared CNN intentionally cut the General’s microphone off in an effort to get him to sit down and shut up. It was extremely obvious that everyone on the stage was very uncomfortable with the General’s disgraceful display. According to my clock, General Kerr and homosexuality were given the most time of all the CNN YouTube submissions. Evidently, General Kerr feels ‘gay rights’ in the military is the most important problem and urgent situation facing our military personnel and their families today. I’m certain our wounded troops recovering at Walter Reed and Brook Army Medical Center were glad to hear that. CNN later reported that General Kerr was a registered Democrat and political operative from the Hilary Clinton camp, and that he (General Kerr) infiltrated the CNN debate (at the invitation and expense of CNN) in an effort to embarrass the Republican candidates. Now, don’t get me wrong, I have nothing against homosexuals or generals. However, I really don’t think this issue deserved a reserved front-row seat at the Presidential debate.

Over the past few months, several of the Democratic Presidential Candidates have publicly endorsed mandatory full funding for veteran’s healthcare, yet, not one Republican has been asked to address this very important issue. During past televised Democratic debates the subject of veteran’s healthcare has been openly discussed, but the very same subject has been omitted in all of the Republican debates. Democratic Presidential Candidate, Bill Richardson has even published a comprehensive veteran’s healthcare plan, including the introduction of a HERO health card which would allow eligible veterans to access local medical services outside of the VA. To view a list of OFFE Resolution endorsements, visit;

http://offe2008.org/public_html/resolution.htm

Now, I know some will accuse me of just being ‘jealous’ that baseball and gay rights received national coverage and a few questions I personally thought were more important weren’t asked. Well, jealous is the wrong word. I was insulted that the Yankees and Red Socks baseball teams trumped the urgent healthcare needs of all of our troops. I was incensed that several very legitimate questions were omitted from the program in order to showcase the improper and dangerous way to handle a loaded firearm. I was embarrassed that Retired Army General Kerr would put his personal sexual preference above the greater good and healthcare needs of all former military personnel. I was offended that CNN and Anderson Cooper chose the YouTube video submissions based on entertainment and shock value rather than substance. And I was disappointed to see this country’s news media cares so little about the immediate needs of our veterans. Jealousy has nothing to do with it.

Thank you Mr. Anderson Cooper and CNN for dropping the ball! CNN might know about New York baseball, but they have no idea what the score is. I would love to have been a fly on the wall at that pre-debate CNN production meeting. “Well, Anderson, we have enough time for one more question, what do you suggest? How about a question about baseball, or man on man sex in the military? BRILLIANT!”

Operation Firing For Effect (OFFE) is a bi-partisan grassroots leader in the battle for full mandatory funding for VA healthcare. Last year, OFFE authored a Resolution for full mandatory funding for veteran’s healthcare. As of this date, OFFE’s Resolution has been signed by a number of prominent politicians and high profile celebrities such as, Willie Nelson, Bill Cosby, Senator Hilary Clinton, and Governor Bill Richardson just to name a few. The OFFE Resolution has been endorsed by several major Labor Unions, including the AFL/CIO. Voters in several counties in Illinois (led by Cook County) will see a question on their February 5, 2008 Primary Election Ballot concerning full funding for the VA. And the necessary paperwork has been filed to put the very same question about veteran’s healthcare on the California General Election ballot. There is very little doubt that veteran’s healthcare is on the minds of many voters, and they deserve to hear from the candidates on this issue before they cast their vote, not after. Last Wednesday night’s CNN YouTube fiasco was far from informative or focused. The American public learned nothing about the candidates. No, wait! I take that back! I did learn something! I learned that the New York Yankees won 4 World Series Championships while Rudy Giuliani was Mayor. And I also learned Senator John McCain believes the U.S. never lost a battle in Vietnam. The Senator obviously wasn’t on my last patrol in Vietnam when my patrol was ambushed and we got our collective asses kicked, but I digress. The point being, nothing of any real substance was revealed during Wednesday’s CNN YouTube debate.

If you are tired of the political parlor games and you are fed up with the same old canned responses from our politicians, the time has come for you to get involved. If you would like to join the OFFE Team and help us improve and protect the entitlements and services earned by our men and women in uniform, please visit; www.offe2008.org. We are also asking all former military personnel and their families and supporters to contact CNN and comment on this issue.

Here is a link to just one example of a question rejected by CNN.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a311ncaqlU

If you are fed up with our former military personnel being treated as second-class citizens, we suggest you tune in to ‘VFVC Live on the Air’ every Tuesday night at 9PM [EST] on Stardust radio. You can listen to the program on you computer at www.stardustradio.com. The time to stand up and be counted is NOW!

Operation Firing For Effect (OFFE) is a bi-partisan Veterans Advocacy group, and subsidiary of Veterans For Veteran Connection, Inc., a 501©19 non-profit corporation devoted to the protection and improvement of entitlements and services earned by our men and women in uniform. OFFE does not endorse political candidates running for office. OFFE does report on issues of importance to our former military personnel and their families and that includes ‘News’ from both sides of the aisle. OFFE will grant equal time to any candidate (regardless of political affiliation) who wishes to share and explain their position(s) on ‘Veterans’ Affairs’.

Please give this article the widest possible distribution.

Jere Beery

National Public Relations Director

Operation Firing For Effect

www.offe2008.org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use