Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Need Critique On Statement In Support Of Claim (draft)

Rate this question


71M10

Question

I have drafted out a response to VA letter on my current claim for service connection. It is not quite finished but I would appreciate any comments (good or bad).

In reply to VA letter dated December 4, 2007 in reply, refer to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.

In this letter you indicate “VA needs evidence showing that the following condition(s) existed from military service to the present time:” I would like to point out this is an incorrect statement. CFR 38 Part 3:303(:o Chronicity and continuity. With chronic disease shown as such in service (or within the presumptive period under §3.307) so as to permit a finding of service connection, subsequent manifestations of the same chronic disease at any later date, however remote, are service connected, unless clearly attributable to intercurrent causes. I was diagnosed with Essential Hypertension in Seoul Korea at the 121 EVAC Hospital by Captain M B, MD on 3/10/1986. 6/37 FA medical personnel did not follow the treatment plan developed.

In the 12/4/2007 letter seven bullet points are in the letter as types of additional evidence that is required I will address them in order.

1. Dates of medical treatment…. As stated earlier in this letter I was diagnosed, but the Army failed to implement the treatment plan. I will list below the elevated blood pressure readings contained in the service medical records. I have indicated the date, medical facility, my rank, my assigned unit and the details of the medical record.

12/12/1984 0715hrs, Kimbrough Army Community Hospital, PVT, Headquarters Company United States Army Garrison Fort Meade Md. Reading 140/100, M C, CPT MD was physician of record

2/8/1986 BN Aid Station 6/37FA Camp Essayons Korea, SP4, Headquarters Battery 6/37FA, 2nd ID. Chronological Record of Medical Care SF 600, reading was 160/100 laying down and 130/90 upright. Treating medical personnel CWO D W, PA.

2/10/1986 BN Aid Station 6/37FA Camp Essayons Korea, SP4, Headquarters Battery 6/37FA, 2nd ID. Chronological Record of Medical Care SF 600, reading was 134/96 laying down and 136/112 upright. Record does not indicate who took the reading.

2/11/1986 1100hrs BN Aid Station 6/37FA Camp Essayons Korea, SP4, Headquarters Battery 6/37FA, 2nd ID. Chronological Record of Medical Care SF 600, reading was 142/90 laying down and 136/92 upright. Record does not indicate who took the reading.

2/11/1986 1518hrs BN Aid Station 6/37FA Camp Essayons Korea, SP4, Headquarters Battery 6/37FA, 2nd ID. Chronological Record of Medical Care SF 600, reading was 122/78 laying down and 142/100 upright. Recorded by L W.

2/12/1986 0930hrs BN Aid Station 6/37FA Camp Essayons Korea, SP4, Headquarters Battery 6/37FA, 2nd ID. Chronological Record of Medical Care SF 600, reading was 132/82 laying down and 138/100 upright. Recorded by J W

2/12/1986 Noted as PM BN Aid Station 6/37FA Camp Essayons Korea, SP4, Headquarters Battery 6/37FA, 2nd ID. Chronological Record of Medical Care SF 600, reading was 140/86 laying down and 144/96 upright. Recorded by J W

2/13/1986 0944hrs Camp Red Cloud, Uijongbu, Korea. SP4, Headquarters Battery 6/37FA, 2nd ID. Clinical Record Electrocardiographic Record SF-507, Blood pressure recorded as 142/100 and EKG print-out indicates Non-specific T wave abnormality – Abnormal ECG. Radiological report from same date notes no significant abnormalities by S V, but a marginal note CPT J D “?RT Atrial Hypertrophy?”

2/28/1986 & 3/10/1986 BN Aid Station 6/37FA Camp Essayons Korea, SP4, Headquarters Battery 6/37FA, 2nd ID. Medical Record Consultation Sheet SF-513. Diagnosis of prob essential hypertension. BP readings of 126/96 left arm(seated), 128/92 R arm(laying down), 4 step plan on consultation report not implemented by medical personnel.

5/13/1987 0633hrs Consolidated Troop Medical Clinic, William Beaumont Medical Center. SP4, A Battery 1st Support BN. Emergency Care and Treatment SF 558 Blood pressure was recorded as 140/110. CPT D D. C, MD treating physician.

In summary, the complete copy of my service medical records provided to me by the Veterans Administration contains 26 blood pressure readings covering my 4 years of service. Of those readings 6 have diastolic readings equal to or greater than 100 mm hg, which is clarifying for a rating of 10% under code 7101. 14 of the diastolic readings are equal to or above 90 mm hg, which under criteria from the American Heart Association and National Institutes of Health qualifies as hypertension. 4 of these readings have diastolic readings in excess of 80 hh mg, which is regarded as pre-hypertensive by these same organizations. I was sent to two different medical facilities and reviewed by medical personnel with a diagnosis by an internal medicine specialist of essential hypertension. Clearly, this meets the requirements for direct service connection as set out in CFR Title 38 part 3, 3:03.

