Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Treasure Island Naval

Rate this question


Berta

Question

From Colonel Dan Cedusky email:

"If you served at Treasure Island Naval Air Station CA... Read and copy these story's and reports, and file a claim for any

illnesses..

From: allanopie@peoplepc.com [mailto:allanopie@peoplepc.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 4:59 AM

To: Allan Opie

Subject: Emailing: Treasure Island Naval Air Station Ca And Toxic Waste - hadit.com Veterans Forum

http://www.scorecard.org/env-releases/land...1170090087#maps

http://www.scorecard.org/env-releases/land...id=CA1170090087

http://www.sfweekly.com/2006-05-24/news/toxic-acres/

http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/p...bal_id=38370044

http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-02-21/news/dig-this/

Dig This

By Ron Russell

Published: February 21, 2007

In a surprise move, the Navy has announced it will conduct yet another round of environmental cleanup in a residential area that is home to more than 2,000 people at the former Treasure Island Naval Air Station.

James Sanders

The Navy says it will haul away 31,000 cubic yards — or 1,800 truck loads — of soil contaminated with cancer-causing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, and other harmful substances from within the community of city-administered rental houses at the north end of the island.

Word of the latest cleanup effort has added to the unease among some residents long critical of the pace and scope of the Navy's remediation work on the island. That's because the Navy now plans to expand the decontamination effort to an area encompassing seven apartment buildings that were supposedly in a safe area.

"To me it adds a question mark as to what the Navy has been saying about the safety of the [housing complex] all along," says resident and community activist Emily Rapaport. "Do I think this really takes care of the contamination problem? Of course not."

The 90-acre tract of former military housing — dubbed Area 12 on maps the Navy devised to help clean up toxic waste at the former base — was once the site of ammunition bunkers and solid waste dumps. Some of the houses were built on the site of a former training school for radioactive waste removal that operated from 1957 to the mid-1970s.

Although federal and state authorities approved the reuse of Area 12 for rental use in 1999, two years after the base closed, some critics have long questioned whether people should be allowed to live there at all. Tenants must sign disclaimers that, among other things, prohibit them from planting vegetables in their yards.

As reported earlier by SF Weekly ("Toxic Acres," May 24, 2006), the Navy had said as recently as last May that the remaining soil pollutants posed no significant health threat to residents and that its cleanup in Area 12 was essentially finished.

But a Navy spokesman now says that "additional analysis" of environmental testing conducted in 2003 indicates that more work was needed to substantially eliminate exposure to hazardous substances for current and future residents.

James Sullivan, the Navy's base-closure environmental coordinator, says the extended cleanup will be conducted in two stages, with most of it completed between March and August and the rest next year. The Navy intends to remove soil to a depth of 4 feet from several distinct areas within the housing compound.

Four of the targeted areas consist of abandoned apartment buildings that have long been fenced off. In one of those areas, testing in 2000 revealed PCBs in the soil at nearly 100,000 times the level deemed acceptable by the federal government.

Ned York, an official with the John Stewart Company, which manages the island's approximately 600 rental units for the city, says that of about 30 families directly affected, some have chosen to temporarily relocate elsewhere, while others have accepted rent-reduction offers and are staying put.

Under a massive real estate plan for Treasure Island, the former base housing will be demolished and Area 12 will become uninhabited wetlands and open space. But the developers' plans call for the rental units to remain for up to 10 years after construction of the master project starts. Even under the most optimistic scenario, which calls for the work to begin in 2009, it means that people could still be living in Area 12 until 2019 or beyond.

Christopher Grasteit, whose family moved to the island two years ago, is among those who plans to stay while his yard is dug up and replaced, but he isn't happy about it.

"It's really an eye-opener that [the Navy] is doing this," he says. "They tell us all along, 'Don't worry. The only places that are a problem are the areas behind the fences, and now this. A lot of people are wondering why the buildings where they live weren't fenced off to begin with."

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

From Colonel Dan Cedusky email:

"If you served at Treasure Island Naval Air Station CA... Read and copy these story's and reports, and file a claim for any

illnesses..

From: allanopie@peoplepc.com [mailto:allanopie@peoplepc.com]

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 4:59 AM

To: Allan Opie

Subject: Emailing: Treasure Island Naval Air Station Ca And Toxic Waste - hadit.com Veterans Forum

http://www.scorecard.org/env-releases/land...1170090087#maps

http://www.scorecard.org/env-releases/land...id=CA1170090087

http://www.sfweekly.com/2006-05-24/news/toxic-acres/

http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/p...bal_id=38370044

http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-02-21/news/dig-this/

Dig This

By Ron Russell

Published: February 21, 2007

In a surprise move, the Navy has announced it will conduct yet another round of environmental cleanup in a residential area that is home to more than 2,000 people at the former Treasure Island Naval Air Station.