2. Statements from persons who knew you…… I have no evidence to submit in this category.

3. Records and statements from service medical personnel…I have no additional records of this nature.

4. Besides my Military Entrance Examination I have not taken any employment physical examinations.

5. Medical evidence….

Please find attached Magnetic Resonance Report from Michigan State University Clinical Center dated 11/26/2007. This report indicates paraspinal and presacral soft tissue evaluation suggests cardiomegaly. It also indicates in findings axial images suggest cardiomegaly. This exam was followed up by a VA echocardiogram on 12/20/2007, that confirmed cardiomegaly and stated my Left ventricular function was 50%. This warrants a rating of 60% under code 7007.

Letter from Dr. CB, D.O. dated January 8, 2008 listing medications that have been prescribed by her over the years for my hypertension.

Letter from D K. Y, dated 11/12/2007 in this letter he clearly characterizes me as having hypertension in service. He reviewed the VA provided copy of my SMR prior to writing this letter.

My current VA primary care physician is A T S, he currently is prescribing 40mg Lisinopril and 25mg of HCTZ for High-blood pressure. This medication causes me to have to go to the bathroom frequently. It causes me to have to urinate approximately every 90 minutes.

6. Pharmacy prescription records. I have no records of this nature to turn over see letter from physician on medications prescribed.

7. Insurance examination reports. I have taken no insurance examinations and therefore have nothing to forward.

I have enclosed an authorization and consent to release form for Dr. C B although information from her is not necessary since hypertension was diagnosed in service and the VA is also currently treating me. I have met the requirements for in-service diagnosis and am currently being treated for the same disability by the Veterans Administration.

I have enclosed my VCAA notice response

Please rate my Hypertension, Cardiomegaly(hypertensive heart disease) secondary to Hypertension, Urinary frequency of 1-2 hours (90 min) secondary to Hypertension (side effect of Medication).

Sorry, I know it is long. Should I list the dates and readings out like this(make it easy for them) or will it just alienate the ratings officer? In thier letter they said they were requesting an exam, but I havn't heard anything on that yet.

Best regards,

Tyler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Again, thank you all.

The length on my statement/reply is because the VA asked me to list out the specific, dates, places, and treating individuals. They actually asked me to list everthing from service to present. That would entail listing every doctors appointment I had for the last 20 years.

My Initial communication on this claim was short, It essentially said "Request service connection and rating for Hypertension, diagnosed while in service during the month of March 1986. Currently treated for Hypertension by VA physician A.S. and receiving medication through VA pharmacy."

I gave it to them short and sweet. In response they sent me a VCAA letter that stated I had to show them I have been receiving continuing care for hypertension since leaving the service and I needed to provide them dates of treatment, pharmacy records, and records releases for treating physicians. Obviously they are trying to treat this as an undiagnosed disease/illness in an attempt to make me give up. Unless of course they didn't even look at the SMR before drafting the VCAA letter.

I was Diagnosed in service and currently afflicted/disabled, no remarkable medical history in between that didn't exist from service-to-date. That meets the standard for direct service connection right? Are they allowed to question the probative value of the diagnosis in the service medical record (not worried here they sent me to an internal medicine doc)?

I will enclose a records release for my private physician but really want them to make a decision without requesting those records (which shouldn't be required) I have a letter from the doctor stating Ive been under treatment for Hypertension since 1989 and a listing of all the medications I have been on.

I saw a wonderful anectdote over on Watchdog:

Q: How many VA claims officers does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A: None. They just unanimously agree to deny it was burned

out in the first place and continue to work in the dark.

Again thank you all!

Best regards,

Tyler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tyler- they MUST consider those SMRs-

as a matter of fact the VA might have to apply 38 USC 1101 (38 CFR 3.309) to your claim- because even if the disability is not listed in these regs-(HTN is only listed if chronic and due to cardiovascular disease-)

the VBM makes the point that if medical evidence can prove the disease or disability was chronic-and also documented in their SMRs-

they can be awarded direct SC for it.

VBM (NVLSP) suggests however obtaining strong medical evidence such as an IMO and you can cite Sacks V. West and Brannon if you are going to use a medical treatise to support chronicty in service and at least 10% disabling-- but read them first to see what I mean.

Ha HA I almost posted that quote from Larry here this AM!

Thanks for that!

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want them to rate you claim, from my understanding state this is all the evidence I have in my possession at this time. Please rate my claim.

Whatever they requested then say attached are copies of my smr that show the dates I was treated.

I was treated by the xxVA from xxx-xxx pertinent records attached.

I was seen my Dr. xxx through the years of xxx-xxx (go get a copy of those records yourself and attach them)

Whatever you have line by line of what they asked, but I still wouldn't explain the evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use