James Sanders

The Navy says it will haul away 31,000 cubic yards — or 1,800 truck loads — of soil contaminated with cancer-causing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, and other harmful substances from within the community of city-administered rental houses at the north end of the island.

Word of the latest cleanup effort has added to the unease among some residents long critical of the pace and scope of the Navy's remediation work on the island. That's because the Navy now plans to expand the decontamination effort to an area encompassing seven apartment buildings that were supposedly in a safe area.

"To me it adds a question mark as to what the Navy has been saying about the safety of the [housing complex] all along," says resident and community activist Emily Rapaport. "Do I think this really takes care of the contamination problem? Of course not."

The 90-acre tract of former military housing — dubbed Area 12 on maps the Navy devised to help clean up toxic waste at the former base — was once the site of ammunition bunkers and solid waste dumps. Some of the houses were built on the site of a former training school for radioactive waste removal that operated from 1957 to the mid-1970s.

Although federal and state authorities approved the reuse of Area 12 for rental use in 1999, two years after the base closed, some critics have long questioned whether people should be allowed to live there at all. Tenants must sign disclaimers that, among other things, prohibit them from planting vegetables in their yards.

As reported earlier by SF Weekly ("Toxic Acres," May 24, 2006), the Navy had said as recently as last May that the remaining soil pollutants posed no significant health threat to residents and that its cleanup in Area 12 was essentially finished.

But a Navy spokesman now says that "additional analysis" of environmental testing conducted in 2003 indicates that more work was needed to substantially eliminate exposure to hazardous substances for current and future residents.

James Sullivan, the Navy's base-closure environmental coordinator, says the extended cleanup will be conducted in two stages, with most of it completed between March and August and the rest next year. The Navy intends to remove soil to a depth of 4 feet from several distinct areas within the housing compound.

Four of the targeted areas consist of abandoned apartment buildings that have long been fenced off. In one of those areas, testing in 2000 revealed PCBs in the soil at nearly 100,000 times the level deemed acceptable by the federal government.

Ned York, an official with the John Stewart Company, which manages the island's approximately 600 rental units for the city, says that of about 30 families directly affected, some have chosen to temporarily relocate elsewhere, while others have accepted rent-reduction offers and are staying put.

Under a massive real estate plan for Treasure Island, the former base housing will be demolished and Area 12 will become uninhabited wetlands and open space. But the developers' plans call for the rental units to remain for up to 10 years after construction of the master project starts. Even under the most optimistic scenario, which calls for the work to begin in 2009, it means that people could still be living in Area 12 until 2019 or beyond.

Christopher Grasteit, whose family moved to the island two years ago, is among those who plans to stay while his yard is dug up and replaced, but he isn't happy about it.

"It's really an eye-opener that [the Navy] is doing this," he says. "They tell us all along, 'Don't worry. The only places that are a problem are the areas behind the fences, and now this. A lot of people are wondering why the buildings where they live weren't fenced off to begin with."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I already submitted a post about this. I already submitted on that and was denied. I made a post a few weeks ago about this. My claim was denied. They said I didn't prove exposure. I have about 200 to 300 pages of evidence I have already collected and submitted for this with reference to this. If anybody needs any info, I've been working on it 4 years now.Take a look at the poll I posted about three weeks ago, Treasure Island Chemical exposure.

Ron

Ron...we need to include something about this in your appeal.
Edited by RSG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are some of these illnesses. I saw them listed somewhere before but didn't log them into

my favorites to do a claim for my son. He was at Treasure Island for his Damage Control classes

in 1990 and again for refresher in 1991. Please let me know where to locate them. I could only

pullup the newspaper articles from Col. Dan.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Jan,

Some of the illnesses caused by chemical exposure are as follows:

Diabetes Type II, And all issues that can be associated with that.

Neurotoxins- Nerve/Brain damage.

Lead- brain damage

Pah's/Pcb's Dioxins, furans- cancer, diabetes, nerve and brain issues.

asbesto's- lung cancer,

I can get you a full list if you wish. I have 3 or

4 hundred pages of documentation already.

Those are just a few. right off the top of my head.

I also have the documents of the Island show the different areas of TI

that where affected. THERE ARE LISTS SHOWING what has been found and

certified that it's been found. The old barracks area

was built right on top of the old ammo bunkers, Lots of weird stuff

there. As well as all the old world's fair buildings and waste.

Ron

What are some of these illnesses. I saw them listed somewhere before but didn't log them into

my favorites to do a claim for my son. He was at Treasure Island for his Damage Control classes

in 1990 and again for refresher in 1991. Please let me know where to locate them. I could only

pullup the newspaper articles from Col. Dan.

Thanks

Edited by RSG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use